Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
LOL first off, GO TROLL ANOTHER FORUMTHORNHEART wrote:lol first off
blah blah
this is becoming ridicolous.
Ok, back to topic:The Big Lebowski wrote: Snowgun: Were you listening to The Dude's story?
Thornheart: I was bowling.
Snowgun: So you have no frame of reference here, *thornheart*. You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie ...
Ok. Here is your problem Duke. As much as I've tried in this thread to defend your obvious ignorance of what is considered C&A punishable offenses, you obviously don't understand, so maybe a warning will put stuff into prospective:MNDuke wrote: In reference to some of the other scrutiny:
Such as this line: "
2010-01-16 16:36:25 - MNDuke: IF SO.....NO MORE GAMES FOR ME WITH GREEN.....TOO MUCH SECRET DIPLOMACY"
I was accusing my own friend of secret diplomacy. He likes to set up alliances and make truces with people in games. Via game chat.

ROFLMAO! Have you noticed i'm usually the guy on the OTHER side of the argument? I leave such aspirations up to JefJef.MNDuke wrote:Its as if you are trying to build a resume to become a mod.

For a guy tired of debating you sure don't quit. But we already know you'll do ANYTHING to win.MNDuke wrote:Riddle me this....how is this accusation brought against me any of your business?
Answer......it's not.

Case and point:As far as I can tell you want to be a moderator but haven't been given the authority to do so and god forbid you are ever granted with such power.
Have any more evidence or anything useful to say about this case? If not we should lock this....
Snowgun wrote:![]()
Cheaters gone wild.
![]()
LOOOOOOCK

Snowgun wrote:Damn MN, you are getting pretty torn up about being found out and exposed, your posts are sounding like broken records.
What you have to understand are the differences between facts and opinions:
Fact: You are a cheater with multiple instances of secret diplomacy.
Opinion: You should be punished.
Opinion: This thread should be locked, at the very least to keep thornheart at bay, unless you have any more evidence to present.
All we try to do here is find facts, and then provide opinions. You've certainly provided enough of your own. The mods will sort it out for sure. Don't get scared.
MNDuke wrote: I am not getting torn up in the slightest.
Wut?MNDuke wrote: More advice. People in glass houses should not cast stones.

Actually, it is. Accusations are everyone's business to some degree. Many try to insure other players are kept honest and "help" the mods...though some more than others. If you were communicating on the wall and not in the game it is against the rules...though it really doesnt seem as though the real intent was to cheat...but clearly...you cant communicate on the wall anymore, which im sure you will be warned of....if thats what happenedMNDuke wrote:Riddle me this....how is this accusation brought against me any of your business?
Answer......it's not.
A mute point is silent. A moot point is meaningless. Saying his point was mute, was moot.MNDuke wrote:I am just tired of your pettiness and your feeble attempts to prove mute points.
And thanks for the clarification on moot and mute. I jumped ahead of myself and did not proofread my work.As I stated just give me a warning so we can all move on. I have never actually participated in what is considered secret diplomacy. I have made mentions to it on my friend's wall, but it was a long time ago and I would have to plead ignorance. I did not know at the time it was considered secret diplomacy, had I, I would have never made such statements in jest or otherwise. However, I have never followed through on such statements.
Yes I understand your point. But there is such things as taking it too far which some people clearly do. They continuously go off topic and pick on anyone who doesn't agree with their opinion. Which, only takes away from the actual complaint and leads everyone astray from what is actually trying to be accomplished. It would be one thing if such opinions were clearly limited to the topic at hand and weren't on the verge of personal attacks. How are negative comments regarding THORNHEART furthering the argument at hand? That's just one example.Actually, it is. Accusations are everyone's business to some degree. Many try to insure other players are kept honest and "help" the mods...though some more than others. If you were communicating on the wall and not in the game it is against the rules...though it really doesnt seem as though the real intent was to cheat...but clearly...you cant communicate on the wall anymore, which im sure you will be warned of....if thats what happened
Look, Im not sure what thread you are talking about here, but it's ok to disagree with someone's opinion, that's the point. We had a good discussion on the other thread, even though we had differing points of view, but there was no "Picking" on anyone. If you put an opinion into the ring, which includes starting a C&A thread, you have to back it up. I challenged Poo's thread here about you just like I challenged your's about chaos.MNDuke wrote: Yes I understand your point. But there is such things as taking it too far which some people clearly do. They continuously go off topic and pick on anyone who doesn't agree with their opinion. Which, only takes away from the actual complaint and leads everyone astray from what is actually trying to be accomplished. It would be one thing if such opinions were clearly limited to the topic at hand and weren't on the verge of personal attacks. How are negative comments regarding THORNHEART furthering the argument at hand? That's just one example.
Differing opinions are one thing, but when someone personally attacks everyone's opinion because they don't agree they are only furthering everyone away from the real meaning of the C&A thread despite their claims. We don't need a vigilante trolling the C&A forum. That's what the mods are for. I say we let them do their job and sort the threads out instead of attacking everyone and anyone for just filing a complaint even if we don't agree with why it was made in the first place. That is not accomplishing anything, and anyone who can't see that is a damn fool.

