spiesr wrote:So colton, I know there really isn't much of a case against you, but would you like to offer a compelling defense or maybe some sort of claim?
Ok, another idea: we could vote duality out.. hes busted anyway, and before we wait 2 more months for a replacement, we could just lynch him for being a multy.
lhcguy wrote:Ok, another idea: we could vote duality out.. hes busted anyway, and before we wait 2 more months for a replacement, we could just lynch him for being a multy.
spiesr wrote:So colton, I know there really isn't much of a case against you, but would you like to offer a compelling defense or maybe some sort of claim?
I'm a peasant.
thats a weak claim and with you being so much more defencive then usual im going to unvote vote colton
The king reigns... and his son. Jesus is the prince!!! i never have and probably never will use a plug in/ add-on.
lhcguy wrote:Ok, another idea: we could vote duality out.. hes busted anyway, and before we wait 2 more months for a replacement, we could just lynch him for being a multy.
Voting out a non player isn't likely going to get us really get us anywhere as there is highly limited information that we can glean from such a lynch. Additionally, there are those who would consider advocating such an action to be scum tactic as if the scum can keep attention on the inactives during day it
spiesr wrote:Additionally, there are those who would consider advocating such an action to be scum tactic as if the scum can keep attention on the inactives during day it
Inactive is quite different from banned. Duality is not coming back, and finding a replacement may take longer than it's worth. If you want to convince me to vote for someone else, I'm all ears. Since I have nothing to go on, this is as good of a reason as any.
lhcguy wrote:Ok, another idea: we could vote duality out.. hes busted anyway, and before we wait 2 more months for a replacement, we could just lynch him for being a multy.
Voting out a non player isn't likely going to get us really get us anywhere as there is highly limited information that we can glean from such a lynch. Additionally, there are those who would consider advocating such an action to be scum tactic as if the scum can keep attention on the inactives during day it
That's true, but we have no information anyways due to it being day 1 and no night 0. I'd rather get rid of an inactive than colton, because frankly, that tells us even less. With all due respect colton, you play the same no matter what you are. And in a word, your play style is pretty scummy. Hence all the early pressure. Seriously dude, you need to chill out if you get voted. And a vanilla townie claim doesn't help your cause either. I'm all for killing the inactive over the same old kill colton day 1 schtick. That is, unless a replacement is found relatively quickly.