Moderator: Community Team
Is it just me or does you saying "some townies" seem to imply that you are excluded from the townie population. Why not just say some people?mpjh wrote:Because some townies have powers that allow them to investigate at night, and I am curious about whether they learned anything. If they don't want to share, that is fine, but I thought I would try.
Wuh? Did you just reveal that your a power roleace1217 wrote:I highly suspect nagerous is not the red cult leader.
No your reading too much into it.captainwalrus wrote:Is it just me or does you saying "some townies" seem to imply that you are excluded from the townie population. Why not just say some people?mpjh wrote:Because some townies have powers that allow them to investigate at night, and I am curious about whether they learned anything. If they don't want to share, that is fine, but I thought I would try.
Maybe I did, maybe I didn't.pmchugh wrote:Wuh? Did you just reveal that your a power roleace1217 wrote:I highly suspect nagerous is not the red cult leader.![]()
For the benifit of everyone i think that you should go back and paste it herempjh wrote:We can get around to that. Right now, I am not going to go back and cut and paste the past conversation about you here, but will, if you persist and don't go read it yourself. I am more interested in finding out whether anyone learned anything last night.
I wrote the post in which I unvoted before kage's third no lynch vote was up. He posted it while I was writing, so that's why my vote on him is also in a separate post immediately after it.mpjh wrote:OK, on Stroop i cut and pasted below the three summary posts that I agree with. Stroop was too eager to either get a no lynch bandwagon going and then just switched away from that. When he saw things were not going his way, he just dropped out of the conversation and got into the weeds. I may have more later.
captainwalrus wrote:Unvote
Vote stroop
He is very suspicious. First he tried to vote no lyinch to save himself because the situation was very good following mpjh's no lynch vote. Then, once he realised how suspicious it looked, he changed and claimed to think it was odd that there was 3 votes for no lynch. Very suspicious.
You come up with the greatest evidence. This is just derfderf not understanding sarcasm.derfderf34 wrote:yes at the beginning of one of his posts he said that he would try to convince us to vote no lynch and then unvoted his no lynchcaptainwalrus wrote:Unvote
Vote stroop
He is very suspicious. First he tried to vote no lyinch to save himself because the situation was very good following mpjh's no lynch vote. Then, once he realised how suspicious it looked, he changed and claimed to think it was odd that there was 3 votes for no lynch. Very suspicious.
I've already reacted to this post:farside22 wrote:I really don't get this:
Why would this be part of someone's role. You can target someone to kill but if successful you die too? Why on earth would anyone kill a player then?I can kill someone from the target clan. If I try and kill someone not from the target clan, I die.
I just had to ask.
Lets see those who hopped on the BW. derf always stands out. Probably because of another game I saw him in. Ace is pretty much on my list of those who I wonder if he will scum hunt list.
Lots of quick unvotes and people just out and out believing the claim without asking more question. Stroop and pmc stand out on this.
So
vote: Stroop
Stroop wrote:Oh? If you'll look back, you'll find that I asked several questions, and as long as they remain unanswered I don't want him lynched. Hence why I said I think the claim is plausible, for now.farside22 wrote:Lots of quick unvotes and people just out and out believing the claim without asking more question. Stroop and pmc stand out on this.
Yes.spiesr wrote:Ace, did you just reveal your exact role or are you lying for no good reason?