Moderator: Clan Directors

That is an awesome use of the random map. Takes balls to step in to that one.Master Fenrir wrote:First blood to IA with Herpes taking 4 of 5 in LoW's singles games.

I thought so, too. First post updated.Lubawski wrote:That is an awesome use of the random map. Takes balls to step in to that one.


eh, so far. We will have to work a little harder the second half of the games.waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.
How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

chephren wrote:How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.
If you lost 21 total in dubs, and 15 total in trips + quads, but there were twice as many dubs as trips+quads, you had a better win percentage in dubs than trips+quads.waseemalim wrote:chephren wrote:How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.
More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.

Lubawski wrote:If you lost 21 total in dubs, and 15 total in trips + quads, but there were twice as many dubs as trips+quads, you had a better win percentage in dubs than trips+quads.waseemalim wrote:chephren wrote:How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.
More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.
Seeing how the Trips & Quads are going so far, you guys shouldn´t have much to worry.reptile wrote:We will have to work a little harder the second half of the games.

waseemalim wrote:Check your math. Number of dubs = number of trips + number of quads.Lubawski wrote:If you lost 21 total in dubs, and 15 total in trips + quads, but there were twice as many dubs as trips+quads, you had a better win percentage in dubs than trips+quads.waseemalim wrote:chephren wrote:How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.
More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.
We played 56 dubs, 28 trips, 28 quads. Our Win % in dubs is 62.5% (35/56). Our win % in trips + quads is 73.2% (41/56).

If you had done your HW, you might have made top 10%. . ha ha ha. . .Dai_atan wrote:You're both an insult to Academia.
Signed,
Some one who passed both your classes by never doing home work, never listening in class and then walking into an exam at the end of the year to score in the top 90%.
I tend not to give "exams". I prefer essays. And you wouldn't have only been listening in class. You would have been leading it. I don't lecture, I have the students lead discussions. If I need to guide them somewhere they missed, I do so, but that doesn't have to happen often.Dai_atan wrote:You're both an insult to Academia.
Signed,
Some one who passed both your classes by never doing home work, never listening in class and then walking into an exam at the end of the year to score in the top 90%.
How slow was your class that it takes that long to learn how to format an essay? What poor teachers you must have had. That explains how you ended up at the Legion at least.Dai_atan wrote:just pointing out that the standard education systems today are a laugh. I am not saying I didn't learn, but when you're spending most of your time learning how to format your essay answer rather than learning the content (in history at least) That's a bad sign.


Haha, it's hard to talk through clenched teeth. The majority of us are in a foul mood and doing our best to remain patient and hope for better luck in the 2nd set. You probably won't hear much from us until then.Lubawski wrote:Back on topic. Looks like a great battle so far...and a quiet one.
