Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
That may well be the case. I've certainly not got anything against them. However, there is strong evidence, in my opinion, of them "playing against others instead of each other when the situation doesn't warrant it". I've never played against either of them previously, but if they are doing that (even without specifically discussing it), then that qualifies as "secret diplomacy". And their massive winning percentage in their games together does suggest that. If the mods disagree, then I'm ok with that.Kotaro wrote:.....
HAHAHA
That was me LOLing at Tammy, wrex, and Poison, all monster Feudal War players, being accused of all being multis and conducting secret diplomacy.
The reason it's always one of those two winning is, uh, because they're good, and the other players are crap.
I'm sorry that you're too stupid to even be able to read my initial post, but no...I have not lost to either of them. In fact, our current game is very much in doubt.Kotaro wrote:Strong evidence that yes, they do indeed play a lot.
And did you even look at the games? One of them, Poisonous86 accused Tammy DeLee of cheating in one of them. Another, the game was obviously a fluke win because of a stupid player.
I'll edit in more thorough "lolevidence" later, but you obviously did no research. This is a case of, you lost to one of them, got pissed, used game search, said "omg they play a lot", and posted it. Next time, come with an actual reason, other than just being pissy over a game loss.
Guys let just be nice until a mod changes this to [CLEARED]Woodruff wrote:I'm sorry that you're too stupid to even be able to read my initial post, but no...I have not lost to either of them. In fact, our current game is very much in doubt.Kotaro wrote:Strong evidence that yes, they do indeed play a lot.
And did you even look at the games? One of them, Poisonous86 accused Tammy DeLee of cheating in one of them. Another, the game was obviously a fluke win because of a stupid player.
I'll edit in more thorough "lolevidence" later, but you obviously did no research. This is a case of, you lost to one of them, got pissed, used game search, said "omg they play a lot", and posted it. Next time, come with an actual reason, other than just being pissy over a game loss.
So, is this just your usual ass-act (which you do so well) or did you have a real point?
Yes, i read your first post. Funny how you're the one who wrote this up, and I'm the stupid one. So, I'll ask you again; did you even bother to look at any of these games?Woodruff wrote:
I'm sorry that you're too stupid to even be able to read my initial post, but no...I have not lost to either of them. In fact, our current game is very much in doubt.
So, is this just your usual ass-act (which you do so well) or did you have a real point?
Just thought that was funny and needed quoting2008-11-01 19:51:58 - Tammy DeLee: whats the world coming to when the tombstones can't attack each other!
2008-11-04 17:32:35 - Tammy DeLee: your attacking me from the witch huih?
2008-11-04 17:32:41 - Tammy DeLee: no fair!
2008-11-04 17:32:56 - Tammy DeLee: your supposed to tell us these things lol
Nope, he just sucksThey also play a lot of games with a wrexham, who NEVER WINS (so I suppose he should be looked into also, now that I think about it)
No doubt, you're going to lose. You're stuck between powerhouse Poison, and constantly building Tammy, and you're pissed Tammy won't help you by smashing him/her-self into Poison and give you a chance.I'm posting this while the game is most certainly in doubt, so this is not a case of sour grapes.
OwnedKotaro wrote:Woodruff wrote:No doubt, you're going to lose. You're stuck between powerhouse Poison, and constantly building Tammy, and you're pissed Tammy won't help you by smashing him/her-self into Poison and give you a chance.I'm posting this while the game is most certainly in doubt, so this is not a case of sour grapes.
Hilarious really. haha, all your games posted as "evidence" are pretty shitty evidence.

Not really...all Kotaro is showing is that he's biased. I'm not "stuck between Poisonous86 and Tammy DeLee at all. In fact, I am off to the side. Poisonous86 has actually had BETTER access to attack Tammy than I, given the positions...yet he has completely bypassed her and not attacked at all. Meanwhile, Tammy has simply built up on my border with her and completely ignored Poisonous. Neither one is making any attempt at all against the other, even to border protect much. I am the focus of both (my border, in Tammy's case, as she is not actively attacking me either).king sam wrote:OwnedKotaro wrote:Woodruff wrote:No doubt, you're going to lose. You're stuck between powerhouse Poison, and constantly building Tammy, and you're pissed Tammy won't help you by smashing him/her-self into Poison and give you a chance.I'm posting this while the game is most certainly in doubt, so this is not a case of sour grapes.
