Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880

we have been unequivocal in our support of the mods and will not entertain the hijacking of this democratic election by anti-mod bad seeds; it is the expectation of the community that the ombudsman will support and provide democratic legitimacy to the mods in their decisions to surgically remove problem usersjefjef wrote:It would be impossible to channel the true desires of all into a single representative. many many thousands represented by a single voice. Unrealistic at best. If the true idea is for true representation I would suggest a congress with individuals from every country and clan. But it unrealistic to represent ALL players with one voice. Too many different views as you and I know. BTW. C C is a business and we are it's customers. They own it and should have complete say so. If I may add they are VERY liberal with there policies and some of our actions. Yours, mine and others. We have voices as individuals/CUSTOMERS and I for one will not willingly relinquish my voice to another for a GAME that I PAY to PLAY.
let's not play the "who did it first" gamesomeguy wrote:i suggested this a long time ago
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
who is this we? and again, what do you truly know about a community that you have been a member of for a month? again, i doubt anyone has turned to you to help with the election of an ombudsman. if they have, i would love for you to post their names, so i can contact them and they can explain to me how you are the person to take up this task... yeah, i'll be waiting for that list... i am sure you can just make a PDF of the petition they sent you, begging for you to speak for the forum community... feel free to pm that to me or just post it here in the thread... *cough* *cough*...-0saxitoxin wrote: we have been unequivocal in our support of the mods and will not entertain the hijacking of this democratic election by anti-mod bad seeds; it is the expectation of the community that the ombudsman will support and provide democratic legitimacy to the mods in their decisions to surgically remove problem users

So you want members to elect someone who will then take that position and support the moderators when a member is banned from the community? Nevermind the fact that it's not the moderators who ban people, I don't think the community is going to like this idea.saxitoxin wrote:we have been unequivocal in our support of the mods and will not entertain the hijacking of this democratic election by anti-mod bad seeds; it is the expectation of the community that the ombudsman will support and provide democratic legitimacy to the mods in their decisions to surgically remove problem users
Certainly they could elect someone else then.Night Strike wrote:So you want members to elect someone who will then take that position and support the moderators when a member is banned from the community? Nevermind the fact that it's not the moderators who ban people, I don't think the community is going to like this idea.saxitoxin wrote:we have been unequivocal in our support of the mods and will not entertain the hijacking of this democratic election by anti-mod bad seeds; it is the expectation of the community that the ombudsman will support and provide democratic legitimacy to the mods in their decisions to surgically remove problem users
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Biased much?saxitoxin wrote:noted and logged (fyi, I won't be updating the candidate list after every nomination, just periodically - but here is an update)
the 3 players on the candidate list are now as follows:
- Saxitoxin
- colton24
- Timminz
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed

Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Exactly. So Saxitoxin better get to work on putting together that ballot. Maybe in a new thread with a poll.colton24 wrote:sorry to burst your bubble but that is all of damn CC

disqualified; nominations are limited to 3 per person per the rules of the Central Elections TribunalStiffMittens wrote:I have a few users to nominate as well. They are all listed here:
http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=scoreboard
Please update your list of candidates to reflect my nominations.
the nominee list is now:StiffMittens wrote: I nominate OWENSHOOTER
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
...Meaning you.saxitoxin wrote:disqualified; nominations are limited to 3 per person per the rules of the Central Elections TribunalStiffMittens wrote:I have a few users to nominate as well. They are all listed here:
http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=scoreboard
Please update your list of candidates to reflect my nominations.

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
LOLZsaxitoxin wrote:updated list:
- Saxitoxin
- colton24
- owenshooter
- Timminz
- bogangod
- woodruff
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed