Moderator: Community Team
You worded things differently..AAFitz wrote:Actually It depends what you mean by pointless...
If your point is to convince someone you are right, and they are wrong, then well, yes, it probably is pointless.
However, if you only wish to discuss the topic, present your side, and see some of the other views on the subject, and in the process incur a troll or two, than its not pointless at all.
Without a doubt, the diversity, however juvenile some of the posts may be, does add to the debate. Again, Its more of an entertainment, than a true learning experience, or opinion changing process, but its at least entertainment, where small bits of info are sometimes presented, that the other side just by reading, is forced to consider, however briefly.
So, no its not pointless at all, but I doubt its as useful as the OP usually hopes for.
player...fastposted me by a minute...
Real University has some nice discussions going on at times. Lately, it has gotten rather dead, mostly because the biggest issues have already been fairly hashed out... and because, ironically, the main forum has been relatively civil of late. It is starting to drop back down to where it was when Real U started, but the worst abusers have largely gone. (or maybe I am just more willing to take them on ...jsholty4690 wrote:I agree with you that most of the political threads normally turn into shouting matches between two or three people. There are only a handfull of people who do it and it gets annoying to those who want an intelligent discussion of the topics. I know I've stopped going into a lot of these threads because of what you pointed out in your post. It seems like people on both sides want to see how fast they can get the other to cave in by calling their other names. What are they four?
But like player said, there are some people that try to challenge other people's views. It seems like they want to learn how the other side really thinks about an issue, instead of listening to their normal means of getting news (i.e. CNN or Talk Radio). We just need more intelligent posters and find a way to marginalize those who just post to get into arguments with the other side.
Yeah, and how pointless are the threads we start about all of that?xelabale wrote:Admittedly most of the people intellectually creative enough to do this have been banned, but let's give it a go, eh?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
I don't want it split, I wanna see more inventiveness, interesting posts, wit and creativity. Am I on the wrong forum?thegreekdog wrote:Wasn't there some kind of topic about dividing up threads into different fora - i.e. one political forum, one sports forum, one other forum. I think that may be what you're looking for xela.
Yes. I think you want Flame Wars. Hopefully I won't get banned for typing that phrase.xelabale wrote:I don't want it split, I wanna see more inventiveness, interesting posts, wit and creativity. Am I on the wrong forum?thegreekdog wrote:Wasn't there some kind of topic about dividing up threads into different fora - i.e. one political forum, one sports forum, one other forum. I think that may be what you're looking for xela.
For that, you will need inventive, interesting, witty, creative people.xelabale wrote:I don't want it split, I wanna see more inventiveness, interesting posts, wit and creativity. Am I on the wrong forum?
Dude, please stop with posing as if you'll ever get banned. You're one of the favorites (to whom the rules don't apply)...thegreekdog wrote:Yes. I think you want Flame Wars. Hopefully I won't get banned for typing that phrase.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Shut up Stalin!!!jonesthecurl wrote:nothing persuasive is likely to be put forward here on the subject of healthcare, however.
Shut up Hitler!MrWainthrope wrote:Shut up Stalin!!!jonesthecurl wrote:nothing persuasive is likely to be put forward here on the subject of healthcare, however.
We must keep repeating Fox News and showing pointless Teabagging videos in hundreds of threads until everybody accepts that the free-market is the only way of providing healthcare in the whole world and that all of these stories about disgusting socialism working perfectly in other countries are filthy lies. Also: Obama = Satan.
Vote Palin 2012!!!
Ooooooo, MadLibs! My turn.thegreekdog wrote:Shut up Hitler!MrWainthrope wrote:Shut up Stalin!!!jonesthecurl wrote:nothing persuasive is likely to be put forward here on the subject of healthcare, however.
We must keep repeating Fox News and showing pointless Teabagging videos in hundreds of threads until everybody accepts that the free-market is the only way of providing healthcare in the whole world and that all of these stories about disgusting socialism working perfectly in other countries are filthy lies. Also: Obama = Satan.
Vote Palin 2012!!!
We must keep repeating MSNBC and showing Teabagging videos while making sexual references and calling you racists until everybody expects that anyone who disagrees with the president is racist and/or an igorant hick. The only way to provide anything to anyone is through government because government knows best. Also: Obama = God.
thegreekdog wrote:Yes. I think you want Flame Wars. Hopefully I won't get banned for typing that phrase.xelabale wrote:I don't want it split, I wanna see more inventiveness, interesting posts, wit and creativity. Am I on the wrong forum?thegreekdog wrote:Wasn't there some kind of topic about dividing up threads into different fora - i.e. one political forum, one sports forum, one other forum. I think that may be what you're looking for xela.
Perhaps, but I have learned a lot from links and posts here.jonesthecurl wrote:
I think we should agree for the moment that nothing new or persuasive is likely to be put forward here on the subject of healthcare, however.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
You seem to be implying that Flame Wars required abuse and foul language. Maybe you're right about abuse, but I never resorted to foul language in Flame Wars. Neither did xela as far as I know.PLAYER57832 wrote:As for Flame Wars.. .since when did creativity require abuse and foul language? Seems true creativity is learning to express yourself within bounds.
I only visited Flame wars once, when a thread I posted in was moved there. I speak only of the reputation and many of the complaints I have seen voiced about it since.thegreekdog wrote:You seem to be implying that Flame Wars required abuse and foul language. Maybe you're right about abuse, but I never resorted to foul language in Flame Wars. Neither did xela as far as I know.PLAYER57832 wrote:As for Flame Wars.. .since when did creativity require abuse and foul language? Seems true creativity is learning to express yourself within bounds.
f*ck off, that's way out of line. Dickhead.thegreekdog wrote:You seem to be implying that Flame Wars required abuse and foul language. Maybe you're right about abuse, but I never resorted to foul language in Flame Wars. Neither did xela as far as I know.PLAYER57832 wrote:As for Flame Wars.. .since when did creativity require abuse and foul language? Seems true creativity is learning to express yourself within bounds.
IN the interest of keeping humor ... humorous, I will abstain from participating.xelabale wrote: So it seems people are learning, that's something. Player said a couple of posts ago that this doesn't have to exclude humour or entertainment - let's make a pact of being incredibly hilarious whilst still subtly slagging the opposing point of view and even learning something in the process. Right, who's first?