Moderator: Community Team
Whilst my character could be accused of being involved in money, it is an extremely lukewarm accusation, with a weak claim to go with it. I attack the claim because I don't want to be forced to claim myself, of course I could do and then everyone would be happy?? But... I don't think me claiming would help the game any further.derfderf34 wrote:@ga7 he alreadt avoided that question
@everyone I promise you that I am Coleman Reese favour cop and last night I investigated nag and found him talking about large sums of money I suppose since of what you have all found on my character that I am not just a straight forward cop (maybe Niave)


Joke voteNatewolfman wrote:vote ace for having more posts so far than anyone! seems like the type of thing a manic joker would do
But notice he doesn't step in to try to discuss anything. Random votes someone, comes back several pages to unvote and goes back to lurking. Real helpful for town there.Natewolfman wrote:unvote because my vote was strictly a random vote and these days are moving too quickly to have a bunch of wasted random votes
And now he returns and bandwagons. Notice that he tries to absolve blame, if someone asks him why would a no-lynch be bad.Natewolfman wrote:this is going nowhare and fast, with the time limit coming up Vote kalishnikov he has the most votes on him right now and we must apply pressure somewhare or risk a no-lynch which (as ive been told in other games) is bad.
Real helpful there, nate. He doesn't actually put anything to the game, but gives a bland "maybe we should do something" remark. Notice how he thinks no-one looks scummy right now.Natewolfman wrote:the problem is, noone looks scummy right now, and the days are so short we have to get something done, i think we only have like 5 hours left right now before we get a no-lynch and as its been explained to me (numorus times) its always better to get a civi lynch in then no lynch at all, no?
Now this is interesting. Last day he bandwagoned on kalish, and now I saw nag and mm vote ga7 and noticed how it was suspicious. ga7 votes nag back, and look BandwagonMan is here to save the day, voting nag!Natewolfman wrote:im also going to vote nag for making a vote without any explination? vote will stand til we get a good reason
And this post is made just after derf claims flavour cop and what nag was. Yep, nate, you were totally reading what is happening just like yesterday when you unvoted and claimed no leads.Natewolfman wrote:unvote i have no leads and do not know whare to take thislol
"Shit! Someone caught onto me! When I meant I didn't have any leads, I didn't mean I didn't have any leads. We're playing mafia, I don't say what I mean. I meant I have to follow the crowd and blend in, I have to see whether people will defend nag and I will unvote and then go back to lurking, or if a wagon forms on him and I can happily hop on and finish day"Natewolfman wrote:haha, i didnt mean no leads, what i ment was, no clear answer, nag raises a good point, i just would like to hear more responces on this before my vote rests on nagga7 wrote: Nate, no leads O RLY? Didn't you see the 2 posts full of info just above yours? SFOS Nate
Very interesting, im sure im gonna seem like a bandwagoner, but FOS NateIliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.
Anyway I think that Nag should not claim, or at least just yet.
However one lurker and bandwagoner did catch my eye. Let's look at his track recordJoke voteNatewolfman wrote:vote ace for having more posts so far than anyone! seems like the type of thing a manic joker would doBut notice he doesn't step in to try to discuss anything. Random votes someone, comes back several pages to unvote and goes back to lurking. Real helpful for town there.Natewolfman wrote:unvote because my vote was strictly a random vote and these days are moving too quickly to have a bunch of wasted random votesAnd now he returns and bandwagons. Notice that he tries to absolve blame, if someone asks him why would a no-lynch be bad.Natewolfman wrote:this is going nowhare and fast, with the time limit coming up Vote kalishnikov he has the most votes on him right now and we must apply pressure somewhare or risk a no-lynch which (as ive been told in other games) is bad.Real helpful there, nate. He doesn't actually put anything to the game, but gives a bland "maybe we should do something" remark. Notice how he thinks no-one looks scummy right now.Natewolfman wrote:the problem is, noone looks scummy right now, and the days are so short we have to get something done, i think we only have like 5 hours left right now before we get a no-lynch and as its been explained to me (numorus times) its always better to get a civi lynch in then no lynch at all, no?Now this is interesting. Last day he bandwagoned on kalish, and now I saw nag and mm vote ga7 and noticed how it was suspicious. ga7 votes nag back, and look BandwagonMan is here to save the day, voting nag!Natewolfman wrote:im also going to vote nag for making a vote without any explination? vote will stand til we get a good reasonAnd this post is made just after derf claims flavour cop and what nag was. Yep, nate, you were totally reading what is happening just like yesterday when you unvoted and claimed no leads.Natewolfman wrote:unvote i have no leads and do not know whare to take thislol
And now the pattern emerges.
Vote someone, preferably with a few votes
Lurk
Come back to unvote, saying there is nothing to go on with
Go back to lurking
Bandwagon on anyone with a couple of votes
Make general, bland non-helpful statements about how maybe we should do something
Go back to lurking."Shit! Someone caught onto me! When I meant I didn't have any leads, I didn't mean I didn't have any leads. We're playing mafia, I don't say what I mean. I meant I have to follow the crowd and blend in, I have to see whether people will defend nag and I will unvote and then go back to lurking, or if a wagon forms on him and I can happily hop on and finish day"Natewolfman wrote:haha, i didnt mean no leads, what i ment was, no clear answer, nag raises a good point, i just would like to hear more responces on this before my vote rests on nagga7 wrote: Nate, no leads O RLY? Didn't you see the 2 posts full of info just above yours? SFOS Nate
Frankly I cannot see how this could stink of scum more. Lurking, skimming, bandwagoning, offering no discussion but just coming in to unvote, he does the lot.
Your probably telling the truth but that doesnt mean he is scum, either way unvotederfderf34 wrote:@ga7 he alreadt avoided that question
@everyone I promise you that I am Coleman Reese favour cop and last night I investigated nag and found him talking about large sums of money I suppose since of what you have all found on my character that I am not just a straight forward cop (maybe Niave)
Which two?animorpherv1 wrote:I'm thinking will toned down the killing roles.
anyways, I find neither of the two scummy. I've seen this behavior from both of them, although, nag is a little closer.
Im just not very good at mafiaIliad wrote: However one lurker and bandwagoner did catch my eye. Let's look at his track record
Is this the second time that Iliad has dropped a "subtle" hint that he is The Joker?Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.

