Moderator: Tournament Directors
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Not to be a nag, but this game was still missing on the scoreboard update. I just want to make sure Jobiwan and I don't miss out.YoursFalsey wrote:5190169 complete.
YoursFalsey won (3 eliminations) and Jobiwan came in second w/ 1 elimination.
Haha it's not nagging, you deserve your points! Anyway you're right, there are 53 points on the scoreboard and 57 should have been given out. I'll add them.YoursFalsey wrote:Not to be a nag, but this game was still missing on the scoreboard update. I just want to make sure Jobiwan and I don't miss out.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
NotNowKato wrote:my round 3 game has suddenly disappeared!? where has it gone?
Because the people I sent PM's out to a while ago still haven't joined. I guess they forfeit those games...OliverFA wrote:Also mine. What happened?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Two counterpoints to your theory- First, although the player in smaller games has fewer points to score, I would argue they have a better chance to get those points. There is still some bias towards the larger games. (3-player game, 2 pts, average score is 2/3 of a point vs. 8 player game, 7 pts, average score is 7/8 of a point. In any game, eliminating even one player is a better then average result, but from a probablistic viewpoint the expected score is better in a larger game.) Second, since it is random who is in which games, it is still fair as you are no more likely or less likely to get the large game advantage then any other player. (Think of the coin toss for an NFL game. Winning the coin toss is an "unfair" advantage, particularly for overtime, but the coin toss is still considered fair because it is random and both teams have the same chance of getting that unfair advantage.) At risk of sounding pedantic, your question shades into heavy philosophical territory, as it hinges upon what is fairness: equality of outcome (that everyone get the same tournament structure) or equality of opportunity (that no bias pre-exist so that everyone has the same chance for whatever happens.) This contest structure is designed for equality of opportunity w/ no claims of equality of otcopme...wolfpack0530 wrote:I have a quick question about the scoring system. I apologize if you answered it earlier in the thread.
Am I correct in assuming the following:?
-you get 1 point per termination
-in non terminator games, you still get a point for every player you eliminate.
Here is my question. Due to the randomness, there is a very uneven playing field. If I am randomly placed in three 8 player terminator games, i can get a possible 21 points. If I am placed in three 3 player terminator games, I can only score 6 points, and possibly be eliminated even if i win all three games.
Is this an intended side effect, since the players placed in larger games have more point opportunities? Or are you taking measures to try and make things as even as possible by making sure that all the players get a similar opportunity for points?
If my thinking is flawed, feel free to correct me
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"