1. skoffin needs to say something
2. safari being scum mason? he would prob play it a bit different if he was. Telling us he was mason and who was investigated doesnt sound too scummy to me. just my thoughts
3. where did wercool go?
4. my vote has been stolen today...so whoever has it dont do anything too stupid
okay so safariguy skoffin was investigated and you don't know the result so why are you and everyone else voting for skoffin. we don't know what the investigation turned up. seems weird to me
gregwolf121 wrote:okay so safariguy skoffin was investigated and you don't know the result so why are you and everyone else voting for skoffin. we don't know what the investigation turned up. seems weird to me
That's true, but that's all I have to go by right now. Forcing a claim is preferable to nothing imho.
still same place we were before, cant do much without hearing from skoff
Same questions being raised about safari being poss scum.
safariguy5 wrote:
gregwolf121 wrote:with the mason partner thing the majority of the times ive seen it used one mason partner was town the other was scum,
so im not to sure about wat to do in this situation
I've played a game with 3 masons, and they were all town, so I don't know about one being anti-town. Colton did tell us each other's alignments, so I knew he was the cop before we even ended the night.
Seems like a pretty weak reason to support mason being town. I'm not saying safari is one or the other. Just that we cant use that for establishing either way.
We really have nothing to go on w/o skoff posting, so like I said, cant do much.
You have 5 days to reach a lynch. If the dedline is reached the player with the highest number of votes is lynched.
I protest (again). The inactivity of one person (Skoffin) is stifling all other activity. Rather than imposing a deadline, said person should be replaced.
You have 5 days to reach a lynch. If the dedline is reached the player with the highest number of votes is lynched.
I protest (again). The inactivity of one person (Skoffin) is stifling all other activity. Rather than imposing a deadline, said person should be replaced.
Sorry but agreed, skoffin is obvi awol. Ban them from future games and lets get replacement.
You have 5 days to reach a lynch. If the dedline is reached the player with the highest number of votes is lynched.
I protest (again). The inactivity of one person (Skoffin) is stifling all other activity. Rather than imposing a deadline, said person should be replaced.
You have 5 days to reach a lynch. If the dedline is reached the player with the highest number of votes is lynched.
I protest (again). The inactivity of one person (Skoffin) is stifling all other activity. Rather than imposing a deadline, said person should be replaced.
Sorry but agreed, skoffin is obvi awol. Ban them from future games and lets get replacement.
No, I know Skoffin, she's good. When she's active.