I think that he means that if we don't lynch "the Joker", in this case, Nate, that he will blow up the hospital, like in the movie, but i could be wrong...Minister Masket wrote:Is this the second time that Iliad has dropped a "subtle" hint that he is The Joker?Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
I'm sorry but it's your manner of play. I will treat veterans and new people alike.Natewolfman wrote:Im just not very good at mafiaIliad wrote: However one lurker and bandwagoner did catch my eye. Let's look at his track recordweather im scum, vig, doc, deputy, or just townie, ive tried voicing my opinion (got lynched twice doing this) I try staying quiet (got called out and lynched) I try semi-voicing my opinion like here but I honestly just dont have experience to know what Im doing and I get called out again? honestly look at my track record youll see it everywhare
I just dont see any of the clues you guys are at all, and 90% of the time these circumstantial claims lead to everyone lynching a townie. Obviously I have no clue what im doing nor how to learn better
I would like to know which one was the firstMinister Masket wrote:Is this the second time that Iliad has dropped a "subtle" hint that he is The Joker?Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.

Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
unvoteNatewolfman wrote:I think I need a tutor for online mafia![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
in any case, if i count right thats 4 against me (with 8 to lynch) anyone else wana add to the fire before im forced to make a final claim? I have nothing against anyone else, except that I can tell you that
pmc is completely innocent (as seen through night action)
that ought to help the town ga7
nagerous wrote:vote natewolfman
lynching a mod is always fun
oh... he's also acted scummy....
More like you were just bandwaggoning without a reason because you hadn't been reading it.nagerous wrote:unvote
I didn't read it properly.