IS THEIR ANYTHING WRONG WITH THESE ACTIONS?

[sofuca]

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=179067

Basically red was just about to win the game, he controled most of the board and would have won in no more than 2 goes, so i pointed this out to Blue and we duely attacked red and stoped him getting any larger bonuses.

i went on to kill blue and then red and win the game and now red thinks this its totally unfair?

so what do you think?

please read the game log its only short.

thanks for reading!

[GoonSquadJeeves]

You should always play to win. In a 3 player or 3 players left game, the 2 weakest players should attack the strongest to survive. If you happened to come back and win the whole thing, that was your luck and skillful play. I think you're in the right.

[Evil Semp]

I seee nothing wrong with what you did.

[michaelthefinn]

I agree, except when its a terminator game, in which case i would rather kill the weaker one so to win his points before the stronger player does that way even if the stronger player kills me ill end up winning something o losing very little

[AAFitz]

of course you did the right thing...and the other guy shouldnt care, because he was dead the other way...at least you gave him a shot...he should have attacked you just a little sooner, or let you attack blue more...then he may have won...better than just dying without trying

and its not as if he didnt know you wanted to win....kind of implied

[Fircoal]

and its not as if he didnt know you wanted to win....kind of implied

What it is? And all this time I thought I wanted to lose. (jk)

[GENERAL COWARD]

im new okay, so im asking if their is an option to when two single players decide to attack the strongest third player, is there an option to tell game staff that when the 3rd player is dead that the game ends early, ie the two can team up in game?

if there isnt then eventually they have to kill each other off to end the round, so any teaming up is superficial, and a case of 'the enemy of my enemy is enemy still'