Moderator: Community Team
EBWOPcaptainwalrus wrote:I agree, but wer is also a noob, so I don't want to lynch too fast. He acts scummy, but so does safari. A mason is an easy claim IMO, and can't be backed up if the other person is dead. Also, if skoffin is indeed a PGO, why vote for him? PGOs are almost always town (unless it is a fircoal game).
/ was a mason/cop. That means someone else is a mason. Safari claimed, no one countered. That pretty much means that Safari is the mason, but what else is he besides a mason.captainwalrus wrote:EBWOPcaptainwalrus wrote:I agree, but wer is also a noob, so I don't want to lynch too fast. He acts scummy, but so does safari. A mason is an easy claim IMO, and can't be backed up if the other person is dead. Also, if skoffin is indeed a PGO, why vote for him? PGOs are almost always town (unless it is a fircoal game).

If that's the case, I'm willing to take a vote for you to prove a point.safariguy5 wrote:Alright fine, I'll claim (without any pressure by votes mind you). I'm the politician (vote stealer). I stole DCR's vote day 1 because colton pm'ed me and said I had this special perk. I stole cowboyz vote night 1. I know some people think this to be scummy, but I can back this up by placing the stolen vote on anyone.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Well, unless the scum are making a counter-intuitive effort to clear you, that's evidence enough for me that you are who you say you are. You could still be scum, but I don't think that's likely.colton24 wrote:Vote Count
Skoffin(4)-safariguy5,DCR,wercool,???
PCM(1)-cowboyz
Not Voting:gregwolf121,captainwalrus,Rainbow Eater,Skoffin
With 9 Alive It Takes 6 To Lynch
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.

This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
He asked me to prove claim and I did. You look scummy for trying to prevent a lynch. FOS Rainbow EaterRainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake

Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
How is it fake if he was the role he claimed to be?Rainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake
safariguy5 wrote:He asked me to prove claim and I did. You look scummy for trying to prevent a lynch. FOS Rainbow EaterRainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake
The interaction seems fake.captainwalrus wrote:How is it fake if he was the role he claimed to be?Rainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake
If you asked me, I'd say no, wait for Skoffin to be replaced. At least then we can get something. Now it probably looks like I'm covering my tracks to you, but that vote was pretty quick I do say so. Your argument is relatively weak on the whole. I said it doesn't clear him, but that's unlikely. And why do I get the vote?Rainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Agreed, seems fishypancakemix wrote:If you asked me, I'd say no, wait for Skoffin to be replaced. At least then we can get something. Now it probably looks like I'm covering my tracks to you, but that vote was pretty quick I do say so. Your argument is relatively weak on the whole. I said it doesn't clear him, but that's unlikely. And why do I get the vote?Rainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake
Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:He asked me to prove claim and I did. You look scummy for trying to prevent a lynch. FOS Rainbow EaterRainbow Eater wrote:This seems really scummy. I think that you and pancake have something cooked up. That whole interaction between you two seems really fake.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.
unvote vote pancake
1) only thing that was proven was that a vote was moved. does not mean that you are not scum.
2) you are trying to lynch a PGO, which is a waste. This has been said by more than just me yet you don't really understand what that is. This is usually a town role and wanting to lynch a town role is a scummy move.
3) you are wanting to lynch an inactive with out getting someone in here to who might shed some light on this situation. This is a scummy move.
4) you FOS me which is weak, if you really felt strong about me, stand behind your statements and place a vote. This seems to be another scummy move.
And yea, seems kinda strange trying to put skoff at L-1, especially since we are working on finding a replacement.safariguy5 wrote:Well, should we lynch the inactive? I can switch the stolen vote to put skoffin at L-1. I dunno who else would be a good target.


Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
safariguy5 wrote:Fine by me, you want action?
unvote, vote Rainbow Eater
No, I just keep proving I'm the politician. You weren't convinced my roleclaim was genuine. This double vote of both me and the stolen vote should prove that yes, I am the politician. There was no OMGUS.Rainbow Eater wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Fine by me, you want action?
unvote, vote Rainbow Eater
Nice OMGUS vote.
you just keep proving my point.

Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed