Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
That's actually a pretty bad case from the info you've given. You'll have to give a context for that before I can seriously consider it.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and vote spiesr. In essence, it is because of his failure to put his unvote in bold on day 1 that got falko killed. If he had, we would have lynched cena instead. Now, I am not sure whether or not it was just an unfortunate mistake on spiesr's part or if he was specifically trying to look townie while still holding his vote on falko. All I know is that it caused a very useful townie to get killed and I don't necessarily trust him because of it.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Seriously? I'm sure i could go back and find a time when you forgot to bold aswell. And for your theory to work cena would also have to be scum.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and vote spiesr. In essence, it is because of his failure to put his unvote in bold on day 1 that got falko killed. If he had, we would have lynched cena instead. Now, I am not sure whether or not it was just an unfortunate mistake on spiesr's part or if he was specifically trying to look townie while still holding his vote on falko. All I know is that it caused a very useful townie to get killed and I don't necessarily trust him because of it.
Well, we don't know what cena is. I just find it extremely convenient how spiesr didn't bold his unvote and a townie was lynched. (suspiciously, cena was also on falko's bandwagon) I know it isn't a strong argument, but at the moment it is the best I got. If you have any better ideas, please post them.pmchugh wrote:Seriously? I'm sure i could go back and find a time when you forgot to bold aswell. And for your theory to work cena would also have to be scum.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and vote spiesr. In essence, it is because of his failure to put his unvote in bold on day 1 that got falko killed. If he had, we would have lynched cena instead. Now, I am not sure whether or not it was just an unfortunate mistake on spiesr's part or if he was specifically trying to look townie while still holding his vote on falko. All I know is that it caused a very useful townie to get killed and I don't necessarily trust him because of it.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
So the whole reason you attacked me was to look good yourself? All you care about is not appearing scummy, personally i dont give I say what i think period.captainwalrus wrote:Ok, I am beginning to think that I am really bad at mafia. I guess I need to think out who I target on night ones more.
I find spiser scummy, but I don't really think that the lynch of falko was really that scummy for the people involved. I think this because, a) I hammered, so I don't want to be seen as scummy, and b) it was day one and he was acting odd, there was confusion, it doesn't seem that unusual.
Oh f*ck, I totally forgot to follow up on his prod. Well, consider him out, and a replacement pending.pancakemix wrote:That's actually a pretty bad case from the info you've given. You'll have to give a context for that before I can seriously consider it.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and vote spiesr. In essence, it is because of his failure to put his unvote in bold on day 1 that got falko killed. If he had, we would have lynched cena instead. Now, I am not sure whether or not it was just an unfortunate mistake on spiesr's part or if he was specifically trying to look townie while still holding his vote on falko. All I know is that it caused a very useful townie to get killed and I don't necessarily trust him because of it.
Walrus, I'm waiting...
MOD, please prod/replace cena.
Cool, you're in. You're pm's coming momentarily.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:ok i'll replace
I didn't take it. CW did. Don't blame me because you looked suspicious yesterday.spiesr wrote:Well looking at thezz seems like a good place to start. I would vote him by a squirrel ate my vote...
This seems pretty solid. Although how are you cleared in all of this? Did you claim before and I just forgot about it? I can see how spiesr, CW and I are proven innocent by this, but not you. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.pmchugh wrote:Ok here is how i see it, 4 of us have a circle of claims which all backs itself up.
CW is a politician who tried to steal my vote but got speisrs, this show me and speisr were switched.
Squireel switched me and spiesr.
Speisr was unrecruitable and the scene sounds like it agrees with spiesr being the one attacked.
Strokem was likely to attack me since he knows me best and sinceI was switched with speisr then it all makes sense.
I don't see how any of this is refutable. i also see no reason for a scum busdriver to switch me and spiesr, and I doubt scum were given a polictician to start with. This proves that all of us are town or at worst 3rd party.
I wouldn't rule out pancake unless we can find proof of his innocence through night actions. I have found in my own play style that I "look for scum" more when I actually am scum. Just because he is actively posting doesn't necessarily mean he is helping us. However, I have yet to find anything against him, so I will agree with you for now.pmchugh wrote:This leaves:
LSU
sam
thez
pancake
Pancake seems to be highly active and looking for scum therefore at this moment i do not suspect him.
As i already said thez has been extremely scummy so that is where my vote is.
As for cena and sam, the three of us are in a mason group (counter terrorism unit) all three of us can back this up if needed. This only leaves 2 possible scum, pancake and thez.
unvote vote thez for emphisas.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Stroke tried to recruit me, so obviously I am not already mafia.squirrel wrote:This seems pretty solid. Although how are you cleared in all of this? Did you claim before and I just forgot about it? I can see how spiesr, CW and I are proven innocent by this, but not you. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
Oops. I guess that makes sense.pmchugh wrote:Stroke tried to recruit me, so obviously I am not already mafia.squirrel wrote:This seems pretty solid. Although how are you cleared in all of this? Did you claim before and I just forgot about it? I can see how spiesr, CW and I are proven innocent by this, but not you. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Stupid bold rule...Hologram wrote:Vote Count:
Thezzaruz (2) –sam_levi_11, pmchugh
pmchugh (1) – Thezzaruz
spiesr (3) – captainwalrus x2, Mr. Squirrel
captainwalrus (1) - pancakemix
WITH 8 ALIVE IT'S 5 TO LYNCH
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
For who? there are 3 people with 2 votes and that is it.spiesr wrote:So, claim time?