Hilarious really. haha, all your games posted as "evidence" are pretty shitty evidence.
Of course not! After all...rank makes right.LFAW wrote:The True Conqueror of CC will never cheat, nor will Poisonous86
No, what I have done, is make you look like a complete fool. You claim they are conducting secret alliance, and than, the evidence you provide has them fighting in Game Chat about the each other conducting secret alliances. And the rest, are either games where they're defeated long before the final outcome, or completely clean-cut looking games. Next time you want to accuse someone, you might try something other than "big old tammy and meanie Poison play a lot of games together", because, guess what, a lot of people play games with opponents that aren't shit as many times as possible. It's called competition.Woodruff wrote:
Not really...all Kotaro is showing is that he's biased. I'm not "stuck between Poisonous86 and Tammy DeLee at all. In fact, I am off to the side. Poisonous86 has actually had BETTER access to attack Tammy than I, given the positions...yet he has completely bypassed her and not attacked at all. Meanwhile, Tammy has simply built up on my border with her and completely ignored Poisonous. Neither one is making any attempt at all against the other, even to border protect much. I am the focus of both (my border, in Tammy's case, as she is not actively attacking me either).
Woodruff wrote: Not really...all Kotaro is showing is that he's biased. I'm not "stuck between Poisonous86 and Tammy DeLee at all. In fact, I am off to the side. Poisonous86 has actually had BETTER access to attack Tammy than I, given the positions...yet he has completely bypassed her and not attacked at all. Meanwhile, Tammy has simply built up on my border with her and completely ignored Poisonous. Neither one is making any attempt at all against the other, even to border protect much. I am the focus of both (my border, in Tammy's case, as she is not actively attacking me either).
Kotaro wrote:No, what I have done, is make you look like a complete fool.
This is entirely irrelevant, as their arguing about secret alliances in one game would not preclude their doing so in other games.Kotaro wrote:You claim they are conducting secret alliance, and than, the evidence you provide has them fighting in Game Chat about the each other conducting secret alliances.
Look Kotard...I've made my case, and you've made yours. I'm perfectly happy allowing one of the moderators to look at this and make their judgement (which I will accept). I'd suggest you do the same. Their far more likely to not be nearly as biased as either you or I are.Kotaro wrote:And the rest, are either games where they're defeated long before the final outcome, or completely clean-cut looking games. Next time you want to accuse someone, you might try something other than "big old tammy and meanie Poison play a lot of games together", because, guess what, a lot of people play games with opponents that aren't shit as many times as possible. It's called competition.
Thank you for your informative and eminently useful addition to this thread. I don't know what we'd have done without you.DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID wrote:Yo woodruff, tammy doesnt cheat--shes just better then you so get over it
Look, Woodfuckface (hey see, I can purposely misspell names for the use of flames too!), I've made you look like an idiot, so stop making bitchy posts. Why would they fight about secret diplomacy, drawing attention to each other, if they didn't want to be caught? Why would Poison make a thread about it (supposedly)? So that the moderators could check through that game and see theirs? Apparently, you're not only accusing them of being biased towards each other, but stupid as well.Woodruff wrote:
Look Kotard...I've made my case, and you've made yours. I'm perfectly happy allowing one of the moderators to look at this and make their judgement (which I will accept). I'd suggest you do the same. Their far more likely to not be nearly as biased as either you or I are.
Excuse you? Oh, I see...in all sincerity, that was NOT intentional on my part. I apologize right here and now in front of everyone for that, because it was not meant that way. It was an honest typo, whether you want to believe it or not.Kotaro wrote:Look, Woodfuckface (hey see, I can purposely misspell names for the use of flames too!)Woodruff wrote: Look Kotard...I've made my case, and you've made yours. I'm perfectly happy allowing one of the moderators to look at this and make their judgement (which I will accept). I'd suggest you do the same. Their far more likely to not be nearly as biased as either you or I are.
