Adjacent Attacks

[Catarah]

awesome news, the sooner we implent this the awesomer:D

[yeti_c]

I think this calls for a W00T!

C.

[n00blet]

W00T!

[-=- Tanarri -=-]

Just in case anyone's interested, I'm trying to organize AA speed games. If you are interested, check out the thread in Callouts at http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 1&t=118228

[ViperOverLord]

I like the idea, but if you start making to many settings, the common CC'er is going to struggle. If you created an advanced games option at some point and included that as an option then that'd be good.

[TheForgivenOne]

If you created an advanced games option at some point and included that as an option then that'd be good.

Make this a new suggestion for this

[-=- Tanarri -=-]

Just out of curiosity, has there been any discussion on how adjacent attacks would work in freestyle games?

[TheForgivenOne]

My guess is yes, but i may get N00blet in here to clarify, as he probably knows more about the thread then me

[n00blet]

Just out of curiosity, has there been any discussion on how adjacent attacks would work in freestyle games?

I believe we did discuss it briefly....I think we decided it should be about the same. Meaning, you can only attack from the territories you start from, but as soon as you lose a territory its taken off the list of territories you can attack with.

So if you lose your front line armies to a quick first-5 second push, you can conquer back those territories with the ones you had behind them, but you can't attack with that newly-reacquired front line until the next round. Does that make sense?

[OliverFA]

Just out of curiosity, has there been any discussion on how adjacent attacks would work in freestyle games?

I believe we did discuss it briefly....I think we decided it should be about the same. Meaning, you can only attack from the territories you start from, but as soon as you lose a territory its taken off the list of territories you can attack with.

So if you lose your front line armies to a quick first-5 second push, you can conquer back those territories with the ones you had behind them, but you can't attack with that newly-reacquired front line until the next round. Does that make sense?

Right. When the turn starts, the list of "attacking territories" is created. As the turn evolves, some territories will be removed from the list as they change ownership. But no territory can be added until next turn begins.

[Ace Rimmer]

Just out of curiosity, has there been any discussion on how adjacent attacks would work in freestyle games?

I believe we did discuss it briefly....I think we decided it should be about the same. Meaning, you can only attack from the territories you start from, but as soon as you lose a territory its taken off the list of territories you can attack with.

So if you lose your front line armies to a quick first-5 second push, you can conquer back those territories with the ones you had behind them, but you can't attack with that newly-reacquired front line until the next round. Does that make sense?

Right. When the turn starts, the list of "attacking territories" is created. As the turn evolves, some territories will be removed from the list as they change ownership. But no territory can be added until next turn begins.

When your turn starts, not the round, correct? It would be basically the same thing, but you wouldn't need to generate the list until you actually started your turn.

[OliverFA]

Right again. It would be a lot more efficient to do it when yout turn starts, because you save adding a lot of territories to the list that will change ownership before you actualy begin your turn.

[n00blet]

[But no territory can be added until next turn begins.

With the exception of Killer Neutrals of course

[OliverFA]

To make it more efficient. Killer neutrals shoul always be in the list. No need to remove or add it

[n00blet]

To make it more efficient. Killer neutrals shoul always be in the list. No need to remove or add it

Oh yeahhhh...

I knew that

[OliverFA]

I guess we are too eager to have this feature implemented that we jump to provide any possible help

[Catarah]

i just cant wait for this to be implented!

[-=- Tanarri -=-]

Very much looking forward to it being implemented as well. I love playing this way as it adds so much more strategy to the game. Unfortunately it's also way too easy to mix up the AA games with the non-AA games and make mistakes, which sometimes can kill a game without the actual code being implemented.

[OliverFA]

I am looking forward to it too. Games are much more exciting in AA mode.

[fumandomuerte]

please please please implement it, I beg you all mighty CC coder

[Catarah]

yeah, i´m getting tired of making mistakes in our tournament because the actual rule still aint implented.. pretty please with sugar on top, implement it!

[OliverFA]

Please please!

[OliverFA]

The recent XML update brings me new hopes that this suggestion could be implemented soon

[Victor Sullivan]

Yeah, can't ignore almost 200 supporters.

[rdsrds2120]

Yeah, can't ignore almost 200 supporters.

I betcha' you could...it just wouldn't be wise (: