It must've been the first night, in the second one puff was deadchessplaya wrote:but geegle r u sure that he voted puff before it was night and he had to investigate him?
Moderator: Community Team
Check your pm's again and see if they're there.CBlake wrote:i voted for puff before i investigated him wait it was either puff or fircoal i investigated , just believe me on this one i am the cop and everywhere116 is the mafia
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an innocent person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as innocent and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?Fircoal wrote:Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.geegel wrote:Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116
Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.
Vote: CBlake
geegel wrote:Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?Fircoal wrote:Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.geegel wrote:Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116
Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.
Vote: CBlake
Don't blame me, blame MBMachiavelli wrote:geegel wrote:Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?Fircoal wrote:Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.geegel wrote:Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116
Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.
Vote: CBlake
Mafia trying to confuse town^^^
So CBlake is that what happened?geegel wrote:Puff would have shown up as scum and thus his vote. An insane cop sees an innocent person guilty and the other way around. Everywhere116 proly showed up as innocent and thus must be guilty. Twisted eh?Fircoal wrote:Then puff would of been SCUM! He can't be an insane cop, unless MB messed up.geegel wrote:Stop right there and unvote. He might be an insane cop.Fircoal wrote:unvote: Everywhere116
Odd, no wonder he had to go, he doesn't want to explain the truth.
Vote: CBlake
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Machiavelli wrote:He can tell us what they say though.geegel wrote:He's not allowed to quote from them. Game rules.Machiavelli wrote:Dont you still have the pm's of your investigations?
Trying to surpress information?
geegel wrote:CBlake wrote:
i voted for puff before i investigated him wait it was either puff or fircoal i investigated , just believe me on this one i am the cop and everywhere116 is the mafia
Crap, I missed this one. Who DID you investigate?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Nothing, and just feel like I'm going to throw up, and usually I don't when I'm on roller coasters.geegel wrote:Just vote everywhere116 mate.Fircoal wrote:Fos: Geegel, CBlake, Everywhere116, chessplaya, and anyone else who is acting scummy that I can't remember
I WANT OFF THE ROLLER COASTER!
Like I do:
vote everywhere116
P.S.:
What's wrong with rollercoasters?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:
1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.
I don't think Houssam is scum, and if you look at the pm you can tell there is no Sk, right Mach.Machiavelli wrote:Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:
1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.
PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.Fircoal wrote:I don't think Houssam is scum, and if you look at the pm you can tell there is no Sk, right Mach.Machiavelli wrote:Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:
1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.
PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.
I'm 80-100% sure that Houssam is not scum. And who else has been in games where you explained that. I have.Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.Fircoal wrote:I don't think Houssam is scum, and if you look at the pm you can tell there is no Sk, right Mach.Machiavelli wrote:Houssam is scum, remember this in the back of your head, noone act on this now.HoussamTheGreat wrote:First, the no kill tonight I think gives us 2 very important pieces of info:
1. There is no serial killer - and if there is a vig he decided not to shoot randomly. both pieces of extremely good news.
PS This post was meant for me, when I do a reread.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.
I have no idea, who are these tricky scum?HoussamTheGreat wrote:Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.
Now.. what the hell do we do??
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
And I have explained that the game does not just end when all the mafia are de@d if it did ...HoussamTheGreat wrote:Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.
Now.. what the hell do we do??
BUT WE DON'T HAVE AN SKMachiavelli wrote:And I have explained that the game does not just end when all the mafia are de@d if it did ...HoussamTheGreat wrote:Dude, and I have explained then that the mod can make whatever rule he wants. If he decides that town wins by eliminating mafia but not the serial killer - that's his choice. We had a double kill to explain, remember?Machiavelli wrote:Yes, and Houssam should know that because he's been in games where I have explained that.
Now.. what the hell do we do??
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.