The tournament, the first atleast, will be 1v1. It will be a big tournament (or small), no maximum number of players.
The idea is to let the players start and play they game they want to. Even against players outside of the tournament itself. All 1v1 games from the day the tournament starts count. In order to limit the possibilties to cheat it will be only allowed to play the same player once (of course you might play many times outside of the tournament but in the tournament the first game counts)
In order to limit the abillity to abuse the system it will only be allowed to play 5 games per map (and total of 10 games per "strange map")
The number of games will be optional. But a minumum of 50. The time to play the 50 games will be a month. All games within the month will count. (except the limitations)
The way we keep score is my own way to keep score.
I can explain in more detail later. But you calculate your score vs the opponents and thus can get a "break-even-score".
When your score-increes with 0.0 points. It will show your maximum score as a 1v1 player (if you play as good or as bad in the 50 or more games)
I will need the players to submit their games at every 10 games so we can keep track. I will look into the best players inorder to have no cheating. I will not have to look into all players.
What do you think of this kind of tournament? What else will be good or what is bad?
The tournament, the first atleast, will be 1v1. It will be a big tournament (or small), no maximum number of players.
The idea is to let the players start and play they game they want to. Even against players outside of the tournament itself. All 1v1 games from the day the tournament starts count. In order to limit the possibilties to cheat it will be only allowed to play the same player once (of course you might play many times outside of the tournament but in the tournament the first game counts)
In order to limit the abillity to abuse the system it will only be allowed to play 5 games per map (and total of 10 games per "strange map")
The number of games will be optional. But a minumum of 50. The time to play the 50 games will be a month. All games within the month will count. (except the limitations)
The way we keep score is my own way to keep score.
I can explain in more detail later. But you calculate your score vs the opponents and thus can get a "break-even-score".
When your score-increes with 0.0 points. It will show your maximum score as a 1v1 player (if you play as good or as bad in the 50 or more games)
I will need the players to submit their games at every 10 games so we can keep track. I will look into the best players inorder to have no cheating. I will not have to look into all players.
What do you think of this kind of tournament? What else will be good or what is bad?
Seems like an interesting, creative idea. I'm quite certainly glad not to be the one having to track it. <laughing>
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
The tournament, the first atleast, will be 1v1. It will be a big tournament (or small), no maximum number of players.
The idea is to let the players start and play they game they want to. Even against players outside of the tournament itself. All 1v1 games from the day the tournament starts count. In order to limit the possibilties to cheat it will be only allowed to play the same player once (of course you might play many times outside of the tournament but in the tournament the first game counts)
In order to limit the abillity to abuse the system it will only be allowed to play 5 games per map (and total of 10 games per "strange map")
The number of games will be optional. But a minumum of 50. The time to play the 50 games will be a month. All games within the month will count. (except the limitations)
The way we keep score is my own way to keep score.
I can explain in more detail later. But you calculate your score vs the opponents and thus can get a "break-even-score".
When your score-increes with 0.0 points. It will show your maximum score as a 1v1 player (if you play as good or as bad in the 50 or more games)
I will need the players to submit their games at every 10 games so we can keep track. I will look into the best players inorder to have no cheating. I will not have to look into all players.
What do you think of this kind of tournament? What else will be good or what is bad?
Seems like an interesting, creative idea. I'm quite certainly glad not to be the one having to track it. <laughing>
Well.. I was just bored everything is business as usuall here on CC....
But i thought it out and a vacation is better for me.. So. Chau!
