Moderator: Cartographers
C'mon, you had to know that if you said you weren't going to use it, someone would say they like it and want you to use it. That was just reverse psychology, right?natty_dread wrote:Really? Hmm.. perhaps I'll consider it then.
Eh... actually I was expecting to get people saying that the texture is too weird... I was just anticipating for that. But hey, if it works it works...ender516 wrote:C'mon, you had to know that if you said you weren't going to use it, someone would say they like it and want you to use it. That was just reverse psychology, right?natty_dread wrote:Really? Hmm.. perhaps I'll consider it then.
Yikes, the colour issue again... The colours may well be changed when the map goes to graphics shop but they'll serve their purpose now.zimmah wrote:i really don't like the colors on it

Hi, and thanks for your feedback.cowfoot wrote:Hi
Just a small remark, from a person coming from the region.
The island south of Sweden where im coming from is called Bornholm its a part of Denmark, but when it is so far from the rest of the country it would be nice if it had its own region.
otherwise nice work, im looking forward to playing the map


Thanks! I was waiting for you...Eyestone wrote:I'm back!
Map looks much better with regions. I like it. It's not geographically correct as you know, but it's just about how good it can get.
Yeah... The Bodø issue... I figured you'd say something about this. Thing is I need a 4th region for Northern Norway. Without, the mountains are kinda pointless...Just a few small things:
- I think it looks weird with all the regions and suddenly the city Bodø pops out as a large area. I suggest you put those 2 regions together and called them Nordland, and instead use the group of islands as a region of it's own and name it Lofoten. It makes more sense.
Will do! (Must have missed that one... the ø:s in the font were so crappy I had to make my own, but I guess I didn't get them all)- Trondelag should be named Trøndelag.
You would be, I know- The Swedish issue about Götalanden. Why not just call it Götaland as it was proposed. That's even a name I've heard before. I think it's illogical to find up an ending on your own. I would be pissed if you'd call Trøndelag 'Trøndelagene' for example.
Thanks! Always nice to hear of you, you always give me stuff to work withGood luck with the rest of the work!
Yes, I know. However I'm planning on saving that for graphics shop, since it's lots of work on graphics only... Mountains are the hardest part of a map usually. So remind me again after we get gameplay in checkcaptainwalrus wrote:The mountains need some serious work...


I'll be trying some new textures in the next update.Industrial Helix wrote:I'd say its looking reasonably good and has taken massive steps towards improvement recently, but a few problem stand out:
1) I really do not like the texture... it kind of reminds me of the pattern on my ceiling. I'd suggest seeing how it looks without texture as the glow from the countries might be enough already. Or try, perhaps, some grainier paper as an under layer.
I'll try, but I don't want to change the borders too much. They're fairly accurate as they are now.2) I think you're going to have to redress your borders some so that more names fit in the territories.
Yes, I'll be redoing the mountains. By the way, do you think the map could use more impassables? I could put another set of mountains in southern norway. Rivers & lakes could be used for sweden and finland...3)Hmm... mountains are impassable. I didn't realize there were mountains until I read about them. Make them stand out a little more.
I quite like the current font, and others have also expressed that they like it. It's easy to read while fitting in with the visual style of the map. Also the dual colour serves as differentiating the countries, especially in places where it's harder to say which country a territory belongs to (see Åland). So unless I'll get more complaints about the font, I'm a bit reluctant to do anything to it...4) I'd suggest using some different fonts and experimenting. In having a duel color font I think you might be cramming too much into too small of a space.

If that happens, it happens. But I'd really like to concentrate on the gameplay aspect for now, the graphics should be good enough to serve their purpose until this gets to the graphics shop.Industrial Helix wrote:As you like I suppose. It's not going to get through the graphics workshop without altering some of the borders, I had the same problems with my maps.
Yes, we have lots of lakes... Finland is actually known as "the land of the 1000 lakes"...As for adding lakes, ect. I think it might be a decent idea and worth going for. Finland has a lot of lakes, from what I recall. Can't say about Sweden or Norway. And I think southern mountains might be a decent idea as well.


Good, but can you move them to follow the border with norland more? Right now it looks like you can go around the mountains and attack Norland from Jamtland and possibly Lofoten. Like how you have the ones between Hordaland and Oppland!natty_dread wrote:Well, I couldn't decide where to put impassables in finland... Any suggestions? Which would be best spots, gameplay-wise? No worries if there's no real lakes or rivers there, I can just plant a forest there or something...
Anyway, new mountains: how do these look?


That's odd... to me it seems clear. Where does it look like you can go around?isaiah40 wrote:Can you put those mountains over the border? It still looks like you can go around the mountains.

Lol, I wasn't sure if that was the slogan of Finland or the state of Minnesota. I think Minnesota is 10,000 Lakes or something.natty_dread wrote:
Yes, we have lots of lakes... Finland is actually known as "the land of the 1000 lakes"...![]()
Lol... take a look at this and you'll understand my predicament:Industrial Helix wrote:natty_dread wrote: No idea where to put them though. Wherever they are geographically, I guess.

