Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
I cleaned it up and made it severe ratings abuse since this guy seems to have bad ratings for everyoneD-Apocalypse wrote:
Accused: MUIHIASL
Other: Severe Ratings Abuse
Game number(s):
Game 6243207
Comments: This game was won in 10 rounds, i don't appreciate the feedback that was left on my record and ask that it is changed to reflect the game played and or removed totally
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
hahahahha, they won't change it or remove it.D-Apocalypse wrote:MUIHIASL
Stars for FAIR PLAY: 0 GAME PLAY: 1 ATTITUDE: 0
"Slow, Backstabber, Coward, Clueless"
This game was won in 10 rounds, i don't appreciate the feedback that was left on my record and ask that it is changed to reflect the game played and or removed totally
Accused: MUIHIASL
Other: unfair, retaliation feedback
Game number(s): 6243207

i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.alex951 wrote:i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
Its probably pretty hard to get an overall rating of 4.0 or lower simply because you are beating players and they are retaliating with low rating stars. There are far fewer players who give undeserved low ratings compared to players who are receiving ratings because of some negative behavior.alex951 wrote:i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
and more to the point, if a random player gave you an inappropriate rating, that wouldn't affect your overall rating to any great extent. and as far as i've seen, players who have low ratings deserve them, meaning they consistently receive justifiably low ratings, not the unjustified 1 star across the board rating that we've all recieved from time to time.alex951 wrote:i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
I personally have a 4.3 threshold. And the reason is that they are more likely to suicide, deadbeat, team kill, ect. so that even playing one game with them is unpleasant.rhp 1 wrote:lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.alex951 wrote:i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.

thats my point Snow, if their rating is under 4.3 then they receive consistent justifiably poor ratings, not 1 star across the board by a random person now and then (which seems to be what this is all aboutSnowgun wrote:I personally have a 4.3 threshold. And the reason is that they are more likely to suicide, deadbeat, team kill, ect. so that even playing one game with them is unpleasant.rhp 1 wrote:lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.alex951 wrote:i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.
So you are saying 3 is a poor rating?rhp 1 wrote:thats my point Snow, if their rating is under 4.3 then they receive consistent justifiably poor ratings, not 1 star across the board by a random person now and then (which seems to be what this is all aboutSnowgun wrote:I personally have a 4.3 threshold. And the reason is that they are more likely to suicide, deadbeat, team kill, ect. so that even playing one game with them is unpleasant.rhp 1 wrote:lmao... well, i don't see a lot of 3's on peoples' ratings, and i understand why you wouldn't... but seriously? just smoke em, foe em if you don't like their play, and move on.alex951 wrote:i wouldn't join a game if a player has a 4.0 or lowerrhp 1 wrote:i wish everyone would get over ratings... who cares. you see a game you like... you join. how many people check the ratings of the people who are already in a game, not to mention the players who join after. do you check each person's ratings as they join and drop the game if you don't like what you see?? lol. lighten up. beside's you foed the person and don't have to worry about. and you wrote a response, so anyone as sensitive as you about ratings will see your response and understand what the deal is.)
damn straight chief! my point was just that random poor ratings by vindictive players have a small impact on someone's overall ratings. and you can respond to them if you wish, and the person looking at them can check the game and make up their own minds.... this is gettin funny. just ban the dude and revoke his premium status, and then hit him in the head like a baby seal. lmaobigg chief wrote:don't believe the hype , rhp1 gave me a terrible ratingand than made fun of me and yelled bad words at me![]()
, Who cares about ratings , thats what he told me and I believe him , because he's my buddy and buddies don't lie to one another .... right rhp1.
![]()
![]()

Snow... you're a 100% right... if someone gives ones to everyone with no cause, something should be done. i guess my point was a lot of people are a little too sensitive about ratings and such, but in this case... it's a little much. lolSnowgun wrote:There is currently another rating report on this guy.
I hear what RHP 1 is saying. If someone throws a 1's rating at someone, get over it. It happened, it's not gonna affect your score, and it was just a rare bad deal.
HOWEVER, this guy throws 1's at everyone, and thats a problem. This is different than someone giving 1's to someone, even if it was retaliatory, every once in a while (but rarely).