Moderator: Community Team
And I changed my mind and voted Celfish_lad wrote: Hell. Might even get him another ban.
Elf should have given us 2 options, then it would be B & CGypsys Kiss wrote:I was going to vote for B until this little bit....
And I changed my mind and voted Celfish_lad wrote: Hell. Might even get him another ban.
Both of these are great ideas.elfish_lad wrote:Maybe Herpes will write an article?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Articles are posted on the Newsletter staff forum, where a) the staff get to comment on the articles and b) the leader of each Newsletter section reviews the articles and if he notices any inappropriateness they won't get published.Wait a sec! Don't all articles go thru samuelc812 first? IF there is some inappropriate stuff, won't sam delete it?
now that WOULD be good. go get a tampon, elf. sorry.natty_dread wrote:I voted "hell no" on this one.
However I'd love to read an article written by Mr. Changsha.
Heh. That's unfortunate. But if the feminine hygiene product fits...vodean wrote:go get a tampon, elf. sorry.
he not could write article unless proof read someone article his.azezzo wrote:maybe qwert should write an article
i poorf read cood his articelsnatty_dread wrote:he not could write article unless proof read someone article his.azezzo wrote:maybe qwert should write an article
I have no idea what you are talking about.vodean wrote:He CHANGED HERES A TAMPON TO YOU ROCK! CHANGE YOUR VOTES!
attitudes like this by a member of the newsletter staff are exactly why it is such a wildly popular publication. most of you just seem to be out of touch with what people that frequent the forums want to read or find interesting or why people even routinely browse for whatever owen has posted for the day. keep up the team building excercises!!natty_dread wrote:I voted "hell no" on this one.
Nope. No bull here. In fact, I think it would be interesting to find a list of good writers who would be willing to write "contrarian" editorials once in awhile. But that is a two-way street isn't it? It means the willingness to work within a structure, agree to some parameters, and follow through with what has been agreed upon. But if that can be agreed to, an editor doesn't have to like a writer at all. Or even agree with the article. As long as it is transparent and fair and is a "true voice."fwblb wrote:attitudes like this by a member of the newsletter staff are exactly why it is such a wildly popular publication. most of you just seem to be out of touch with what people that frequent the forums want to read or find interesting or why people even routinely browse for whatever owen has posted for the day. keep up the team building excercises!!natty_dread wrote:I voted "hell no" on this one.
Natty. That really wasn't the point of this poll/post. At all. It was about the diversity of a community and the role of a newspaper/newsletter.natty_dread wrote:Also, has anyone thought of asking owenshooter, does he even want to write articles for the newsletter???
