Moderator: Community Team
Judge a persons deeds not their words.luns101 wrote:I think most of the world has mis-information about who Jesus is
If marriage is a wholly religious, consecrated ceremony, then civil servants such as judges and notaries shouldn't be able to perform marriage ceremonies.Lord Canti wrote:As a fellow Christian, Roman Catholic to be precise, I wanted to ask the faithful of this site a question about society.
Many Christian religous groups condemn gay relations and marriage as a terrible sin, in accordance with the teachings of the Bible. However, they ignore another aspect of marriage that goes directly against the teachings of the Bible. I'm talking about divorce. The rate of divorce in America is about 50%. I haven't heard any outrage over this statistic. How can we pick and choose which parts of the Bible we will defend and which we will let slide? It leaves us weak.
Personally, I am tolarent on the issue of gay marriage, seeing as the rest of us have allowed marriage to become a joke, compared to the sacred religous ceremony it should be.
Yeah, I especially like the 2nd book in the series where he re-creates the whole "temptation in the Garden of Eden" scene...only doing it on another planet. I find it fascinating to speculate on what life would have been like if mankind had chosen not to sin in the first place. Lewis did a good job on that one.red bull wrote:yes and loved itAbishai wrote: Has anyone read Lewis' Space Trilogy?
I hope I haven't given you that impression. I agree with you that two separate types of marriage should, and do, exist. I don't think there is any problem at all with your suggestion. I don't see the need to force anyone to conform with me or my faith, if they don't hold share my beliefs.vtmarik wrote:
EDIT: Sorry, I realize that I don't belong here.... I'll go away now.
Wow, that opens a whole can of worms doesn't it? I agree it does weaken us to a point. For instance:Lord Canti wrote:How can we pick and choose which parts of the Bible we will defend and which we will let slide? It leaves us weak.
Personally, I am tolarent on the issue of gay marriage, seeing as the rest of us have allowed marriage to become a joke, compared to the sacred religous ceremony it should be.
I think you are partially right. Yes, we have free will to choose to either follow or disobey God. But we do not get to choose the consequence of that disobedience.CrazyAnglican wrote:Personal choice and free will are both integral parts of Christianity. God allows us to make our own choices hoping that we will choose him of our own free will.vtmarik wrote:
EDIT: Sorry, I realize that I don't belong here.... I'll go away now.
beezer wrote: Yes, we have free will to choose to either follow or disobey God. But we do not get to choose the consequence of that disobedience.
Perhaps Christians do spend more time condemning one sin over another. Also, I think it depends on which culture you live in. Certain countries may take a great amount of offense to certain sins more than others, which also influences the Christians who happen to live there.Lord Canti wrote:Many Christian religous groups condemn gay relations and marriage as a terrible sin, in accordance with the teachings of the Bible. However, they ignore another aspect of marriage that goes directly against the teachings of the Bible. I'm talking about divorce. The rate of divorce in America is about 50%. I haven't heard any outrage over this statistic. How can we pick and choose which parts of the Bible we will defend and which we will let slide? It leaves us weak.
Wow, self righteous, delusional and condescending all in the space of a few lines.freyme wrote: One of the hardest things for me is to remember to not judge others. How can I expect people that are not believers to live to the standards of the Bible? This does not mean that I approve of all the things that people do.
Aradhus wrote:Not one of you christians can live up to that idealistic pish. You know why? Because you're human beings...(probably, hopefully)