Moderator: Community Team
Don't be greedy, one PR per person.pmchugh wrote:Wait, will's in this game? unvote vote will
But stroop is too? unvote vote stroop, no unvote vote will.
I can't decide! unvote vote stroop.
That's 3 PR's and a vote on stroop please.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Unvote, Vote: Suspect101 for promising serious thoughts when we are still in random voting.Suspect101 wrote:just got back from a week with the inlaws................ I need to un pack and read what has been said. My posting will contain sufficent thoughts no later than tomorrow noon EST.
Serious thoughs should never be discouraged no matter how random your thoughts currently are.AceArtemis wrote: Unvote, Vote: Suspect101 for promising serious thoughts when we are still in random voting.
While I agree with you, being too serious too early can be a scumtell because it can show that someone is trying too hard to act townie.Thezzaruz wrote:Serious thoughs should never be discouraged no matter how random your thoughts currently are.AceArtemis wrote: Unvote, Vote: Suspect101 for promising serious thoughts when we are still in random voting.![]()
Vote AceArtemis
I unvote Talapus. I find the random stage rather trying. Active mafia can boost their presence early on whilst having an 'excuse' for scummy behavior. Only threat of death can create sober discussion, so I vote AceArtemis.AceArtemis wrote:While I agree with you, being too serious too early can be a scumtell because it can show that someone is trying too hard to act townie.
1. A two-vote bandwagon is not a threat of death. It, like an FoS, is an indication that you've got your eye on me.Nzen wrote:I unvote Talapus. I find the random stage rather trying. Active mafia can boost their presence early on whilst having an 'excuse' for scummy behavior. Only threat of death can create sober discussion, so I vote AceArtemis.AceArtemis wrote:While I agree with you, being too serious too early can be a scumtell because it can show that someone is trying too hard to act townie.
Then you should have said so and not just complain about him promising a thought through post.AceArtemis wrote: I was trying to get a response out of Suspect.
could you be anymore wishy-washy? At least Ace attempted to come up with a reason to vote for me. It was obvious what he was doing.Thezzaruz wrote:Then you should have said so and not just complain about him promising a thought through post.AceArtemis wrote: I was trying to get a response out of Suspect.
However I do miss the promised post so here comes an UnVote and a Vote Suspect101, let's see some serious thought.
Was I still going to give out PRs for this? I don't remember....so I'll just flip a coin, heads for PR, tails for no PR.Fircoal wrote:Unvote Vote: Tal I'm pretty sure he's scum :3
Good enough for me.Suspect101 wrote: Anyways:
I was gone for a week, posted a short blurb in each game that I was in telling people I would post something the next day. I had not read the game thread, nor knew what had been said, just wanted to make ammends for me being absent.
I did post and continued on with the joke vote with one of my own. But if I missed something, and there should have been serious talks about what was said, please inform me. From what I could tell there was nothing but joke votes and trash.
Day 1 will last forever if you don't put a deadline, so I think it's best to cap it at about 2 to 2 1/2 weeks. That's just me though./ wrote: By the way, around how long should day one last for large games?
Three weeks (from the start of day)?/ wrote:By the way, around how long should day one last for large games?
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
what are you talking about? It should be lots of of fun to vote for him while he is gone. Don't you think that would be a nice preset for him when he got back seeing that he doesn't have to catch up in a 5-10 page forum again.Stroop wrote: unvote - there's no fun in voting pmc if he's not here.
ok skittles is having a double tampon day, ill guess ill unvoteSkittles! wrote:I'm just skimming over everything. I've been emotionally and mentally hacked the past week so I haven't been posting normally. So once I feel super-duper I'll post.

Yea sorry about that, I actually missed that you had made that second post.Suspect101 wrote: I did post and continued on with the joke vote with one of my own. But if I missed something, and there should have been serious talks about what was said, please inform me. From what I could tell there was nothing but joke votes and trash.
Hiding behind others??? I was the first to jump on AA for his vote on you and the only one to (wrongly I admit) jump on you for not posting. How do you get that to be "hiding"???Suspect101 wrote: but Thezz just seems to be hiding behind what other people said.