meh I really can't care until I'm in the gamepmchugh wrote:shut it fircoal, your not helping the no talking situation here.
anfd stop fastposting me!
Moderator: Community Team
meh I really can't care until I'm in the gamepmchugh wrote:shut it fircoal, your not helping the no talking situation here.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
YAY! Another game after this one is finished?Fircoal wrote:add me in or DIE!!!

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Provided that you be quiet for the duration of this one, of course.mandalorian2298 wrote:YAY! Another game after this one is finished?Fircoal wrote:add me in or DIE!!!

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
da, but I want in now. then I could do what I did in ur Dr. Who rt mafia XDmandalorian2298 wrote:YAY! Another game after this one is finished?Fircoal wrote:add me in or DIE!!!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
It wouldn't make for a quick hammer unless someone else voted with you.Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.
Why walrus?Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.
For lurking and jumping on just about every bandwagondittoeevee8888 wrote:Why walrus?Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.
I have to admit that is true. However ditto has been just as silent. She has just been more conservative with her votes.Simon Viavant wrote:For lurking and jumping on just about every bandwagondittoeevee8888 wrote:Why walrus?Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Is there a problem with being more conservative?Mr. Squirrel wrote:I have to admit that is true. However ditto has been just as silent. She has just been more conservative with her votes.Simon Viavant wrote:For lurking and jumping on just about every bandwagondittoeevee8888 wrote:Why walrus?Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.
YEAH ITS BORING!!!!dittoeevee8888 wrote:Is there a problem with being more conservative?Mr. Squirrel wrote:I have to admit that is true. However ditto has been just as silent. She has just been more conservative with her votes.Simon Viavant wrote:For lurking and jumping on just about every bandwagondittoeevee8888 wrote:Why walrus?Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.
Not at all, I was just stating the difference between you two and why you look much less scummy.dittoeevee8888 wrote:Is there a problem with being more conservative?Mr. Squirrel wrote:I have to admit that is true. However ditto has been just as silent. She has just been more conservative with her votes.Simon Viavant wrote:For lurking and jumping on just about every bandwagondittoeevee8888 wrote:Why walrus?Simon Viavant wrote:Well then problem solved.
FOS walrus as a vote would possibly make a quick hammer.
Also, there are four of us so it's 3 to lynch.
supposedly, he should be back soon.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Should we aim for CW then? If the fact that he has to leave for twenty minutes seems more than a little scummy.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
In a rush are we?Simon Viavant wrote:I give him until Mandy gives the 10 minute warning
And then you want us to bandwagon himSimon Viavant wrote:I thought it was still a few minutes away. I say give him till the 5 minute warning
In that case, I sense another no lynch. By the time he catches up and properly defends himself, it will be almost time up.Simon Viavant wrote:I thought it was still a few minutes away. I say give him till the 5 minute warning
That's the other option.dittoeevee8888 wrote:And then you want us to bandwagon himSimon Viavant wrote:I thought it was still a few minutes away. I say give him till the 5 minute warning