Moderator: Community Team
unvote vote suspect If there is anyone I do not think is scum in this game it is mr. squirrel. He has played 100% townie IMO and you gave incredibly weak reasons, how about quoting and giving some actual thought behind it. What happened to your big posts? This is out of character for you and I can easily see you being scum.Suspect101 wrote:vote mr.squirrel
He has been urging on each bandwagon while remaining in the shadows. I have a bad feeling about mr.squirrel and would like to see some pressure on him.
Looking for bandwagons much?spiesr wrote:After a quick look back at yesterday, I feel a possible situation being that pmc was scum and led the charge against MM and that Mr. Squirrel was his scum mate and came to save him by joining the MM bandwagon. I will vote Mr. Squirrel for now to further explore such possibilities...
I knew I was town but wasn't sure about MM, what would you do in my place?Thezzaruz wrote:Forcing a bad lynch to save yourself is kind of scummy tbh. But seeing as it's still early days of D2 and a few other leads needs to be considered I'm not voting just yet.pmchugh wrote: Anyway I think a review of yesterday is needed and I will be the first to admit that the lynch of mm wasn't the best but it was kind of all I had and if I hadn't went after him I would have probably been lynched.
For starters, you forgot to bold your vote against me.spiesr wrote:After a quick look back at yesterday, I feel a possible situation being that pmc was scum and led the charge against MM and that Mr. Squirrel was his scum mate and came to save him by joining the MM bandwagon. I will vote Mr. Squirrel for now to further explore such possibilities...
you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?pmchugh wrote:unvote vote suspect If there is anyone I do not think is scum in this game it is mr. squirrel. He has played 100% townie IMO and you gave incredibly weak reasons, how about quoting and giving some actual thought behind it. What happened to your big posts? This is out of character for you and I can easily see you being scum.Suspect101 wrote:vote mr.squirrel
He has been urging on each bandwagon while remaining in the shadows. I have a bad feeling about mr.squirrel and would like to see some pressure on him.
Looking for bandwagons much?spiesr wrote:After a quick look back at yesterday, I feel a possible situation being that pmc was scum and led the charge against MM and that Mr. Squirrel was his scum mate and came to save him by joining the MM bandwagon. I will vote Mr. Squirrel for now to further explore such possibilities...
I knew I was town but wasn't sure about MM, what would you do in my place?Thezzaruz wrote:Forcing a bad lynch to save yourself is kind of scummy tbh. But seeing as it's still early days of D2 and a few other leads needs to be considered I'm not voting just yet.pmchugh wrote: Anyway I think a review of yesterday is needed and I will be the first to admit that the lynch of mm wasn't the best but it was kind of all I had and if I hadn't went after him I would have probably been lynched.
I disagree big posts and round robin vote hopping is IMO the most efficient technique for finding scum. It's a lot easier not to slip up if you sit in the background, but even as scum it's less intresting. Why are you protecting speisr? And I didn't say he did bandwagon I said he was looking for a bandwagon, he picked out a newbie who was just accused and me who is probably the easiest player to BW atm.Suspect101 wrote:you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?
I changed my mind entirely, my whole instict says you are scum.And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window
You didn't seem to think I was scummy before I accused you, or at least you seemed to think Mr. Squirrel was more suspicious. So go on BS me and tell me your fake reason for vote changing.suspect101 wrote:you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders
pmchugh wrote:I disagree big posts and round robin vote hopping is IMO the most efficient technique for finding scum. It's a lot easier not to slip up if you sit in the background, but even as scum it's less intresting. Why are you protecting speisr? And I didn't say he did bandwagon I said he was looking for a bandwagon, he picked out a newbie who was just accused and me who is probably the easiest player to BW atm.Suspect101 wrote:you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?
I changed my mind entirely, my whole instict says you are scum.And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window
You didn't seem to think I was scummy before I accused you, or at least you seemed to think Mr. Squirrel was more suspicious. So go on BS me and tell me your fake reason for vote changing.[/quote]suspect101 wrote:you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders
You are the first person to jump on people and call them scum for vote hopping, but when you do it there is a reason? You are changing your norms, so you must be scum (by your deduction of me doing the same thing).pmchugh wrote:I disagree big posts and round robin vote hopping is IMO the most efficient technique for finding scum. It's a lot easier not to slip up if you sit in the background, but even as scum it's less intresting. Why are you protecting speisr? And I didn't say he did bandwagon I said he was looking for a bandwagon, he picked out a newbie who was just accused and me who is probably the easiest player to BW atm.Suspect101 wrote:you have been the scummiest player in this game and your round robin vote hopping is not helping either. I wonder why a scumy person thinks another player has "played 100% town". Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril, way to jump the gun on that one. Interesting how you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders. And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window. Also my "big posts" really got me far haven't they? ever consider that people may change their stratagey to try and find a more efficent means to the ends?