So unlike me, you're NOT willing to just let the moderators handle it. You seem to be awfully wrapped up in this in a personal way, Kotaro...very odd. It's enough to make one wonder WHY you'd be so concerned...Kotaro wrote:I've made you look like an idiot, so stop making bitchy posts. Why would they fight about secret diplomacy, drawing attention to each other, if they didn't want to be caught? Why would Poison make a thread about it (supposedly)? So that the moderators could check through that game and see theirs? Apparently, you're not only accusing them of being biased towards each other, but stupid as well.
Again, your evidence for "Secret Diplomacy", consisted of shit. Your entire accusation is solely based one game, because the after 12 or so you posted don't look to mean shit. Maybe you should learn what "BE SURE BEFORE YOU ACCUSE" means in the template given when making a thread.
Cause he made you look the Idiot you areWoodruff wrote:So unlike me, you're NOT willing to just let the moderators handle it. You seem to be awfully wrapped up in this in a personal way, Kotaro...very odd. It's enough to make one wonder WHY you'd be so concerned...

I'm sure.Woodruff wrote:
Excuse you? Oh, I see...in all sincerity, that was NOT intentional on my part. I apologize right here and now in front of everyone for that, because it was not meant that way. It was an honest typo, whether you want to believe it or not.
hahaha. You seem to think that anything said in this thread has any bearing on what the Multi-hunters will do. They'll investigate on their own. The reason I'm posting is because you obviously haven't read the template for making this thread., specifically:So unlike me, you're NOT willing to just let the moderators handle it. You seem to be awfully wrapped up in this in a personal way, Kotaro...very odd. It's enough to make one wonder WHY you'd be so concerned...
Your evidence: Fail.Be sure before you accuse someone!
no its more likeKotaro wrote:a.sub, It's always "Kotaro: 1, Everyone else: 0"
Woodruff wrote:Excuse you? Oh, I see...in all sincerity, that was NOT intentional on my part. I apologize right here and now in front of everyone for that, because it was not meant that way. It was an honest typo, whether you want to believe it or not.
Just because you're not man enough to apologize when you screw up doesn't mean I'm not. The fact that I immediately apologized in public would tell a person of even limited intelligence that it was sincere. Oh, you make a good point.Kotaro wrote:I'm sure.
Woodruff wrote:So unlike me, you're NOT willing to just let the moderators handle it. You seem to be awfully wrapped up in this in a personal way, Kotaro...very odd. It's enough to make one wonder WHY you'd be so concerned...
No, fortunately I recognize that the moderators are intelligent enough not to take anything you do seriously. For instance, your desire to hijack this thread with your incessant desire to pretend to be someone that has a valuable opinion.Kotaro wrote:hahaha. You seem to think that anything said in this thread has any bearing on what the Multi-hunters will do.
Actually, you seem to be the one doing the flaming.Kotaro wrote:Yet you accuse two very known and respected Feudal War monster players of being multi's. And now that I've shown you the "folly of your ways", you're resorting to now putting me under suspicion. And all the while, you can't seem to put up a strong argument without flaming all the way through.
That doesn't even make basic logical sense. If the two aren't doing anything wrong, then that's how the moderators will rule. It's as simple as that. If Kotaro has made me look like an idiot (which I disagree with you on), then his continuing to rant about it doesn't change that one iota. Kotaro's acting so concerned isn't because he made me look like an idiot, it's because he's an ass, plain and simple. In fact, his actions in this thread are an outstanding example of why people do not enjoy this site.king sam wrote:Cause he made you look the Idiot you areWoodruff wrote:So unlike me, you're NOT willing to just let the moderators handle it. You seem to be awfully wrapped up in this in a personal way, Kotaro...very odd. It's enough to make one wonder WHY you'd be so concerned...
Thank you very much for your fine addition to this thread! It's high degree of relevance is very appreciated. I don't know how this thread could have carried forward without your input here.sailorseal wrote:This is terrible, once again another thread is turned into flame wars!
I have created a suggestion to end this nonsense...