Moderator: Community Team
Working class.sailorseal wrote:I knew this would attract some intelligence![]()
So what should I put instead of poor?

Isn't that more a term for middle classflashleg8 wrote:Working class.sailorseal wrote:I knew this would attract some intelligence![]()
So what should I put instead of poor?
Not in the UK. A quick wikipedia check shows that for the US you have do have the working class sometimes equated with middle class. Two nations divided by a common language again!sailorseal wrote:Isn't that more a term for middle classflashleg8 wrote:Working class.sailorseal wrote:I knew this would attract some intelligence![]()
So what should I put instead of poor?


TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
If you don't mind me asking (just out of curiosity), how old are you?sailorseal wrote:I knew this would attract some intelligence![]()
So what should I put instead of poor?
exactlyjonesthecurl wrote:IF what you're asking is people's income, ask their income.
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Why do I seem intelligent or ignorant?LYR wrote:If you don't mind me asking (just out of curiosity), how old are you?sailorseal wrote:I knew this would attract some intelligence![]()
So what should I put instead of poor?
I virtually guarantee that there are no upper crust members who spend their time hanging around on an online Risk forum.sailorseal wrote:Who are the other three upper upper class people?
Why not?Frigidus wrote:I virtually guarantee that there are no upper crust members who spend their time hanging around on an online Risk forum.sailorseal wrote:Who are the other three upper upper class people?
Yessailorseal wrote:Why do I seem intelligent or ignorant?LYR wrote:If you don't mind me asking (just out of curiosity), how old are you?sailorseal wrote:I knew this would attract some intelligence![]()
So what should I put instead of poor?
Indulging in hookers and blow trumps hanging out with a bunch of strange people on the internet.InkL0sed wrote:Why not?Frigidus wrote:I virtually guarantee that there are no upper crust members who spend their time hanging around on an online Risk forum.sailorseal wrote:Who are the other three upper upper class people?
Rich people can't prefer Risk over drugs, as well as having a fulfilling sex life with their girlfriend(s) (or just be female)?Frigidus wrote:Indulging in hookers and blow trumps hanging out with a bunch of strange people on the internet.InkL0sed wrote:Why not?Frigidus wrote:I virtually guarantee that there are no upper crust members who spend their time hanging around on an online Risk forum.sailorseal wrote:Who are the other three upper upper class people?
You might try reading something written after 1920....flashleg8 wrote:What technical distinction? Money, education, housing ownership, parental class, job? Sorry but from a Marxist perspective there is really only two classes: Bourgeois (owners of the means of production: capitalists) and proletarian (producers: workers). I doubt there are any people on this forum that are bougeois. Pretty much ALL of you are proleterian.got tonkaed wrote:as a word of warning, people often screw up self reporting.
Also a lot of people dont really understand the technical distinction of what puts you into each strata in terms of classification.
P.S. To the OP - your poll doesn't even have working class as an option?! Poor(!) Your class loyalties are obvious!
Hey! Rich people are people too. They just have more stuff and other perksFrigidus wrote:I virtually guarantee that there are no upper crust members who spend their time hanging around on an online Risk forum.sailorseal wrote:Who are the other three upper upper class people?
I guess I technically was lower-upper until I graduated, got a job and moved out on my own. My younger brother still lives with Mom and Dad and never has less than 4 games going for ten minutes at a stretch.Frigidus wrote:I virtually guarantee that there are no upper crust members who spend their time hanging around on an online Risk forum.sailorseal wrote:Who are the other three upper upper class people?
Really? My grandfather was a small-time dairy farmer. He owned his land, tools, cattle, etc, but probably made less than he would have if he'd worked a 40 hour week on an assembly line. Is he Bourgeois? How about the President of a major company who makes millions of dollars a year, but doesn't own any significant amount of stock; i.e. control of the means of production. Is he a prol?flashleg8 wrote:What technical distinction? Money, education, housing ownership, parental class, job? Sorry but from a Marxist perspective there is really only two classes: Bourgeois (owners of the means of production: capitalists) and proletarian (producers: workers). I doubt there are any people on this forum that are bougeois. Pretty much ALL of you are proleterian.got tonkaed wrote:as a word of warning, people often screw up self reporting.
Also a lot of people dont really understand the technical distinction of what puts you into each strata in terms of classification.
P.S. To the OP - your poll doesn't even have working class as an option?! Poor(!) Your class loyalties are obvious!