Not trying to re-light the argument here, but i thought people posted in here to provide evidence or at least insight to the case. You basically just pointed out that you have done neither of these things, so there really isnt a need to post anything else besides these things. The only thing worse than the constant garbage threads being posted in here are the people who feel the need to post their perspective on EVERY case. Please, if you have played or have an affiliation to the accused/accuser, please post your side and it will be reviewed with the rest of the case. But theres no reason to make the mods read through 10 pages of nothing but rambling and spam, because opinions arent going to affect the outcome of the case.Snowgun wrote: I brought NONE of the evidence against you
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Posting your friend's private discussions now in the thread? You are Unbefuckinglevable. What is wrong with you?MNDuke wrote:I think this says it all:
2010-02-09 23:45:37 - Master Fenrir [team]: I foed Snowgun today. I'm tired of reading his posts in C&A. Posting "FAMO" in every thread is unhelpful and annoying.
2010-02-09 23:57:00 - Master Fenrir [team]: What Snowgun doesn't realize is that when people post a complaint in the C&A, they're in a highly irritated state. Typically being the first to respond and blowing them off by telling them "FAMO" only antagonizes them.
2010-02-09 23:58:00 - Master Fenrir [team]: He probably does realize it, unless he lacks all perception skills. In which case, intentionally posting material that you know will cause a negative reaction is the very definition of trolling.
2010-02-09 23:58:30 - Master Fenrir [team]: Which is why I foed him. His C&A posts are unthoughtful and inconsiderate.

Good point. I however did try to bring evidence that Miri probably wasn't involved... I apologize however for my part in garbaging up this thread.Gold Knight wrote:Not trying to re-light the argument here, but i thought people posted in here to provide evidence or at least insight to the case. You basically just pointed out that you have done neither of these things, so there really isnt a need to post anything else besides these things. The only thing worse than the constant garbage threads being posted in here are the people who feel the need to post their perspective on EVERY case. Please, if you have played or have an affiliation to the accused/accuser, please post your side and it will be reviewed with the rest of the case. But theres no reason to make the mods read through 10 pages of nothing but rambling and spam, because opinions arent going to affect the outcome of the case.Snowgun wrote: I brought NONE of the evidence against you
I also have NO evidence of the case, and apoligize to whatever hunter had to read through my and everyone else's post that dont add to this case.
I kinda disagree with you here, there are LOTS of threads where the discussion played a major part. Farming, ratings, ect.because opinions arent going to affect the outcome of the case.

I asked Fenrir if it would be ok if I could post his comments in this thread and he gave me his blessing. Not to mention, he spoke those words without me even making a mention of you. He came out and said it without your name or this thread even being mentioned. I can post the whole chat if it pleases you.Posting your friend's private discussions now in the thread? You are Unbefuckinglevable. What is wrong with you?
At least he FAMO'ed and didn't cook up needless C&A report...
The only reason this thread became a disaster is because you had to put your 2 cents in and get everyone off topic, as usual . If you would have just kept your opinions to yourself instead of distracting everyone from the real point, it would have never gotten to this. Just let the natural process take its course next time and keep your opinion's to yourself unless it's conducive to the case at hand. I'm just calling it like I see it.But f*ck this I am done with this thread, it's a disaster.
Snowgun wrote:Posting your friend's private discussions now in the thread? You are Unbefuckinglevable. What is wrong with you?MNDuke wrote:I think this says it all:
2010-02-09 23:45:37 - Master Fenrir [team]: I foed Snowgun today. I'm tired of reading his posts in C&A. Posting "FAMO" in every thread is unhelpful and annoying.
2010-02-09 23:57:00 - Master Fenrir [team]: What Snowgun doesn't realize is that when people post a complaint in the C&A, they're in a highly irritated state. Typically being the first to respond and blowing them off by telling them "FAMO" only antagonizes them.
2010-02-09 23:58:00 - Master Fenrir [team]: He probably does realize it, unless he lacks all perception skills. In which case, intentionally posting material that you know will cause a negative reaction is the very definition of trolling.
2010-02-09 23:58:30 - Master Fenrir [team]: Which is why I foed him. His C&A posts are unthoughtful and inconsiderate.
At least he FAMO'ed and didn't cook up needless C&A report...