Moderator: Community Team
YOU'RE THE QUEEN OF SHEBA!??!?!?Minister Masket wrote:Yeah sure, and I'm the Queen of Sheba.johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Oh dang why didn't I think of making random spam to make it longer.hecter wrote:It isn't out intention, but what the longest thread thread is now isn't simply being or becoming the longest thread. It's something different, something more. If it wasn't, you guys would just be sitting there making post of after post that meant nothing, such as "2308944u890sdafkljasd;lfkja".strike wolf wrote:Umm...I thought those guys at the other thread deny wanting to be the longest thread. that it "wasn't their intention".Iliad wrote:While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.Insomnia!! wrote:Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
The longest thread got a head start and is still behind, stop whining.xelabale wrote:Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.Insomnia!! wrote:Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Someone obviously wasn't here when Akiceman deleted Spamalot.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Aah. One of the truly great moments of competent and thoroughly considered decisions by a moderator.strike wolf wrote:Someone obviously wasn't here when Akiceman deleted Spamalot.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Yes I personally guarrantee that merging them would turn out worse than when AK deleted Spamalot.Night Strike wrote:Merging the threads would probably break the forum. Which would then lead to a CC version of World War 3.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Even with the setback from AK IcemanMeDeFe wrote:The longest thread got a head start and is still behind, stop whining.xelabale wrote:Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.Insomnia!! wrote:Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
I have a very strong urge to kill you right now...spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged
<- img courtesy of Zoebear1Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything
and while Spamalot has said repeatedly that it doesn't care if it's the longest or not. The main goal of the Longest thread is just that. Plus they've both evolved into unique entities with their own, though often overlapping, social groups.Iliad wrote:Even with the setback from AK IcemanMeDeFe wrote:The longest thread got a head start and is still behind, stop whining.xelabale wrote:Yes but that's no fun. I wanna see a bitch fight fair and square.Insomnia!! wrote:Spamalot isn't designed to be the longest thread in the forum, that isnt its purpose. Read the first post in each thread, and you'll very quickly gather that they have very different goals.xelabale wrote:I changed my mind, I think they should both be deleted - then you could start again at the same time and have a race.
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Man can you argue well.targetman377 wrote:Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything
that is not true!!!!!!
I find this extremely offensive!!!!!! i'm going to report it as soon as possible!!!!!Iliad wrote:Man can you argue well.targetman377 wrote:Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything
that is not true!!!!!!
Can't debate against all those exclamation marks.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
You're just being bigoted against exclamation marks!!!!!!! And you're a hypocrite!!!!!!!!Skittles! wrote:I find this extremely offensive!!!!!! i'm going to report it as soon as possible!!!!!Iliad wrote:Man can you argue well.targetman377 wrote:Iliad wrote:
But yeah-the two threads are just two different threads for people to have random conversations about anything
that is not true!!!!!!
Can't debate against all those exclamation marks.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.