Moderator: Community Team
I like a Thezz lynch a little more still because he actually has been scummy. Someone like Eddie is more of a policy vig type player if this is how he normally plays, either that or policy lynch which I think we have passed the stage to qualify for.spiesr wrote:So do you guys think we should just get rid of eddie now and save us is complete uselessness later on?
I've acted scummy??? By retracting a joke vote at a time of random voting?Its Bolt wrote: I like a Thezz lynch a little more still because he actually has been scummy.
By trying to get others to scumhunt for you. When you took off your random vote, it tends to be followed by acknowlagement that the random stage has ended and a vote based on something that is viewed as scummy. In your case it just came off and you looked for someone else to lead you in the direction of something scummy and maybe a lynch. This is scummy given that when you follow others, they tend to be the ones who take the blame for mislynches or anything else of that nature because they were the ones presenting the case and trying to get the player lynched.Thezzaruz wrote:I've acted scummy??? By retracting a joke vote at a time of random voting?Its Bolt wrote: I like a Thezz lynch a little more still because he actually has been scummy.
Its Bolt wrote: By trying to get others to scumhunt for you. When you took off your random vote, it tends to be followed by acknowlagement that the random stage has ended and a vote based on something that is viewed as scummy. In your case it just came off and you looked for someone else to lead you in the direction of something scummy and maybe a lynch. This is scummy given that when you follow others, they tend to be the ones who take the blame for mislynches or anything else of that nature because they were the ones presenting the case and trying to get the player lynched.
Not scumhunting in its own is also a scumtell, removed from the random stage. By not scumhunting you dont get anyone mislynched and never have to take any solid stances that can come back to bit you later. Its a fence-sitting stance to its utmost, when you cant decide enough on anything to actually make a case.
It seems to me almost anyway you play you give off scumtells. You have to be the first to vote or have a lengthy explanation behind your vote not to be seen scummy by Bolt.Its Bolt wrote:Not scumhunting in its own is also a scumtell, removed from the random stage. By not scumhunting you dont get anyone mislynched and never have to take any solid stances that can come back to bit you later. Its a fence-sitting stance to its utmost, when you cant decide enough on anything to actually make a case.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
I wonder if he sees himself as scummy sometimes tehn?sheepofdumb wrote:Bolt has a point, but
It seems to me almost anyway you play you give off scumtells. You have to be the first to vote or have a lengthy explanation behind your vote not to be seen scummy by Bolt.Its Bolt wrote:Not scumhunting in its own is also a scumtell, removed from the random stage. By not scumhunting you dont get anyone mislynched and never have to take any solid stances that can come back to bit you later. Its a fence-sitting stance to its utmost, when you cant decide enough on anything to actually make a case.
Don't forget that even with the lengthy explanation you still need to random vote...sheepofdumb wrote: It seems to me almost anyway you play you give off scumtells. You have to be the first to vote or have a lengthy explanation behind your vote not to be seen scummy by Bolt.
idk about everyone else, but i voted for him because thrice i saw him make the second vote on someone right after someone else made the first vote. (i hope that made sense) i noted it as: "somewhat bandwagonee"/ wrote:I may have misunderstood, I thought you were voting because thezz was noted as unvoting, (which is normal in any game...) I'll re-read later.

cena-rules wrote:Please replace me. I'm not gonna be able to be active for the foreseeable future.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Well some people are sheep and others wolves.baggins994 wrote:idk about everyone else, but i voted for him because thrice i saw him make the second vote on someone right after someone else made the first vote. (i hope that made sense) i noted it as: "somewhat bandwagonee"/ wrote:I may have misunderstood, I thought you were voting because thezz was noted as unvoting, (which is normal in any game...) I'll re-read later.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
This is the vote in question this is the first vote Thezz made in the game, it was the only vote cena has received so far, it is impossible to consider this a bandwagon, Thezz very quickly unvotes.Thezzaruz wrote:cena-rules wrote: Me Day Cop
Him Scum
You funny, me Vote cena-rules...
I see, thezz did ask for some ideas, I don't think that is scummy, but I do agree, there was no need to unvote, but it doesn't explicitly hurt town either. I find it slightly suspect, but not quite a scum tell.Thezzaruz wrote:Might as well UnVote, anyone have any leads?
sheepofdumb wrote:Unvote vote Its bolt for arguing.
spiesr wrote:Unvote vote sheep
This game needs more arguing not less...
This really isn't much in the random vote stage, I notice some confusion in numbers, LSU and Baggins in particular aren't counting correctly, which I assume to be part of a PR.Thezzaruz wrote:I could agree with that, Vote sheepofdumb.
I play much more regularly on mafiascum, where my style of play is more normal for what is there. I am not even considered a very aggressive player there. Yes everything can be streached into a scumtell if you make it, but what you have to eventually learn to do is determine what is and what isnt a scumtell through experiance and how people react to votes. Thezz even when I am pressuring him on something is just kicking back and for the most part launching an OMGUS attack on me for suspecting him.sheepofdumb wrote:Bolt has a point, but
It seems to me almost anyway you play you give off scumtells. You have to be the first to vote or have a lengthy explanation behind your vote not to be seen scummy by Bolt.Its Bolt wrote:Not scumhunting in its own is also a scumtell, removed from the random stage. By not scumhunting you dont get anyone mislynched and never have to take any solid stances that can come back to bit you later. Its a fence-sitting stance to its utmost, when you cant decide enough on anything to actually make a case.
sheepofdumb wrote:Unvote vote Its bolt for arguing.
spiesr wrote:Unvote vote sheep
This game needs more arguing not less...
This really isn't much in the random vote stage, I notice some confusion in numbers, LSU and Baggins in particular aren't counting correctly, which I assume to be part of a PR.[/quote]Thezzaruz wrote:I could agree with that, Vote sheepofdumb.
