Army of GOD wrote:At the moment I'm reading David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature. Don't read it unless you like deciphering obsolete English and philosophy.
Tolstoy is always better than I imagine him to be. Sometimes you get a view of a writer in your head, or a view of a novel, without actually reading. Tolstoy is one of those for me. Picking up Anna Karenina was an effort. Putting it down more so.Baron Von PWN wrote:The last book I read was Tolstoy's collected short works volume 2. Fun read it's a window into his mind. Allot of religious themed stories which emphasized the noble nature of peasants and their form of simple but honest faith.
AndyDufresne wrote:I've read a large number of books over the past couple of months...but hm, only a few I would recommend.
No-No Boy -- by John Okada (Fiction, 1957),
I haven't really. I usually don't dabble into that sphere of books, but there it is.Symmetry wrote:Sounds pretty interesting- have you read any of Richard Dawkins' stuff? The evolution books, not so much his anti-religion bits. Selfish Gene, Blind Watchmaker, and Climbing Mount Improbable have some similar arguments from an evolotionary biology perspective.BigBallinStalin wrote:Here ya go : Ishmael by Daniel Quinn
Ishmael is a 1992 philosophical novel by Daniel Quinn. It examines mythology, its effect on ethics, and how that relates to sustainability. The novel uses a style of Socratic dialogue to deconstruct the notion that humans are the end product, the pinnacle of biological evolution. It posits that human supremacy is a cultural myth, and asserts that modern civilization is "enacting" that myth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishmael_(novel)
Sounds interesting. Any way of finding out what they were, or whether Symmetry was right?rockfist wrote:I recently read a series of historical fiction books about Julius Caesar that were pretty good. I can't remember the titles though.
I skip-read that a few years ago. The old English was fine, but the philosophy is heavy.Army of GOD wrote:At the moment I'm reading David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature. Don't read it unless you like deciphering obsolete English and philosophy.


That oneSymmetry wrote:One of these? From Wiki:rockfist wrote:I recently read a series of historical fiction books about Julius Caesar that were pretty good. I can't remember the titles though.
Emperor Series, a series of four novels by the writer, Conn Iggulden
Sounds interesting, part of what I do with English Civil War history is related to the way that Caesar is treated in history (betrayer of the Republic, or virtuous emperor). I'm not going to ask you for a book review, but it'd be cool to know what you thought about him.rockfist wrote:That oneSymmetry wrote:One of these? From Wiki:rockfist wrote:I recently read a series of historical fiction books about Julius Caesar that were pretty good. I can't remember the titles though.
Emperor Series, a series of four novels by the writer, Conn Iggulden
Cheers, I've, personally, gone off Ken Follett stuff though. I honestly couldn't tell you why, but I don't really like his style. I guess a lot of it is to do with reading a lot around the period- not so much that he's wrong or anything like that, but more what Player said- you need a break from it.Frito Bandito wrote:If you enjoy English history I'd recomend the Ken Follett books- Pillars of the Earth & the sequel World Without End. They capture how life was for the aveage serf and more in the time period around Queen Isabel and Edward II and III.
Very different than his spy novels.
No problem- I'm more interested in how people have thought of him than anything that claims historical accuracy.rockfist wrote:Its historical fiction, so its hard to get a clear picture for who he was because there are some "liberties" the author takes in the book, such as making Marcus Brutus and Julius Caesar the same age and childhood friends, when I think Caesar was 10-12 years older IRL. The books generally portray Brutus as being the more sympathetic of the two main characters. I have not read much actual history about the life of Julius Caesar so I can't comment too much on it.
I read a good biography of Benedict Arnold by Willard Sterne Randall recently too. I will probably get in trouble with most of the Americans in this forum for saying so but the rebels really treated Arnold poorly and drove him to betray to betray the revolution. When my countrymen call Arnold a traitor they always look at me funny when I say "twice in fact."
Anyone know any good biographies of Arthur Duke of Wellington? I've read about Napoleon and Nelson and I'd like to read up on Wellington.
It's definitely taken me a gradual time to grow to enjoy some modern poetry---though there are still a great many of modern poets I tend not to enjoy---but I still appreciate their work nonetheless.Symmetry wrote: Actually, I'm pretty bad when it comes to modern poetry, so those last two sound really interesting. Poetry-wise I really likes "Taking off Emily Dickinson's Clothes" by Billy Collins. Genuinely funny stuff, and kind of an antidote to some of the po-faced images of modern poets.
Even if a Samurai's head were to be suddenly cut off, he should still be able to perform one more action with certainty. If one becomes like a revengeful ghost and shows great determination, though his head is cut off, he should not die.


That's a good one, and very much on my list. I guess Carl von Clausewitz "On War", and Machiavelli "The Prince" would be all that I can offer in response. You sound like Sun Tzu is something you covered already, but sorry if you've done the others.Snowgun wrote:also, "the book of the five rings" by musashi miyamoto is wonderful as well.
If you liked that, you should read his "the 50th law". It's pretty much a mash of 48 laws combined with insights from 50 cent (the rapper) about life lessons learned from the streets.Army of GOD wrote:Also, one book that I loved was the 48 Laws of Power. Gives a lot of historical context and stuff.

I did the Baroque Cycle and liked it.kevusher wrote:I'd agree with the Titus comment. Read the whole trilogy, and have no idea of the general plot (although the BBC did a good adaptation, I think just the first book, about 10-15 years ago), but have a wonderful image of the lands and characters.
If you like Historical Fiction then I would go with Stephenson's Baroque Cycle - generally set between Fire of London & post Glorious Revolution. Cornwell is a good shout too, though I found Sharpe the weakest thing he's done so far....