Moderator: Community Team
Children, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.P Gizzle wrote:i think it'll be a war to end most, if not all, wars....
Iran will nuke up, so will N. Korea......
the rest of the world will nuke up and BOOM!!!!
most cities are gone, and then, we rebuild.....
And its relations with ex-Soviet countries are thinning. It's in an natural gas dispute with Ukraine,Kokunai wrote:I felt Russia deserved it's own post.
Russia has been slowing moving back to it's communist past due to the economic strain of switching to democracy and they will without a doubt make it back there. They however are not friendly to the west, sure they put on a good show but they meet with the enemies of the West regularly and send them weapons and equipment to use against us they are major factor to destabilization in that region they refuse to let go of the fact that they were once a super power and are no longer though they are searching for that glory back again. They may attain it but it will be through war because re-establishing themselves into the old territory of the USSR will not do it. When the world does not recognise them as a super power they will go on the offensive to prove it if they do then Iran is on their list of allies.
China will side with them as they have nothing to lose from the destruction of the west nor the oil that Iran will undoubtedly supply them in the war effort. This is highly speculative but a very real possibility as Russia recently doubled military spending. They are developing technologies along the same line as us in ICBM interception, though we have pretty much dropped it thinking ICBMs unlikely delivery systems, they seem to think the threat is real. Hence the hike in spending to go towards researching those options. Russia is just as much a threat as Iran and N.Korea just not as obvious yet.
Children, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.Not at all. I just like the way that Venezuela has got the US to provide their military budget.Kokunai wrote:you mocking my previous posting?Genghis Khant wrote:I like that, nice and neat.Kokunai wrote:Little fact about Citgo. Our military is actually contracted with them...all of our bases have citgo stations exclusively...Last year the profits to Venezuela were 10 billion. Their military spending last year...10 billion.
CNN, experts?
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
Can you tell us about these predictions? Such as details, and who's doing the predicting?Caleb the Cruel wrote:There are two major predictions that kind of invlove warfare that I kind-of believe, but I won't fully believe unless they happen.
The first prediction is the Explosions of 2007 & 2008.
The second prediction is the War of 2036.
qeee1 wrote:Then again we'll probably all be nuked so fast we won't have time to pick sides.
I sincerely believe that nukes will never be used on a large-scale level. I can see remote fractions of terrorists using them but for the most part, people seem to know what a nuclear war would mean and therefore don't have the guts to go through with any.strike wolf wrote: Truth is no one is ever going to actually use nukes in war
Edit: no one has the balls to use em because they know what it meands..
I agree with most of this as the world stands at this moment. But, my scenario relies on the Israel making a strike at Iran which will galvanize the Iranian people against us. The cartons showed just what little it takes to arouse the anger of the Muslim population centers, you underestimate their fervor. China will side with N.Korea for it's own gains no doubt about that. The railing against Israel is nothing new in that region it has been going on since ancient times they hate them plain and simple all in the region do. If I am wrong name me a single empire or country that has ruled in that region that has been friendly to Israel. They do want the destruction of Israel even their people do to a certain extent.areon wrote:Of course Iran is trying to aquire the bomb. They want to share the prestige that Pakistan, the only other Islamic nation to my knowledge, enjoys of having them. I would say that Pakistan's tensions with India are greater and yet they haven't used the bomb. It isn't fair to assume that Iran will use these weapons which aren't even going to be available for how long, estimates around 20 years until they have the final product? The anti-Israel is just a scapegoating to cover up their own human rights violations and other inequities; other than sponsoring terrorists what have they deliberately done against Israel?
China's history of collusion with North Korea hasn't been to support the North Koreans but to offset our influence in the area. We supported Kai-Shek and didn't acknowledge their nation status until Nixon. They didn't even help out the North Koreans until we had overrun their country and deliberately stopped their advance at the South Korean border. I think China might be the largest donor of aid to North Korea but they aren't pressuring Kim to help his people, their own people are being subjected to draconian standards. They aren't allies, just a political tool being used.
The cartoon's effect wasn't that drastic. Protests are happening all the time because Islam is on a decline. They feel a need to speak out openly, it is typical for the powerless to latch onto anything. In France the situation has more to do with them having no jobs, education, or training than it does with their religion. Your earlier post of Europeans being involved policing their own countries...they aren't immigrating to Europe as some grand scheme. When you have no standing in society it is easy to lash out in a group but this does not mean they support extremist views. Spain and the other nations didn't pull out of Iraq because of dissident populations. If they needed to NATO could still deploy its forces.
Sorry that I thought you were insinuating Iran was ready to start another mujahideen movement. But I don't see any other way for your arguments that Iran is ready to start a war. If it was serious, they wouldn't stop at nuking Israel. They would need to carry that kind of war out and I don't see their people wanting to do it.
I would like to just know your source then I will tear apart the argument cause I can guess your source.Caleb the Cruel wrote:There are two major predictions that kind of invlove warfare that I kind-of believe, but I won't fully believe unless they happen.
