Moderator: Community Team
OhMiGodUSuckspaceghst44 wrote:what does OMGUS mean?

I agree with this. But I really just dont know about Nate's claim. It's just weird. Then on the other hand Spiesr trying to out the cop was worse.Sierra_Leon wrote:I disagree. Spiesr has been acting way more scummier than Nate. Spiesr has claimed a doc-role, which is the easiest fake-claim in the books. Nate has claimed a cop-role, which might give us results tomorrow. I would rather lynch spiesr over Nate.
I'm already voting spiesr, and I'm keeping my vote there.
Sorry, been busy. The deadline was exactly about 20 hours ago. I will make an end-of-day scene later today, when I get back from badminton. Votes made after this post will no longer be counted.spiesr wrote:When exactly is the deadline?

Speisr, me and lsu? Still? I can't see how you can still suspect speisr, he voted for nate so hes probably on the wolves side if hes scum. Then would he really kill nate? Nate was the joint top suspect with him and by doing that hes eliminating the competition of course this is WIFOM but it doesnt sit right. Plus I think his claim is semi believable, certainly more so than nate's was.farside22 wrote:Well I wanted to see if Nate would have info. You got to laugh that the wolf(s) took him down. The question is, is spiers lying. Who else thought nate wasn't lying. Was his partner on the wagon.
I'm still thinking LSU and pmc are together. I need to look at who nate may have had as a buddy. I would be surprised if there was more then 2 of each group.
Pointing out the obvious, you had to agree with that or else you may as well of claimed nate's scum buddy.farside22 wrote:Nat's vote on PMC comes off as OMGUS.
farside22 wrote:I'm thinking more likely Nat is scum and Pmc is wolf but that is just me right now.
Both of these say to me, ok nate is scummy but lets look at these other people instead. Both times you start with nate then move onto the one you really want to get lynched.farside22 wrote: Not sure about Nat's claim. But seriously Spiesr last comment just deserves a vote on principle alone. YUCK!
I see a pattern emerging here. (Nate first etc.)farside22 wrote:Okay since I was asked this by a few people I will start with Nate and then move on to LSU and ace interaction.
2 "meh" s sounds like someone is trying to push nate into the background. The second one you say you don't believe in meta but then declare it a null tell on nate, contradicting yourself.farside22 wrote: Nate: Okay he says he read the game but glossed over the time limit. His unvote for drake was explained because he thought his vote would lynch him. (meh)This isn't helpful at all.Natewolfman wrote:ive been watching and reading all thisi just havnt had a need to post anything
Talks about how it's normal for him not to talk much day 1. Meh I don't believe in meta but if you do it all the time it's a null tell.
Now thats more like it, although you couldn't say all good things now could youfarside22 wrote:I really don't like this comment. Scum is more concerned if they vote for a townie because they look scummy.i unvoted because i had voted for drake (I think?) and it was a random vote, he had like 2 others after me so i took it off since i didnt want to accidently aid in that lynch, simple as that, however I didnt have sufficient evidence to condem ani either, so take that as you mayLets mark all the bad things on this quoteNatewolfman wrote:*sigh* Im the deputy (though i wasnt told who the main investigation role is) It works the same only on an every other day basis, and now if you dont lynch me i will likelly die in the night (unless the Dr. protects me lol, last time i claimed i was the doc so that didnt help me) of course if you see someone hammer me and my role is proven you will know who your real mafia probably is
1) telling PR's what to do
2) plea to emotion
3) if you look like scum and someone hammers and you are what you say it does not mean auto scum hammered.
Did you have to say that twice lol.farside22 wrote: Nates vote on pmc was definately OMGUS vote.
Everytime you say something bad about nate you immeadiately sa yno wait hang on a minute or you say "get a sense" you rarely commit to saying this is scummy and when you do you always then presesnt him in another light.farside22 wrote:He needs to state better reasoning. The problem with reading nate for me is I really got very little from him. He doesn't say much and when he talks I feel like this big foot is in his mouth. I do get a sense that Nat's claim is weak, but I will say something that is a bit WIFOM comment. If I was scum forced to claim and wanted to out a PR. I would just claim straight up cop so my scum partner knows who to kill.
Now it's possible there is only one mafia. This was a 14 player game and I'm going on the assumption that there may be 2 mafia and 2 wolfs. Seems a bit high but I think likely.
Based on my full read Nate is up there as scum, but not my number 1 scum suspect.
Read as:spiesr wrote:pmchugh makes a decent case against farside22, but scum may make cases against townies they want lynched. Also, pmchugh could be a werewolf trying to wipe out the mafia. But it still seems like a decent case.