Moderator: Tournament Directors

I understand tricks and what not, which I don't mind in casual games, but I think that tournaments should not have double turns.MrMoody wrote:Sounds like the same old freestyle trick. If you join a freestyle turny be ready for it.
Well. Then you're saying that the freestyle setting should not be available to tournament organisers. Wouldn't it be simplier if you just didn't join freestyle tournaments and instead just joined tournaments using the seq. setting? Or am I missing something here?murphy16 wrote:I understand tricks and what not, which I don't mind in casual games, but I think that tournaments should not have double turns.MrMoody wrote:Sounds like the same old freestyle trick. If you join a freestyle turny be ready for it.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
I say not in tournaments because they are elimination based unlike casual games.Timminz wrote:That seems to me like a fairly arbitrary place to draw the line. Why is this particular tactic acceptable in public games, but not in tournaments?
Public games are elimination based. When you lose all your armies, you're out.murphy16 wrote:I say not in tournaments because they are elimination based unlike casual games.
Alright maybe I'm wrong. I guess I just don't know what I'm talking about.BaldAdonis wrote:Public games are elimination based. When you lose all your armies, you're out.murphy16 wrote:I say not in tournaments because they are elimination based unlike casual games.
You're right that there shouldn't be double turns. But they shouldn't exist anywhere. Tournaments aren't special.
I'm thinking about making another FS tourney and making double turns an automatic eliminationjpcloet wrote:Yes, however, if a TO said that double-turns would mean that the player would be disqualified, then you have something to think about for future FS tournaments.
Why not just make a torunament using the seq. setting then???murphy16 wrote:I'm thinking about making another FS tourney and making double turns an automatic eliminationjpcloet wrote:Yes, however, if a TO said that double-turns would mean that the player would be disqualified, then you have something to think about for future FS tournaments.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
Well. Then it would make sense to set up a speed tournament. In a 24 h freestyle, no one reasonably accustomed to freestyle would wanna make his move at the same time as his opponent. No matter what, a non-speed freestyle will degenerate into seq. play with the usual freestyle tactics such as de facto double turns.jpcloet wrote:Then you wouldn't be able to both play at the same time. If you did this, I suggest having timezones matching players up to give them a chance to play at the same time, or pick maps and Esc, that will make players want to take cards etc.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
How about you quit trying to shoot down jp's and my ideas. No one ever said you had to join the tournament.alstergren wrote:Well. Then it would make sense to set up a speed tournament. In a 24 h freestyle, no one reasonably accustomed to freestyle would wanna make his move at the same time as his opponent. No matter what, a non-speed freestyle will degenerate into seq. play with the usual freestyle tactics such as de facto double turns.jpcloet wrote:Then you wouldn't be able to both play at the same time. If you did this, I suggest having timezones matching players up to give them a chance to play at the same time, or pick maps and Esc, that will make players want to take cards etc.