RiskTycoon wrote:it doesn't matter if he warned you or not that he was going to punish your whole clan ...
here everyone is again jumping up and down about it instead of just taking it like a man and going on with your CC life ....
what good does this thread do besides continue what you have already been doing ?
Look, democracy ends the second you hit that log in button ... if you don't like it then go somewhere else ..... Twill can do what ever he feels is right even if you don't agree .... Go make your own Conquer Club site and you can rule it anyway you want.
Good luck with that thought.... not even the mods are pressing that one in this thread, in fact besides Twill's comment, the mod-team has been eeringly quiet.
Perhaps in silent agreement with me about the injustice received .
Megadeth666 wrote:Can I suggest a sig, that the mods can just send, when giving a warning?
[Stupid Image]
It wasn't funny the first time. Why post it a second?
Cause all you kids are fighting over something, you can't have?....and It's funny, listen to the man or shut up ...How clear can it be?...I realize half of you guys are teenagers just wanting attention...Fuckin give it up
Megadeth666 wrote:Can I suggest a sig, that the mods can just send, when giving a warning?
[Stupid Image]
It wasn't funny the first time. Why post it a second?
Cause all you kids are fighting over something, you can't have?....and It's funny, listen to the man or shut up ...How clear can it be?...I realize half of you guys are teenagers just wanting attention...Fuckin give it up
Nope, still not funny. I didn't realize "leet speak" was still being used?
(and don't group me in with the others, I agree with your sentiment even if I don't find you humorous at all)
RiskTycoon wrote:it doesn't matter if he warned you or not that he was going to punish your whole clan ...
here everyone is again jumping up and down about it instead of just taking it like a man and going on with your CC life ....
what good does this thread do besides continue what you have already been doing ?
Look, democracy ends the second you hit that log in button ... if you don't like it then go somewhere else ..... Twill can do what ever he feels is right even if you don't agree .... Go make your own Conquer Club site and you can rule it anyway you want.
Good luck with that thought.... not even the mods are pressing that one in this thread, in fact besides Twill's comment, the mod-team has been eeringly quiet.
Perhaps in silent agreement with me about the injustice received .
ever heard of not throwing fuel on the fire?
"How do you like that? Even among misfits you're a misfit!"
Megadeth666 wrote:Can I suggest a sig, that the mods can just send, when giving a warning?
[Stupid Image]
It wasn't funny the first time. Why post it a second?
Cause all you kids are fighting over something, you can't have?....and It's funny, listen to the man or shut up ...How clear can it be?...I realize half of you guys are teenagers just wanting attention...Fuckin give it up
Actually, I am 20 and the youngest member of the bulletproof bandits .
Megadeth666 wrote:Can I suggest a sig, that the mods can just send, when giving a warning?
[Stupid Image]
It wasn't funny the first time. Why post it a second?
Cause all you kids are fighting over something, you can't have?....and It's funny, listen to the man or shut up ...How clear can it be?...I realize half of you guys are teenagers just wanting attention...Fuckin give it up
How stunningly presumptious.
Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
nagerous wrote:
Good luck with that thought.... not even the mods are pressing that one in this thread, in fact besides Twill's comment, the mod-team has been eeringly quiet.
Perhaps in silent agreement with me about the injustice received .
ever heard of not throwing fuel on the fire?
yeah, i have heard that expression. but if you are in the forums you can find comments about the situation, and if you have mods on msn/yahoo/aim/etc, you can also get honest opinions about what happened. this is from the forums, is this throwing fuel on the fire or just an honest and rational response to this situation?
Night Strike wrote:
owenshooter wrote:p.s.-now please justify the banning of an entire clan without warning AND how the admin that did it by not following his own rules/steps for banning members. and before you try to defend it, just remember an apology from him already exists in the forums... a small one, but at least an admission of going over the top.
lance nor any other mod has to justify the actions of an admin. That action was SOLELY Twill's doing. He did it to prove a point, and my guess is that if any of us mods had done that, we probably would have had to have a chat with Twill about it. We don't have to justify the actions of our "bosses".
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
He did PM me saying he was sorry I got caught up in it and that I would never get banned again unless it was for something I actually did and that's good enough for me...
nagerous wrote:He did PM me saying he was sorry I got caught up in it and that I would never get banned again unless it was for something I actually did and that's good enough for me...
well, i hope everyone that was banned that had nothing to do with it received one of those. and i hope a sound decision is made on the rash ruling we received, because we seem to be the lone individuals whom this rule is being enforced upon. a slew of threads exist where personal info is posted and reposted by members mods, etc, and they have not been locked, warned or banned without warning (the new precident set last week). seems a bit odd that the bandits are the lone users affected by this ruling. especially since we all choose to have our individual images in the sig if they are used, and since the sig has been flying in the forums and on PM's for a nice chunk of time. the black jesus has spoken...-0
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
whitestazn88 wrote:true that... i just realized i have my picture as my avy, i can't get banned for that right?
No you can't. If someone else were to use it in, say, an avatar or signature then they would be in trouble.
see, i disagree with the signature concept, if it is within his own clan. we flew it for over a year without a problem and it was all over the forums. then i asked a question in the proper forum to ask questions/rule clarifications, and suddenly we were all banned. you should be able to post your own image/info wherever you choose, and other should simply not be able to use it for flaming you in the forums, avatars/sigs. threads exist where members/mods have posted/reposted personal images and are encouraged to do so, without repercussion. one of CC's most visible sigs all of a sudden becomes public enemy number one, so twill can deal with one member rocking the boat by asking a valid question. the black jesus has spoken...-0
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
nagerous wrote:He did PM me saying he was sorry I got caught up in it and that I would never get banned again unless it was for something I actually did and that's good enough for me...
well, i hope everyone that was banned that had nothing to do with it received one of those.