Moderator: Community Team
i said 'of course not'. that is defensive?Incandenza wrote:and he got all defensive and quiet when you asked him if he had any secrets to hide (beginning of day 2, IIRC)wicked wrote:more like quite guilty. I like how cowboy shut up quickly when I FOS'd him just for fun.
no, i was reading the 4 pages of posts that happened after that, involving mach's theory...wicked wrote:more like quite guilty. I like how cowboy shut up quickly when I FOS'd him just for fun.
I wasn't fishing! At the time RK looked wird. he volunteered a role. I didn't have to fish. If I was mafia, I would just take him out. If I was the SK, I would just take him out.wicked wrote:I posted mine... your fishing for info on townie power roles. Also, the high probability of you being mafia, since I think Cram and Mach are most likely townie.
leaving you where? lol you conveniently missed both groupsIncandenza wrote:Like cram, I've been working my way through the whole thread.
Unlike cram, I am a fast reader.![]()
wicked, mach, and cram seem pretty much in the clear. (If they're not, then I'll be ten times more paranoid the next time I play one of these.)
Which would mean that, given one SK and 2 remaining mafia, houssam, dccowboys, and ucabears are all bad guys.
of course i realize he was implying he's a towniesupercram wrote:he's implying that he's town, duh. i mean, with US.dcowboys055 wrote: leaving you where? lol you conveniently missed both groups
where are you, cowboy? is he right?
i don't necessarily like being grouped with anybody at this point, though i am highly inclined to trust both of these people, i don't have a whole lot to go on for that trust. i may yet burn for it.Incandenza wrote: wicked, mach, and cram seem pretty much in the clear. (If they're not, then I'll be ten times more paranoid the next time I play one of these.)
what i find interesting about your reactin is this:dcowboys055 wrote:what have i done to deserve blame?
and what have you 4 done to deserve each other's trust?