Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Almost certainly not multis.wizworm wrote:Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct
Haha! You just made my day mate!wizworm wrote:Accused:
Blitzaholic
Jobiwan
manic_prophet
american_ninja
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Other:
Game number(s):
Game 6994908
Comments:
Quads game, manual troops, all 4 team members deployed all troops to the 1 player who happens to be ranked general.
on their turn the multi accounts deploy all of their units to the general and never attack. Even if the're human players this is at best unsportsmanlike conduct
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?
Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.
Don't like it? don't play manual
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Hey. You can decide who is on your team, most of the time. But you can rarely ever decide who your playing against in public games. Anyone could join.Army of GOD wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?
Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.
Don't like it? don't play manual
I'm the insane guy, that you never wanna meet... See the end of my blade? It's sharp. hehetdans wrote:lets rock this joint... or.. lets have them Blow this,,,,,, joint
Whats with the crap attitude? Rank envy?Army of GOD wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.TheForgivenOne wrote:Do you seriously think that this is a bad strategy?
Me and my quads team do it all the time. It's a smart strategy to use.
Don't like it? don't play manual
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.Bones2484 wrote:Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".

well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have?jefjef wrote:So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.Bones2484 wrote:Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
Rank envy much? So so SAD.
EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)

clapper011 wrote:well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have?jefjef wrote:So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.Bones2484 wrote:Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
Rank envy much? So so SAD.
EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.))
is that an invite to team up with me then eddie?...eddie2 wrote:clapper011 wrote:well the one thing about this is that he is one of the few of the higher ranks (there is a few out there that will) play with the lower ranks. Thus including myself (note the lower rank i have?jefjef wrote:So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.Bones2484 wrote:Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
Rank envy much? So so SAD.
EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.))
I only capitalized AGAINST to put an extra emphasis on the fact that he's the only player above Sargent in the game.jefjef wrote:So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.Bones2484 wrote:Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
Rank envy much? So so SAD.
EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)
Well this isn't one of those cases is it?Army of GOD wrote:I only capitalized AGAINST to put an extra emphasis on the fact that he's the only player above Sargent in the game.jefjef wrote:So because of his rank you condemn him for playing games with strippers. That entire line of thought is pathetic. If you look AoG capitalized AGAINST.Bones2484 wrote:Did you read his post? I think you missed a key part of it that explains exactly how Blitz gains tons of points from this when he shouldnt. Let me bold it for you.clapper011 wrote:AOG, he is in team one, the lower ranks joined as team 2, so they joined "against" him and the others.
Very pathetic indeed. Hopefully if he makes conq again he'll at least give himself one of those fancy "farming" tags in the thread he upkeeps.AoG wrote:I don't think it's a bad strategy, but I do find it pathetic that he's playing with low rankings AGAINST low rankings.
Rank envy much? So so SAD.
EDIT: Hey blitz I'll join ya in a few dubs against some of these whiners and farm their points with ya. (except for bones. He's never coming off foe.)
And, yea, he can't choose who joins his games but sometimes he KNOWS who's going to join. Like when someone makes 40 1v1 games on Feudal and 37 fill up with New Recruits.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".