Ohh, naughtyneanderpaul14 wrote:Vote Stroop because he voted for me
You display the behavior of scum that has been called out.
Moderator: Community Team
Ohh, naughtyneanderpaul14 wrote:Vote Stroop because he voted for me
No, he's technically extinct.Simon Viavant wrote:Does neanderpaul qualify as an animal?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:No, he's technically extinct.Simon Viavant wrote:Does neanderpaul qualify as an animal?


wikipedia wrote:The Neanderthal, or Neandertal, is an extinct member of the Homo genus that is known from Pleistocene specimens found in Europe and parts of western and central Asia.
lol, right. Sorry lots of graduation things going on as well as Modding a game and particitpating in two others........Simon Viavant wrote:The wikipedia link is obviously a conspiracy by world leaders who don't want us to know neanderthals still exist.
They've spread misinformation everywhere to cover it up.
Anyway, don't we have a lynching to do?
Someone is being pretty quiet. I find that highly suspect
You're right. I'll retract my claws...for now. unvoteSimon Viavant wrote: Anyway, don't we have a lynching to do?
That's good thinking! Could just be a coincidence, but certainly raises suspicions. It's so hard to tell on the first day, just have to keep talking and gathering as much info as possible!captainwalrus wrote:Vote Suspect. I always find it suspicious when someone is accused of being quite and then immedietly that person replies. It makes it seem like he is following the thread, but not saying anything, lest he be scummy.
Sharing the floor is definitely a good thing, too much talking from one person and I would think they are just trying to cover something up or overcompensate for the usual mafia method of not talking very much. But on that note don't give up on voicing your opinions or suspicions. The more we share now the better off we are after the first night, because then the results of the lynching are known, and we also know that whoever is killed during the night was telling the truth.Suspect101 wrote:but I have put in my two cents. Not to mention this is a game for new players and I do not want to scare them off as I am usually quite agressive and abrasive. I want more players to come to mafia not leave so I am trying to let most of the new players do most of the talking. remember I was mafia in the terrorist one and was quite agressive, as I try to be in every game. Me being quite does not say that I am mafia, it says I would rather share the floor.
It seems you got most of the people to let you get away with this, but not me. You're obviously lurking (and admit to it, to make things easy) and you're trying to clear yourself by saying "I play differently when I'm scum, you know that.".Suspect101 wrote:lol, right. Sorry lots of graduation things going on as well as Modding a game and particitpating in two others........Simon Viavant wrote:The wikipedia link is obviously a conspiracy by world leaders who don't want us to know neanderthals still exist.
They've spread misinformation everywhere to cover it up.
Anyway, don't we have a lynching to do?
Someone is being pretty quiet. I find that highly suspect
but I have put in my two cents. Not to mention this is a game for new players and I do not want to scare them off as I am usually quite agressive and abrasive. I want more players to come to mafia not leave so I am trying to let most of the new players do most of the talking. remember I was mafia in the terrorist one and was quite agressive, as I try to be in every game. Me being quite does not say that I am mafia, it says I would rather share the floor.
haha, I actually thought I was supporting suspect when he was being attacked by a couple of others for not talking enough. If suspect is a vet and doesn't want to do all the talking I think that is understandable. Replying directly after someone says you aren't talking enough seems suspicious to me, but certainly not enough to make me vote for him. I am never quick to vote, especially on day one, because you gather information by talking (not ending the day early). I played two games on here a couple of years ago, and quick votes were almost always bad for the town.Simon Viavant wrote:While this could be an exception, it's highly unlike suspect to be quiet when he's mafia.
There is some other conspiracy here to pin the blame on suspect.
My biggest suspect right now is sully.
He hasn't been talking much and just comes in now to attack suspect.
Another scumtell is that they usually don't vote on someone right away when they come out against them, as if they're considering matters. They usually get another couple people to vote first so they're safer from blame.
vote sully
I do believe I unvoted earlier, but if not, I will do it now.pmchugh wrote:Vote Count!
sully800 1 - (simon viavent)
fuzzy pungui 2 - (sespect101, Mr Squirrel)
Mr. Squirrel 2 - (fuzzy P, aceartemis)
suspect101 3 - (falkomagno, captainwalrus, stroop)
Not voting- neanderpaul, sully
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch.
I'm tending to agree with you here sully. Suspect did get a lot of votes a bit too quickly it seems. I agree he has acted scummy, but I would rather see a little bit more concrete evidence before we lynch him. Lynching someone after only 3 pages of discussion seems a bit risky to me.sully800 wrote:haha, I actually thought I was supporting suspect when he was being attacked by a couple of others for not talking enough. If suspect is a vet and doesn't want to do all the talking I think that is understandable. Replying directly after someone says you aren't talking enough seems suspicious to me, but certainly not enough to make me vote for him. I am never quick to vote, especially on day one, because you gather information by talking (not ending the day early). I played two games on here a couple of years ago, and quick votes were almost always bad for the town.Simon Viavant wrote:While this could be an exception, it's highly unlike suspect to be quiet when he's mafia.
There is some other conspiracy here to pin the blame on suspect.
My biggest suspect right now is sully.
He hasn't been talking much and just comes in now to attack suspect.
Another scumtell is that they usually don't vote on someone right away when they come out against them, as if they're considering matters. They usually get another couple people to vote first so they're safer from blame.
vote sully
Suspect did gather a lot of votes quickly, which would make me more suspicious of the people doing the voting. If you find a mafia member, especially in the beginning it is hard to gather support to lynch that person. It seems like a lot of people want to lynch suspect, so my suspicions of him are decreasing. FOS at Falko, Stroop, and Captainwalrus.
Votes don't have to lead to a lynch. They are a way to apply pressure and gather information. Suspect shouldn't get away with staying silent, so in this case my vote is a reminder that he can't.sully800 wrote:Suspect did gather a lot of votes quickly, which would make me more suspicious of the people doing the voting. If you find a mafia member, especially in the beginning it is hard to gather support to lynch that person. It seems like a lot of people want to lynch suspect, so my suspicions of him are decreasing. FOS at Falko, Stroop, and Captainwalrus.
Second:captainwalrus wrote:confirm.
This is a lame reson for voting for me, especially since there was 45 minutes between when he posted and when I replied. It was simple timing of that I was on and able to reply. You are trying to use the fuel that SV stated and trying to make a run at getting me lynched.captainwalrus wrote:Vote Suspect. I always find it suspicious when someone is accused of being quite and then immedietly that person replies. It makes it seem like he is following the thread, but not saying anything, lest he be scummy.