I changed my mind entirely, my whole instict says you are scum.And I guess we can just throw that whole hubbub about you thinking I am town out the window
I notice you are not voting me yet, but I garuntee you will for the very reason you just accused me:
You didn't seem to think I was scummy before I accused you, or at least you seemed to think Mr. Squirrel was more suspicious. So go on BS me and tell me your fake reason for vote changing.suspect101 wrote:you like to swing the light of suspicion towards people who have accused you or your defenders
Where did I accuse anyone of vote hopping?Suspect101 wrote:You are the first person to jump on people and call them scum for vote hopping, but when you do it there is a reason? You are changing your norms, so you must be scum (by your deduction of me doing the same thing).
I am posting less content not less in general, your theory is deadwood and should be burned as such.
No, I am not going to vote for you because I want to hear more about Mr.Squrril. So go BS yourself. Should be fun and will probably amuse you for hours.
Oh, by the way, your instincts stink.
What else do you want to know? Your whole case against me is that I was defending PMC. I gave my opinion on this already. I thought MM was scumnier than PMC so I voted against MM. Simple as that. However, since MM turned out to be innocent, I am no longer trying to defend PMC. If you read through all of my posts so far for day 2, you will find that I have not defended PMC once yet even if he is defending me.Suspect101 wrote:No, I am not going to vote for you because I want to hear more about Mr.Squrril.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Can you give specific examples of how I've been "remaining in the shadows"? I agree that I have urged for the lynch in a couple cases (just as you or anyone else has), but I don't ever remember lurking.Suspect101 wrote:vote mr.squirrel
He has been urging on each bandwagon while remaining in the shadows. I have a bad feeling about mr.squirrel and would like to see some pressure on him.
I read back... as far as I can tell, nagerous wasn't really a threat to anybody. he put a random vote on Falkomagno (because "he didn't know him yet"Mr. Squirrel wrote:Who would have wanted nag dead? I'm gonna have to read back through the thread when i get the chance.
MM, Clive and Iliad i consider goodguys.Stroop wrote:Minister Masket - 4 (spiesr, pmchugh, AceArtemis, Mr. Squirrel)
pmchugh - 3 (Minister Masket, Thezzaruz)
Thezzaruz - 3 (Clive, Falkomagno, Iliad)
karelpietertje - 1 (nagerous)
spiesr wrote:Actually, i meant to vote for him and I will fix it now. Vote Mr. SquirrelSuspect101 wrote:Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril,
Suspect does bring an interesting point that we may want to look into somewhat of pmc retaliating against those who attack him or his defenders. Whether this is reasonable self defense or something a little more is unclear and open for discussion...

What if me, MM and thez are all town? Then scum could vote for any or none of us without giving anything away. Just because MM was town doesn't mean scum were on his wagon.karelpietertje wrote:I read back... as far as I can tell, nagerous wasn't really a threat to anybody. he put a random vote on Falkomagno (because "he didn't know him yet"Mr. Squirrel wrote:Who would have wanted nag dead? I'm gonna have to read back through the thread when i get the chance.) and a vote on me.
so I don't think we can get a lot of valuable information out of this kill.. which is obviously exactly what thebad guys would wantyou roll your eyes likes it's obvious but there can be many many reasons to kill players off.
so let's look back at the lynch:MM, Clive and Iliad i consider goodguys.Stroop wrote:Minister Masket - 4 (spiesr, pmchugh, AceArtemis, Mr. Squirrel)
pmchugh - 3 (Minister Masket, Thezzaruz)
Thezzaruz - 3 (Clive, Falkomagno, Iliad)
karelpietertje - 1 (nagerous)
Clive couldnt be counterclaimed for being Legolas, Iliad voted away from MM when he could've pretended to just be offline.
so if the bandits bandwagonned, it was on Minister Macket.
therefor, we should try and found out who, out of spiesr, pmchugh, AceArtemis, is/are bandits.
so that was my first thought.
spiesr wrote:Actually, i meant to vote for him and I will fix it now. Vote Mr. SquirrelSuspect101 wrote:Also, spiesr never voted mr.squrril,
Suspect does bring an interesting point that we may want to look into somewhat of pmc retaliating against those who attack him or his defenders. Whether this is reasonable self defense or something a little more is unclear and open for discussion...
when suspect and spiesr brought this up, it totally attached to my first thought, squirrel fits into it!
he could be one of the two bandits who bandwagonned Minister Macket, with either pmchugh or AceArtemis (or spiesr if him bringing this up is a decoy) or 2 of those!
therefor I would like to put some pressure on Squirrel:
vote Mr Squirrel
sorry but I feel like you haven't read my post correctly...pmchugh wrote:What if me, MM and thez are all town? Then scum could vote for any or none of us without giving anything away. Just because MM was town doesn't mean scum were on his wagon.
karelpietertje wrote:vote Mr Squirrel

No I did understand you.karelpietertje wrote:sorry but I feel like you haven't read my post correctly...pmchugh wrote:What if me, MM and thez are all town? Then scum could vote for any or none of us without giving anything away. Just because MM was town doesn't mean scum were on his wagon.
