[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Comments: PLEASE READ GAME LOG AND TELL ME IF THIS DOESN'T SUCK!!!!
Fixed the link to the game.
But I couldn't complete the other fields above because, frankly, I don't know what your problem is. So they're both vocal and can't spell. Big deal. If you don't like them, foe them and move on.
Comments: PLEASE READ GAME LOG AND TELL ME IF THIS DOESN'T SUCK!!!!
Fixed the link to the game.
But I couldn't complete the other fields above because, frankly, I don't know what your problem is. So they're both vocal and can't spell. Big deal. If you don't like them, foe them and move on.
I think he's talking about the fact that they ganged up to beat him. Unfortunately that's usually what happens in a 3-player game, especially flat rate. I was actually surprised that Brann didn't suicide.
72o wrote:
I think he's talking about the fact that they ganged up to beat him. Unfortunately that's usually what happens in a 3-player game, especially flat rate. I was actually surprised that Brann didn't suicide.
I didn't see it that way. I play 3-player games a lot (almost exclusively). When one player is dominating, it's perfectly normal (and logical) for the other two to try to weaken them to give themselves a shot - it's just self-preservation. If that's the complaint about this game, then I think it's still not an issue. No evidence or suggestion of secret diplomacy, and all the gripes about green probably going to win are in the chat ... just a normal game from that point of view.
72o wrote:
I think he's talking about the fact that they ganged up to beat him. Unfortunately that's usually what happens in a 3-player game, especially flat rate. I was actually surprised that Brann didn't suicide.
I didn't see it that way. I play 3-player games a lot (almost exclusively). When one player is dominating, it's perfectly normal (and logical) for the other two to try to weaken them to give themselves a shot - it's just self-preservation. If that's the complaint about this game, then I think it's still not an issue. No evidence or suggestion of secret diplomacy, and all the gripes about green probably going to win are in the chat ... just a normal game from that point of view.
Maybe I was misunderstood. I agree, this is normal 3-player play. From the chat it sounded like green had all of NA and most of Asia before they teamed up. Teaming up is part of survival at that point.
The comment on Brann suiciding is because I've seen him do it before several times when someone makes a bonehead play. Perhaps he has changed his ways, or is more inclined to keep his points now that he's ranked up.
Comments: PLEASE READ GAME LOG AND TELL ME IF THIS DOESN'T SUCK!!!!
Ricky if you can't even give us a game number and who you are accusing you shouldn't expect other players to do it for you. It's nice that delahoc found a game but we don't know for sue if that is the game you are talking about.
Please fill out the form. You can't expect us to put in the time to help if you won't put in the time to fill out the form.
Comments: PLEASE READ GAME LOG AND TELL ME IF THIS DOESN'T SUCK!!!!
Ricky if you can't even give us a game number and who you are accusing you shouldn't expect other players to do it for you. It's nice that delahoc found a game but we don't know for sue if that is the game you are talking about.
Please fill out the form. You can't expect us to put in the time to help if you won't put in the time to fill out the form.
While I agree that people too lazy to fill out the form shouldn't fill out C&A reports, the game number is the title of the thread.
Yes, the game number is in the title of the thread, and that's where I got it from. But I agree that it's very poor form to expect people to address an issue for you when you can't even be bothered reporting the issue properly. That's why I initially thought that his problem was in the language used in the chat, whereas 72o thought the issue was with the other players ganging up on him. So an improperly completed form meant no one knew who was being accused of what.
Perhaps this thread should just be closed and ignored now, due to incomplete information being supplied by the complainant.
72o wrote:
While I agree that people too lazy to fill out the form shouldn't fill out C&A reports, the game number is the title of the thread.
Bottom line is without proper information like what this user is accusing someone of doing in this game, who he is accusing or why he is accusing them of doing that then we very well cant do our job effectively.
If users who want other users to be looked at under the microscope for a violation of the rules want it to be done and done correctly then we need these small things to be in the report or followed up in the thread by the accuser in a some what timely manner.
delahoc wrote:Perhaps this thread should just be closed and ignored now, due to incomplete information being supplied by the complainant.
It will be closed if this information that I listed above is not filled in by the accuser tomorrow.
Comments: PLEASE READ GAME LOG AND TELL ME IF THIS DOESN'T SUCK!!!!
Ricky if you can't even give us a game number and who you are accusing you shouldn't expect other players to do it for you. It's nice that delahoc found a game but we don't know for sue if that is the game you are talking about.
Please fill out the form. You can't expect us to put in the time to help if you won't put in the time to fill out the form.
While I agree that people too lazy to fill out the form shouldn't fill out C&A reports, the game number is the title of the thread.
