Nathan BJ - Verge of First to 5000? 1883 points in 19 games!

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:09 pm

IF you havn't noticed, there is a seargeant named Nathan BJ who has completed 19 games and has 1883 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Has there ever been someone on Conquer club that has started out so well? He could be up into the general points and only be a lieutenant or a captain, i think that is incredible!

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:15 pm

That's very impressive.

Much claps for you Nathan.

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:21 pm

WOW, took me 679 games to get to 2008, and make Colonel. I'd say he has the best start. I may hold the record for taking the most games to get to Colonel. Is there anyone who is or has held the rank of Colonel, who took longer than 679 games??

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:38 pm

he is oviously good and he got there by facing good players

Jake Kelton · Post by **Jake Kelton** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:39 pm

I haven't been a part of here much, but I think that's an awesome start! Personally, I don't think I'm that great myself.

Post by **Evil Semp** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:45 pm

The title of this thread is a little misleading.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:52 pm

Evil Semp wrote:The title of this thread is a little misleading.

very

Jake Kelton · Post by **Jake Kelton** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:56 pm

AAFitz wrote:
Evil Semp wrote:The title of this thread is a little misleading.
very

Maybe something more of "Nathan BJ - Most points for a newbie?"

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:16 pm

there you go

Jake Kelton · Post by **Jake Kelton** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:20 pm

SS sem0me wrote:there you go

Oi, you can do what you want, but I disagree with your change.

n00b n, adj. (n /oo/ b) - Someone who asks stupid questions, is overall insanly irritating, begs for what he wants, and is not a good sport. Does not care that he/she may be a n00b, and often tends to unfairly call others n00bs to make them feel better.

Newbie adj. (n /oo/ b ee) - Someone who is new to something and so can make the mistake of asking silly questions, but is apologetic and tries his/her best to learn how to not be a newbie.

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:27 pm

Wut the hell???

Nous-irons · Post by **Nous-irons** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:31 pm

Jake Kelton wrote:
SS sem0me wrote:there you go
Oi, you can do what you want, but I disagree with your change.

n00b n, adj. (n /oo/ b) - Someone who asks stupid questions, is overall insanly irritating, begs for what he wants, and is not a good sport. Does not care that he/she may be a n00b, and often tends to unfairly call others n00bs to make them feel better.

Newbie adj. (n /oo/ b ee) - Someone who is new to something and so can make the mistake of asking silly questions, but is apologetic and tries his/her best to learn how to not be a newbie.

You need to learn IPA, man.

The first one is pronounced /'nub/, the second one /nub'i/. Note the stress marks.

Not even the bastardised American dictionaries (who use their corrupted long-short diacritic forms) use "oo" to represent the vowel /u/.

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:32 pm

This thread is not talking about stupid dictionary crap, lol!

Nous-irons · Post by **Nous-irons** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:33 pm

It's not dictionary crap, it's the International Phonetic Alphabet. Got difference. You see, if we romanised everything in IPA we wouldn't have obnoxious Westerners mispronouncing pinyin "Wang" as /w̃æŋ/ when it's in fact /waŋ/.

So I digress. This is an international community, yes?

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:34 pm

LoL you got me

Jake Kelton · Post by **Jake Kelton** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:35 pm

Nous-irons wrote:
Jake Kelton wrote:
SS sem0me wrote:there you go
Oi, you can do what you want, but I disagree with your change.

n00b n, adj. (n /oo/ b) - Someone who asks stupid questions, is overall insanly irritating, begs for what he wants, and is not a good sport. Does not care that he/she may be a n00b, and often tends to unfairly call others n00bs to make them feel better.

Newbie adj. (n /oo/ b ee) - Someone who is new to something and so can make the mistake of asking silly questions, but is apologetic and tries his/her best to learn how to not be a newbie.

You need to learn IPA, man.

The first one is pronounced /'nub/, the second one /nub'i/. Note the stress marks.

Not even the bastardised American dictionaries (who use their corrupted long-short diacritic forms) use "oo" to represent the vowel /u/.

That depends on whether you say "u" as oo or /u/. Personally, I say it mroe of a "uh" than a long /u/.

And no, those where spur of the moment definitions I made for the words. I do not pretend to be perfect. Thank you for showing me a new way to look at it.

Nous-irons · Post by **Nous-irons** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:50 pm

Yeah, but if you're giving a dicdef you have to use a standardised orthography - one phonetic vowel for each letter. Hence /u/ is always /u/. That's why it's found between slashes.

There are five graphemic vowels in the English alphabet. Humans are capable of producing 28 (English has about 11-14, depending on dialect), not including nasals, which doubles that number. This is a problem, no?

"Uh" is very ambiguous. I think you either mean the schwa /ə/ or the open mid-back unrounded vowel /ʌ/ .

So anyway, this was just a side note.

Jake Kelton · Post by **Jake Kelton** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:08 pm

Nous-irons wrote:Yeah, but if you're giving a dicdef you have to use a standardised orthography - one phonetic vowel for each letter. Hence /u/ is always /u/. That's why it's found between slashes.

There are five graphemic vowels in the English alphabet. Humans are capable of producing 28 (English has about 11-14, depending on dialect), not including nasals, which doubles that number. This is a problem, no?

"Uh" is very ambiguous. I think you either mean the schwa /ə/ or the open mid-back unrounded vowel /ʌ/ .

So anyway, this was just a side note.

Hmmm, English Major?

Thank you for you sound and logcial advice and I shall act on it in the future.

SS sem0me · Post by **SS sem0me** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:49 pm

I think Nathan BJ is off to the best start ever

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:59 pm

SS sem0me wrote:I think Nathan BJ is off to the best start ever

I think its your multi account.

Blind Date · Post by **Blind Date** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:08 pm

LOL..Everything about this thread makes me laugh!

Nathan BJ · Post by **Nathan BJ** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:44 am

Thanks for the compliments.

Too bad I can't freeze time though- looks like I'll lose my next 5.

Any march toward 5,000 points is going to be like a tortoise- I need to keep my active games to a minimum due to work demands.

Here is a player for your to watch- Haucky. I know him from the annual Risk tournament in PA. He is an awesome player and his point total after several games ain't too bad!

mercury7 · Post by **mercury7** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:17 am

i found a New Recruit on the 4th page. he/she had 1350 points in 4 games

)))

that is a greeat start though

Jake Kelton · Post by **Jake Kelton** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:14 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
SS sem0me wrote:I think Nathan BJ is off to the best start ever
I think its your multi account.

mercury7 wrote:i found a New Recruit on the 4th page. he/she had 1350 points in 4 games )))

that is a greeat start though

Cool!

Ninja-Town · Post by **Ninja-Town** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:30 pm

Check out Friskywife... she is 9 games in and has 1300 + points!

Nathan BJ - Verge of First to 5000? 1883 points in 19 games!

Has Nathan BJ had the best start ever on Conquer club?

Nathan BJ - Verge of First to 5000? 1883 points in 19 games!