[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Being Multis Other: <Explanation> He failed to mention who he was. When i was playing a game with him earlier, he was from Iran, and now he is from America. Although account sitting is not against the rules, he did however forget to mention who was watching his account
Comments: I dont no how to do screen shots otherwise i would of. And on a further note, he plays private games with BlueButterfly who always wins. Enquiring minds do wonder.
Last edited by Darthvadar on Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You don't have to announce in game chat that someone is sitting the account. Although most do it out of courtesy. LOL at Bruce though. I highly doubt the 2 premiums would be multi's though more likely friends
lord voldemort wrote:You don't have to announce in game chat that someone is sitting the account. Although most do it out of courtesy. LOL at Bruce though. I highly doubt the 2 premiums would be multi's though more likely friends
lord voldemort wrote:You don't have to announce in game chat that someone is sitting the account. Although most do it out of courtesy. LOL at Bruce though. I highly doubt the 2 premiums would be multi's though more likely friends
I will take that bet These 2 are mutlis.
i mean with each other... just realised they signed up within 20 mins of eachother
Last edited by lord voldemort on Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
I believe you do have to state when an account is been sat. Otherwise it falls under the offense of "strategic babysitting" I do a hell of a lot of account sitting and always drop in game chat when I'm taking turns for someone. Moldy Mort the stench from your unchanged diapers has fried your brain kiddo.
BoganGod wrote:I believe you do have to state when an account is been sat. Otherwise it falls under the offense of "strategic babysitting" I do a hell of a lot of account sitting and always drop in game chat when I'm taking turns for someone. Moldy Mort the stench from your unchanged diapers has fried your brain kiddo.
im happy to be wrong...i suppose this will be fixed when they add account sitting as a feature
It never has been a rule to declare you're sitting someones account. The only rules having to do with account sitting, is the simple "No posting as them, no making games for them, no joining unless it's a tournament game, no sending PM's as them, etc". Simple stuff. Failing to announce has never been a rule. It's a polite curtsy, but not a requirement.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.
TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
I've noticed his flag change as well, to represent at least 4 different countries. When I asked him about this he responded on my wall with this : VPN by The Revenger on Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:44 pm
I'd also like to point out, that it is also not against the rules to send out your Account Password to more than one person that you trust, so that they don't get overwhelmed. I know that, when I have above 100 games, and I need a quick account sitter, I know both someone in New York, someone in the UK, and someone from Serbia that I can all trust to divide it up amongst themselves, and as such, throw a quick PM to them all.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.
TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
I always try to announce that I am account sitting...but sometimes, especially if you are play 100 games for somebody, it gets a bit tedious. I don't think it is against the rules not to announce, but as a courtesy, you should if you can.
lord voldemort wrote:You don't have to announce in game chat that someone is sitting the account. Although most do it out of courtesy. LOL at Bruce though. I highly doubt the 2 premiums would be multi's though more likely friends
I will take that bet These 2 are mutlis.
i mean with each other... just realised they signed up within 20 mins of eachother
Indeed they are friends but they are 2 players who got banned for point dumping now back as multis
If you wish to accuse them of Multi-accounting, you should make your own thread.
Other: <Explanation> He failed to mention who he was. When i was playing a game with him earlier, he was from Iran, and now he is from America. Although account sitting is not against the rules, he did however forget to mention who was watching his account
That is what this is about. Discussing past point dumping of players that may or may not be multi's is not on topic.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.
TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
Kotaro wrote:If you wish to accuse them of Multi-accounting, you should make your own thread.
Other: <Explanation> He failed to mention who he was. When i was playing a game with him earlier, he was from Iran, and now he is from America. Although account sitting is not against the rules, he did however forget to mention who was watching his account
That is what this is about. Discussing past point dumping of players that may or may not be multi's is not on topic.
You fail to realize this is why the flag's have changed many times over. Thus the account sitting. These 2 friends who are also multis which have been turned in( As far as I know) are sitting for each other. Or at the very least into each other's accounts. Not announcing it and thus we are lead to this point. All is related.
The reason their flags changed was because they are friends and account sitting. And they haven't announced it. Period. Clear cut case of, it's not polite, but there's no rule against it.
Past transgressions have no impact on the fact that they have Account sat for each other. They could be avid-trolls/flamers, or could be PM abusers as well. None of that impacts the fact that this C&A report is about their account sitting and not announcing it, which is not against the rules
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.
TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
Kotaro wrote:I don't quite see it that way. I see it as;
The reason their flags changed was because they are friends and account sitting. And they haven't announced it. Period. Clear cut case of, it's not polite, but there's no rule against it.
Past transgressions have no impact on the fact that they have Account sat for each other. They could be avid-trolls/flamers, or could be PM abusers as well. None of that impacts the fact that this C&A report is about their account sitting and not announcing it, which is not against the rules
If their flag(s) were from say the USA and UK I would agree with you. It would not be so easy to spot, but since it shows Iran as the flag it is pretty easy to spot. How many players are from Iran? Answer very very few. Just so happens these Leyla and Night2 are banned and about 3 days later 2 new players from that country come to CC? I think not. It is pretty easy to spot what happened here.
That's great and all, and I'm sure that KA will look into it, but again, this is not a multiple accounts complaint thread, this is an account sitter complaint thread. To complain about them being multi's, you really should make your own thread, not drag this one into it, as that isn't the topic set here.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.
TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
BoganGod wrote:I believe you do have to state when an account is been sat. Otherwise it falls under the offense of "strategic babysitting" I do a hell of a lot of account sitting and always drop in game chat when I'm taking turns for someone. Moldy Mort the stench from your unchanged diapers has fried your brain kiddo.
im happy to be wrong...i suppose this will be fixed when they add account sitting as a feature
I think you must be very happy been wrong. You seem to like been happy..........
Kotaro wrote:That's great and all, and I'm sure that KA will look into it, but again, this is not a multiple accounts complaint thread, this is an account sitter complaint thread. To complain about them being multi's, you really should make your own thread, not drag this one into it, as that isn't the topic set here.
Still missing the point and missed where I said, the multi end of it has been reported as far as I know, since I did not make the report. Anyhow This will be noted, more than likely and move on.
Kotaro wrote:That's great and all, and I'm sure that KA will look into it, but again, this is not a multiple accounts complaint thread, this is an account sitter complaint thread. To complain about them being multi's, you really should make your own thread, not drag this one into it, as that isn't the topic set here.
These 2 are mutlis.
by The Revenger on Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:44 pm
