Moderator: Tournament Directors


That's absolutely something I have in mind, which is why the fourth post of the thread is reserved for pitcher records or anything else I feel like throwing in there. I don't think it will really be that hard to come up with that info, but I've been wrong before.dcc1220 wrote:I know this would be a lot of work, but as we get a little further in the season it would be cool to see a top ten for the best individual pitching records.
Just a thought.
only if ERA is includeddcc1220 wrote:I know this would be a lot of work, but as we get a little further in the season it would be cool to see a top ten for the best individual pitching records.
Just a thought.
its not like we arent use to it already :pgeigerm wrote:but I've been wrong before.
freakns wrote:only if ERA is includeddcc1220 wrote:I know this would be a lot of work, but as we get a little further in the season it would be cool to see a top ten for the best individual pitching records.
Just a thought.
Ouch ... not cool, not cool at all ...freakns wrote:its not like we arent use to it already :pgeigerm wrote:but I've been wrong before.
there is something wrong with this list! yes, i know what is wrong! i dont like it at allgeigerm wrote:
- Your current division leaders: Boston, Kansas City, LA Angels, NY Mets, Astros, and Brooklyn.
Battle of Actium is not even a real map... its a mess and of course everyone hates it! not like that dear prison *love*geigerm wrote:
- Clearly, we chose maps that other people really hate.
Funny, I find that list to be quite wonderful.freakns wrote:there is something wrong with this list! yes, i know what is wrong! i dont like it at allgeigerm wrote:
- Your current division leaders: Boston, Kansas City, LA Angels, NY Mets, Astros, and Brooklyn.
Right, 'cause everyone loves prison.freakns wrote:Battle of Actium is not even a real map... its a mess and of course everyone hates it! not like that dear prison *love*geigerm wrote:
- Clearly, we chose maps that other people really hate.
Dude, Houston definitely took the map I would have chosen, and LA has one that I would have picked as well. I hope I get to play them both.geigerm wrote:
- Your current division leaders: Boston, Kansas City, LA Angels, NY Mets, Astros, and Brooklyn.
- The one trend with all these teams so far is fantastic home records: the six of us have a combined 10 home losses. Clearly, we chose maps that other people really hate.
While I'm sad to see one of the best names in baseball history leaving the tourney, I've made the move, and Cuellar will take over after Shocker makes his fifth start.jwithington wrote:St. Louis "shocked" no one this week when they sent fifth starter Urban Shocker to the minors, replacing him with Mike Cuellar.
"Honestly, Urban was a gimmick--and we can't afford gimmicks at this point in the season," noted manager jwithington.
The line on the new pitcher:
#35 Mike Cuellar, Escalating, Unlimited, Foggy
I think the AL East is playing the NL East in interleague, so you'll miss both of those teams.jwithington wrote:Dude, Houston definitely took the map I would have chosen, and LA has one that I would have picked as well. I hope I get to play them both.
Now, Battle of Actium? That one is just wrong wrong wrong....
no, its not that bad... its actually worse!!!!!geigerm wrote:As for Actium, come on ... it's not THAT bad of a map.
It's been on an unscheduled vacation--I've had two of the worst weeks of work I can remember, had my kids and wife sick, and been sick myself since the last batch of games. So most of my time has been spent catching up on work and trying to make all of my turns in the games I'm playing.yemphan wrote:Anything going on with this tourney? It's been a while since I had games....