Moderator: Community Team
How romantic! It's just like your polls. Could it be you have finally found a soulmate? You could run through green meadows with sounds of music playing in the background, go for long walks holding hands and watch the sunset on a beach. I'm so happy for both of you, can I come to your civil union after which you will have slightly less legal benefits than a regularly married couple?Phatscotty wrote:gotta love the ever so passive "why not" for yes
gotta love the ever so definitive "absolutely not" for no
gotta love the ever so insulting option for medium ground
define troll more clearly? impossible
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallelism_%28grammar%29Phatscotty wrote:gotta love the ever so passive "why not" for yes
gotta love the ever so definitive "absolutely not" for no
i know, my "yes, no, maybes" are way too biased for mostMeDeFe wrote:How romantic! It's just like your polls. Could it be you have finally found a soulmate? You could run through green meadows with sounds of music playing in the background, go for long walks holding hands and watch the sunset on a beach. I'm so happy for both of you, can I come to your civil union after which you will have slightly less legal benefits than a regularly married couple?Phatscotty wrote:gotta love the ever so passive "why not" for yes
gotta love the ever so definitive "absolutely not" for no
gotta love the ever so insulting option for medium ground
define troll more clearly? impossible
WOW. This REALLY sounds like an argument against letting blacks and whites marry, not homosexuals.multilis wrote:so how do you feel about people getting ape married? (Or monkey married, since this is a monkey business thread?)
Perhaps they can genetically engineer the monkeys to be closer to humans.
It is natural, as animals in nature have been observed trying to have sex with other animals, eg rabbit trying to breed hens or sow or cow in heat trying to breed with a farmer.

oh then we're on the same page, because i'm not sure how gay marriage is related to marrying an animalmultilis wrote:"WOW. This REALLY sounds like an argument against letting blacks and whites marry, not homosexuals."
How? (My white brother married a black woman, my sister someone from Philippines, not sure how at all related to marrying an animal)
IMO he is reffering to the homo-sexuals argument, that no group, no matter how small, can be denied their civil rights, to force a religious institution to perform a marriage ceremony. The Animal boinkers are next in line. Just saying, don't look behind you unless you are into goat play.multilis wrote:"oh then we're on the same page, because i'm not sure how gay marriage is related to marrying an animal"
Both types of sex happen in nature, may be part of genetics as far as preference goes, and in both cases babies aren't made.
Is your brothers marriage ' normal ' , many would have considered it not so a few decades back.multilis wrote:"WOW. This REALLY sounds like an argument against letting blacks and whites marry, not homosexuals."
How? (My white brother married a black woman, my sister someone from Philippines, not sure how at all related to marrying an animal.)
20 years from now you may be a "conservative" if you don't accept people marrying monkeys as normal marriage.
that's nicemultilis wrote:"oh then we're on the same page, because i'm not sure how gay marriage is related to marrying an animal"
Both types of sex happen in nature, may be part of genetics as far as preference goes, and in both cases babies aren't made. (One view of marriage is related to procreation of next generation)
The same sort of logic can be used to label both as either "normal" or "abnormal".
With the increasing power of "gene splicing", monkey marriage may become much more common in 20 years.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
To be honest, "Why Not?" wouldn't be my choice. It's "OF COURSE!"MeDeFe wrote:How romantic! It's just like your polls. Could it be you have finally found a soulmate? You could run through green meadows with sounds of music playing in the background, go for long walks holding hands and watch the sunset on a beach. I'm so happy for both of you, can I come to your civil union after which you will have slightly less legal benefits than a regularly married couple?Phatscotty wrote:gotta love the ever so passive "why not" for yes
gotta love the ever so definitive "absolutely not" for no
gotta love the ever so insulting option for medium ground
define troll more clearly? impossible
Man, your brother is betraying his race by marrying a black woman. It might be "natural" (i.e. real people have sex with black women all the time) but that doesn't excuse it. He's marrying an animal, unlike those fine, strapping white lads who marry other fine, muscular white lads.multilis wrote:"WOW. This REALLY sounds like an argument against letting blacks and whites marry, not homosexuals."
How? (My white brother married a black woman, my sister someone from Philippines, not sure how at all related to marrying an animal.)
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Well there's plenty of racists out there that view coloured people are somehow inhuman, animals. Monkey is often a used as a derogatory term for black people. So...multilis wrote:How? (My white brother married a black woman, my sister someone from Philippines, not sure how at all related to marrying an animal.)
Sounds a lot like an argument against black and white people getting married. "Oi! What are yer doin' gettin' married to 'dat monkey?! No daughter o' mine gonna marry no negro!" Quite simply, bestiality has no place in a discussion about homosexuality (unless it's homosexual bestiality). Homosexuality is between two consenting adults, not an adult fucking an animal that cannot consent to sex. Offspring is completely irrelevant. By that argument, you should pass laws that those who get married MUST have children (and, by such extension, sterile people and old people cannot get married).multilis wrote:so how do you feel about people getting ape married? (Or monkey married, since this is a monkey business thread?)

thanks for the update broheimFalkomagno wrote:I don't like gay marriage.