[FINAL] 2009 Clan League - THOTA are Champions!

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Jan 30-09

Post by jpcloet »

Standings updated for Jan 30-09
User avatar
peanutsdad
Posts: 718
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 9:16 pm
Gender: Male
Location: behind you

Re: 2009 Clan League - Started!

Post by peanutsdad »

Knight2254 wrote:The clan league should really be a mix of singles, doubles, trips, and quads. Having it all doubles is just silly.



This was all discussed in the CLA before it got started, and everyone agreed that to start it out we had to go with the doubles league. Like Jp said, we have to actually complete a full season and see how it goes before we should even think about discussing any changes in the format.
Image
User avatar
ClockworK
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 9:54 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Jan 30-09

Post by ClockworK »

JP,

is there any way you could hold back on updating the Standings until the end of the played week? I think it would be less work for you, and it would be nice to see the results after each weeks games are wrapped up for everyone...it gives the players a clearer vision of where they stand from week to week....some teams finish their games quick while others are slower, and it would be nice to see updates uniformly.

just my opinion....comments?

btw, great work on the league...it has made CC that much better!
Image
Founder of The Legion
Legion's Tournament Director
Highest Score: 1588
User avatar
Bruceswar
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Jan 30-09

Post by Bruceswar »

ClockworK wrote:JP,

is there any way you could hold back on updating the Standings until the end of the played week? I think it would be less work for you, and it would be nice to see the results after each weeks games are wrapped up for everyone...it gives the players a clearer vision of where they stand from week to week....some teams finish their games quick while others are slower, and it would be nice to see updates uniformly.

just my opinion....comments?

btw, great work on the league...it has made CC that much better!


I always though JP was just doing an update about 1 time a week. Whatever games had ended he would count up, and those not ended would be counted next time he checked. Seems logical.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Jan 30-09

Post by jpcloet »

Some games take a while to complete. Almost all games in Week 1 are done except for one that will likely take another week or so to complete. Several other series are already finished in Week 2. Unless we fix settings to Esc, which we all agree not to, there's no way to tell when they'll finish. Right now if I did post end of Week 1, I'm not sure how relevant it would be as some teams are already on week 4.
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by jpcloet »

Updated, interesting to note that the top 2 clans THOTA and ID face off as we speak in week 3.
User avatar
japser_be
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 8:27 am
Location: Belgium

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by japser_be »

hopefully we do better than a tie this time :)
after a proud ID now a proud...
Image
User avatar
Blitzaholic
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Starting Jan 17th 2009

Post by Blitzaholic »

jpcloet wrote:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3372/3256614490_dbd002d6cb_o.jpg

[bigimg]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3372/3256614490_dbd002d6cb_o.jpg[/bigimg]



shouldn't it go by winning percentages and not wins as we have played less games :?:


think about it, how can we be half a point back with a 70% win rate :?


the system is flawed or you made a mistake, we played 9 less games and all we have to do it win about 50% or 5 of 9 and be tied for 1st? again, this cant be right mathmatically if you go by winning % and stat odds.
Last edited by Blitzaholic on Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Optimus Prime
Posts: 9665
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Optimus Prime »

The system is not flawed if it was intentionally designed to rank clans according to total wins. Some rankings use winning percentage, others use total wins. Just because you want to be on top doesn't mean the system is flawed, Blitzaholic.
User avatar
Blitzaholic
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Blitzaholic »

Optimus Prime wrote:The system is not flawed if it was intentionally designed to rank clans according to total wins. Some rankings use winning percentage, others use total wins. Just because you want to be on top doesn't mean the system is flawed, Blitzaholic.



it is not that I want to be on top, it is a matter of prinicple and understanding, i am confused :?

we played 9 games less than 1st place and if we won 5 and lost 4 we would be tied???????

makes no sense as winning 5 and losing 4 is not that good really, but just a wince above average, yet , according to this, if we do that, we tied for 1st? doesnt that seem odd?

and 3rd place team says 11-8 and only 1 game back???????
it should be more than 1 game back from 12-7, say the 12-7 team lost, and is now 12-8, that is 1 game, but still better than 11-8, so it should be at least 1.5 from the 12-7 record
and 11-8 would be even more back then a 7-3 record.
Last edited by Blitzaholic on Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by jpcloet »

Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.

Think about it this way then.

ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500

Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)

You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.
Knight2254
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:21 pm
Gender: Male

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Knight2254 »

Why don't you just finish your games and then we'll be able to see who is really in first. This is just a temp scoreboard anyways.

Oh, and just FYI -- GB = ((WinsA-WinsB) + (LossesB-LossesA)) / 2

Thus.. you are

((12-7) + (3-7) ) / 2

( (5) + (-4) ) /2

(1) / (2)

= .5 games back
User avatar
Blitzaholic
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Blitzaholic »

jpcloet wrote:Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.

Think about it this way then.

ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500

Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)

You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.



and 3rd place team says 11-8 and only 1 game back???????
it should be more than 1 game back from 12-7, say the 12-7 team lost, and is now 12-8, that is 1 game, but still better than 11-8, so it should be at least 1.5 from the 12-7 record
and 11-8 would be even more back then a 7-3 record.


re-read
Image
User avatar
Blitzaholic
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Blitzaholic »

Knight2254 wrote:Why don't you just finish your games and then we'll be able to see who is really in first. This is just a temp scoreboard anyways.



I would if the dragoons would join my game, been waiting over a week now
Image
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by jpcloet »

12-7 to 12-8 is only a move of a .5 game.
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by jpcloet »

ID can join as slowly as they like, I am watching the games though.

12-7 vs 11-8, if the second team wins, being 1 back is now even. 12-8 and 12-8. It's only a full game if the teams are playing each other.
Knight2254
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:21 pm
Gender: Male

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Knight2254 »

Blitzaholic wrote:
jpcloet wrote:Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.

Think about it this way then.

ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500

Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)

You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.



and 3rd place team says 11-8 and only 1 game back???????
it should be more than 1 game back from 12-7, say the 12-7 team lost, and is now 12-8, that is 1 game, but still better than 11-8, so it should be at least 1.5 from the 12-7 record
and 11-8 would be even more back then a 7-3 record.


re-read


The third place team = (12 - 11) + (8 - 7) / 2

(1) + (1) /2

=2/2
= 1 game back.


Games, assuming you have played equal games, is all based off of the loss column.

Thus, if team one was 10-5 and team two was 11-4, team two would be 1 game back because that's the difference in the loss column.

It's just math.
User avatar
jpcloet
Posts: 4317
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by jpcloet »

Nice and clear knight. Not a big fan of baseball, but the questions are good. Keep winning at 70% and I'm sure your clan will do just fine Blitz.
User avatar
Blitzaholic
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Blitzaholic »

jpcloet wrote:ID can join as slowly as they like, I am watching the games though.

12-7 vs 11-8, if the second team wins, being 1 back is now even. 12-8 and 12-8. It's only a full game if the teams are playing each other.



oh, ok, thanks

makes more sense now, it is a half a point, not a point



I was getting confused
that 12-7
and 11-8 only 1 game back?
i was thinking, huh? if dragoons played a game and lost, that is a game, but they would be 12-8 which is better than 11-8 and 0.5 points ahead still, which is right, but the game played was played, yet, they lose lets say, but are still ahead, but if the other team was 1 back, and 1st places loses, see my dilemma, I was over thinking it, i get it now, it would be half a point

but, I see what you are saying now, forget it, i am driving myself mad :lol:

I get IT :idea: yippee =D>
Image
User avatar
Fireside Poet
Posts: 2671
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:49 pm

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Fireside Poet »

All of the ID vs THOTA games have been filled since yesterday and they were sent late last Sunday to us. Let's not exacerbate unnecessarily.
Image
Click this logo for more information on joining!
TheBro
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The dark side of the moon.

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by TheBro »

Yes Blitz is obsessed with being #1....


But he's totally right here! Not sure about the baseball argument, doesn't the team with a better win % rank higher?

Whatever, it's funny to see Thota in second, even funnier that the Dragoons are in first! :lol:
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.
jarrett155
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:25 pm
Contact:

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by jarrett155 »

looking at the list i think it may be wins-losse = number used for ranking.
User avatar
Bruceswar
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Bruceswar »

Looks like Immortal Assassins might be the first clan to go 10-0 in any week. :D 1 game is being remade, as it was made a standard and nobody caught it. LOL But barring a loss there should be 10-0. :D
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Bones2484
Posts: 2307
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:24 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA (G1)

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by Bones2484 »

TheBro wrote:But he's totally right here! Not sure about the baseball argument, doesn't the team with a better win % rank higher?


No. Baseball assumes 50/50 split. As was said, by your logic a team that is 1-0 would be in first place.

Right now, Dragoons have 5 more wins and 4 more losses than THOTA. Meaning THOTA should be a half game behind, as they are.

The standings are correct, but who cares? It only matters who is on top at the end. If THOTA is that concerned with their current place, perhaps they can finish off a few more games?
User avatar
hwhrhett
Posts: 3120
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:55 pm
Gender: Male
Location: TEXAS --- The Imperial Dragoons

Re: 2009 Clan League - Standings Feb 5th-09 (ID now leads)

Post by hwhrhett »

Bones2484 wrote:
TheBro wrote:But he's totally right here! Not sure about the baseball argument, doesn't the team with a better win % rank higher?


No. Baseball assumes 50/50 split. As was said, by your logic a team that is 1-0 would be in first place.

Right now, Dragoons have 5 more wins and 4 more losses than THOTA. Meaning THOTA should be a half game behind, as they are.

The standings are correct, but who cares? It only matters who is on top at the end. If THOTA is that concerned with their current place, perhaps they can finish off a few more games?


we are playing against thota right now... for week 3, so im sure it will be straightened out soon. although even by win percentages we are in second. we are not doing bad at all, and im shocked that people are surprised that we are doing well, lol.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Complete Challenges”