The first prediction is the Explosions of 2007 & 2008.
The second prediction is the War of 2036.
What makes you think Israel would actually strike Iran? They may well be the aggressors, depending on your viewpoint, in their wars with their smaller neighbours but the threats to Iran seem to me to be mainly posturing, it was over a year ago that Sharon set a deadline of March 2005 for Iran to stop nuclear enrichment before Israel attacked, and as of yet there has been no action.Kokunai wrote:But, my scenario relies on the Israel making a strike at Iran which will galvanize the Iranian people against us
No doubt in your mind maybe but I wouldn't be so sure thats the case for the politicians in Beijing. Having a stable neighbour who is not flooding their country with refugees and assists in keeping America from being the dominant military power in their region, which to be fair seems a reasonable expectation considering it's their region, is one thing. Siding with North Korea in a war with the rest of the world is quite another. China hardly supports North koreas military progress as was evident from the public wrist slapping they recieved over the nuclear tests last year. China looks for stability and avoidance of war in their relationship with Pyongpang, not for an ally in a global showdown.Kokunai wrote:China will side with N.Korea for it's own gains no doubt about that.
War doesn't work like that. WWII spread across half the globe but there wasn't two sides. There were many, with lots of subtle and ever changing relationships between them. China has no interest in fighting alongside Iran, sure 10 years ago Chinese companies may have been involved in Iranian weapons programmes to make a quick buck, but that is far different from shouldering arms together.qeee1 wrote: So anyway what'll the sides be?
USA+most of Europe+Japan+Australia+Isreal vs. China+Iran+Russia+N.Korea+most of middle East+possibly south America?
Thats marvellous. I kind of believe in lots of kind of things but wont fully believe in them unless they kind of happen. Remember though, he who does not believe will be condemned so, better safe than sorryCaleb the Cruel wrote:There are two major predictions that kind of invlove warfare that I kind-of believe, but I won't fully believe unless they happen.
Israel attacked Iraq when they built a reactor in the 80's. Sharon had health problems (stroke if I remember correctly) and is either dead or in a coma, I forget which, and don't have the time to look it up, anyway, he isn't in power, and the new leadership isn't as hawkish. But why I'm really posting is how you refer to Israel's "smaller" neighbours. When Israel was created, they were instantly attacked by Syria, Jordan, Saudi, Egypt, and Iraq, all MUCH larger. The six-day war, Israel pre-emptively struck Egypt, Syria and Jordan. The Yom Kippur war saw Syria and Egypt invade witout warning, and nearly succeeded in over-running the country. Only Lebanon is smaller than Israel in the area (the Palestinians really don't count, they don't have a true army, just terror groups). So don't make the mistake of thinking big Israel goes around bullying smaller Arab neighbours, it's the exact opposite.Bertros Bertros wrote:What makes you think Israel would actually strike Iran? They may well be the aggressors, depending on your viewpoint, in their wars with their smaller neighbours but the threats to Iran seem to me to be mainly posturing, it was over a year ago that Sharon set a deadline of March 2005 for Iran to stop nuclear enrichment before Israel attacked, and as of yet there has been no action.
Yes you are right to pull me up in this instance, if I'm honest it was intended to be inflammatory rather than accurate, and I'm not proud of that.Serbia wrote:Israel attacked Iraq when they built a reactor in the 80's. Sharon had health problems (stroke if I remember correctly) and is either dead or in a coma, I forget which, and don't have the time to look it up, anyway, he isn't in power, and the new leadership isn't as hawkish. But why I'm really posting is how you refer to Israel's "smaller" neighbours. When Israel was created, they were instantly attacked by Syria, Jordan, Saudi, Egypt, and Iraq, all MUCH larger. The six-day war, Israel pre-emptively struck Egypt, Syria and Jordan. The Yom Kippur war saw Syria and Egypt invade witout warning, and nearly succeeded in over-running the country. Only Lebanon is smaller than Israel in the area (the Palestinians really don't count, they don't have a true army, just terror groups). So don't make the mistake of thinking big Israel goes around bullying smaller Arab neighbours, it's the exact opposite.Bertros Bertros wrote:What makes you think Israel would actually strike Iran? They may well be the aggressors, depending on your viewpoint, in their wars with their smaller neighbours but the threats to Iran seem to me to be mainly posturing, it was over a year ago that Sharon set a deadline of March 2005 for Iran to stop nuclear enrichment before Israel attacked, and as of yet there has been no action.

I like that, you write it?heavycola wrote:"Well, the whole thing started at 3 o'clock fast,
It was all over by quarter past.
I was down in the sewer with some little lover
When I peeked out from a manhole cover
Wondering who turned the lights on.
Well, I got up and walked around
And up and down the lonesome town.
I stood a-wondering which way to go,
I lit a cigarette on a parking meter
And walked on down the road.
It was a normal day."