I didn't state MM wasn't town, and i said nothing about thez.
I'm just stating that I suspect that the bandwaggon was by Mr. S, and one of the others who voted MM.
this second person could be you or spiesr or aceartemis.
I want to pressurize Squirrel first. I think he either went with AceArtemis or you (pmchugh). out of those two, I must admit I don't think you are scummy... but that's not the issue I'm trying to get going here yet.
first, let's see who Mr. Squirrel is.
so follow this example everybody:karelpietertje wrote:vote Mr Squirrel
The only reason MM was lynched was because of the deadline. You try to place the blame on me, when it wasn't my fault we lost him. I may have contributed unfortunately, but if we had a few more days to figure out the situation, I don't think I would have stuck with MM. The case was too weak and the only reason I voted for him in the first place is because Thez made him look scummy. If thez had never voted, I wouldn't have either.karelpietertje wrote:sorry but I feel like you haven't read my post correctly...pmchugh wrote:What if me, MM and thez are all town? Then scum could vote for any or none of us without giving anything away. Just because MM was town doesn't mean scum were on his wagon.
I didn't state MM wasn't town, and i said nothing about thez.
I'm just stating that I suspect that the bandwaggon was by Mr. S, and one of the others who voted MM.
this second person could be you or spiesr or aceartemis.
I want to pressurize Squirrel first. I think he either went with AceArtemis or you (pmchugh). out of those two, I must admit I don't think you are scummy... but that's not the issue I'm trying to get going here yet.
first, let's see who Mr. Squirrel is.
so follow this example everybody:karelpietertje wrote:vote Mr Squirrel
We know who bandwagoned MM. Well, we know who voted for him anyway, whether those votes can be considered bandwagon votes or something else is up for debate. The question is are any of those who voted for him scum who voted for him because they wanted to make sure he was lynched as opposed to the other possible lynches like pmc or maybe thezzz.karelpietertje wrote:I'm just stating that I suspect that the bandwaggon was by Mr. S, and one of the others who voted MM.
you're right. they didn't need to.pmchugh wrote:there are many reasons why we may have voted for him and it doesn't neccesarily mean one or two of us is scum. Espicially when scum didn't need to vote for him to get a townie lynched.

You may have a point there. This seems like what a newbie scum would do. Although there is a lot of WIFOM involved, I think we should discuss this.sam_levi_11 wrote: Yesterday Nag was quite hard and harsh on Karel, calling him newbie scum. This was because we was obviously avoiding the topic. A claim to which he still hasnt answered, seeming to hope this new day will mean we forget. Along with this, if he was newbie scum, being this his first/second game, certainly first as scum, he is likely to kill whoever was getting close to finding him out. It often happens with newbie scum and i think Karel simply panicked and killed him to protect himself. This, coupled with the fact he obviously avoided the topic despite neither forgetting about it or being busy and how he has been on every bandwagon in the shape of a vote or fos means im going to vote karel
From the quotes sam posted, the vote on KP wasn't just a vote. It seemed like nagerous had a strong opinion that you were being scummy. KP tried to make his vote sound trivial. Vote: KP because I want to see him respond to sam's accusations.karelpietertje wrote:I read back... as far as I can tell, nagerous wasn't really a threat to anybody. he put a random vote on Falkomagno (because "he didn't know him yet"Mr. Squirrel wrote:Who would have wanted nag dead? I'm gonna have to read back through the thread when i get the chance.) and a vote on me.

Maybe I go a bit OTT but one wrong deadline lynch doesn't mean i am not adequate. However I think I may calm down a little in games as I probaby am too forward.Iliad wrote:Wow.
Is it possible for anyone to post without getting accused of being scum by pmc?
As someone who had just led the bandwagon onto , what I presume, an important power role pmc is hardly abashed. He's throwing out accusations just like before.
If anyone even dares to vote someone who you consider town, the shock!, instantly they are demonised. Could we please try and discuss things with slightly more rational heads? Especially since last day proved your scum finding skills weren't really that adequate.
I'm surprised the kill was been mostly ignored. Karel was pressured by nag, and it was quite obvious nag was sure karel was scum. Also karel has been suggesting the birds mean that scum know about something about the town roles. No-one else has been suggesting this. If karel is newbie scum, him revealing that would fit quite in line.
Not only that if karel is scum, and they knew nag was a watcher they would've had to kill nag as they would be sure nag would watch karel. It seems to me that the night kill shows that karel was caught in a corner.