Moderator: Community Team
The Koreans were awesome today, defended really well and their striker did really well. Great second goal for Brazil.the.killing.44 wrote:PRK's defense was really great until they gave up that first goal (which was very stupid). But after that it looked like they lost a lot of confidence.
Elano's goal and the assist were beautiful.
HA! As I was writing this, the Koreans scored.


I don't know whether we're being trolled here or you just have no idea what you're talking about on many, many different levels. I'm gonna play it safe.ViperOverLord wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the English press are a bunch of biotches. They have a lot of nerve calling that a win for us. We are ranked 14th, not far behind their 9th. And going into it a draw was never a win. England soccer fans are arrogant whiny punks and I only hope we meet you in the second round so that we can take care of some unfinished business.
And World Cup shocker? Please. We fully expected to get at least a tie from this game. We had a mental lapse that gave England a goal. England's Green had a huge error. But Altidore almost won it on his shot. And we had more chances than England. Shocker? I have rooted for England as my 2nd team (since I"m mostly British heritage) since 1990. So I know all about the good teams that choked. If anything Britons should be more humble and not disrespect their opponents like this.
I see your point but I think it was a combination of bad luck and excellent goalkeeping rather than Messi being off form. Wasn't his day, but it looks like Argentina are finally starting to make the most of him.xxtig12683xx wrote:icedagger wrote:Messi looked very, very good. I don't know how you could watch the game and say thatxxtig12683xx wrote:
-ps. for you argentina fans, ok not a bad showing but messi looks off and i watched prolly 25 of his la liga games...different team not the same player.
Yea, im not saying he didnt look good, but the messi i watched all year finished those, he easily should have had 2 goals...but he got off 8 shots and really dictated the offense. i just think he was a little off
-tig

I didn't pick anybody either. I think maybe people are just having fun, but I don't think it's as clear cut as Spain and Brazil are dominant. Germany looked really good btw. They looked the best so far, but Spain hasn't played yet.grifftron wrote:I didn't pick Spain to win the cup but looks like most people in this thread did, see how your guys team does tonight![]()
Not impressed with 5 time champs last night either, 2-1 against NKorea... PLEASE
sucks about Nani too, Port really needed him last night.
-griff
Decide to take the foot out of your mouth and remove all doubt did you? I was calling a spade a spade. Thanks for demonstrating my point. You have no idea how over-rated your team is. Nobody fears your team. So don't try to blame it on trolling. That's just sad. I made one simple rational point and you try to pretend 'ah darr your just so stupid on so many levels.' I'll give you a spoon and you can eat my ass.icedagger wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the English press are a bunch of biotches. They have a lot of nerve calling that a win for us. We are ranked 14th, not far behind their 9th. And going into it a draw was never a win. England soccer fans are arrogant whiny punks and I only hope we meet you in the second round so that we can take care of some unfinished business.
And World Cup shocker? Please. We fully expected to get at least a tie from this game. We had a mental lapse that gave England a goal. England's Green had a huge error. But Altidore almost won it on his shot. And we had more chances than England. Shocker? I have rooted for England as my 2nd team (since I"m mostly British heritage) since 1990. So I know all about the good teams that choked. If anything Britons should be more humble and not disrespect their opponents like this.

I give England a chance but as I already mentioned, I do think they are over-rated and I would bet against them to not reach the semis as usual. USA I think is more talented then people like the a-hole above gives us credit for. I don't think we have much of a chance of winning it because of our lack of a solid striker. And I think England did expose some of our back line breakdowns.grifftron wrote:I actually have a list of teams i am cheering for, 1 which WILL win the world cup this year
Portugal, Germany, USA, England or Argentina WILL win this year.
-griff
I fully agree the England team isn't great and that we will almost certainly not win the world cup. I thought you were trolling because you dissected a US paper's page on the match at great length as evidence for the English press being "biotches", English arrogance etc. You also made a comment about us possibly meeting the US in the second round, which would indicate you know almost nothing about how the tournament works.ViperOverLord wrote:Decide to take the foot out of your mouth and remove all doubt did you? I was calling a spade a spade. Thanks for demonstrating my point. You have no idea how over-rated your team is. Nobody fears your team. So don't try to blame it on trolling. That's just sad. I made one simple rational point and you try to pretend 'ah darr your just so stupid on so many levels.' I'll give you a spoon and you can eat my ass.icedagger wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the English press are a bunch of biotches. They have a lot of nerve calling that a win for us. We are ranked 14th, not far behind their 9th. And going into it a draw was never a win. England soccer fans are arrogant whiny punks and I only hope we meet you in the second round so that we can take care of some unfinished business.
And World Cup shocker? Please. We fully expected to get at least a tie from this game. We had a mental lapse that gave England a goal. England's Green had a huge error. But Altidore almost won it on his shot. And we had more chances than England. Shocker? I have rooted for England as my 2nd team (since I"m mostly British heritage) since 1990. So I know all about the good teams that choked. If anything Britons should be more humble and not disrespect their opponents like this.
I guess I accept that apology lol.icedagger wrote:I fully agree the England team isn't great and that we will almost certainly not win the world cup. I thought you were trolling because you dissected a US paper's page on the match at great length as evidence for the English press being "biotches", English arrogance etc. You also made a comment about us possibly meeting the US in the second round, which would indicate you know almost nothing about how the tournament works.ViperOverLord wrote:Decide to take the foot out of your mouth and remove all doubt did you? I was calling a spade a spade. Thanks for demonstrating my point. You have no idea how over-rated your team is. Nobody fears your team. So don't try to blame it on trolling. That's just sad. I made one simple rational point and you try to pretend 'ah darr your just so stupid on so many levels.' I'll give you a spoon and you can eat my ass.icedagger wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the English press are a bunch of biotches. They have a lot of nerve calling that a win for us. We are ranked 14th, not far behind their 9th. And going into it a draw was never a win. England soccer fans are arrogant whiny punks and I only hope we meet you in the second round so that we can take care of some unfinished business.
And World Cup shocker? Please. We fully expected to get at least a tie from this game. We had a mental lapse that gave England a goal. England's Green had a huge error. But Altidore almost won it on his shot. And we had more chances than England. Shocker? I have rooted for England as my 2nd team (since I"m mostly British heritage) since 1990. So I know all about the good teams that choked. If anything Britons should be more humble and not disrespect their opponents like this.
Coming from you, that means nothing if anything.Army of GOD wrote:^^
What icedagger said.
Viper, you're truly making a fool of yourself.
a. - That headline is lame regardless of who posted it. I was not doing cart wheels when we got the draw. I went into it think we could win.the.killing.44 wrote:a) that's the American press
b) the USA went in HOPING for a draw
c) the paper is being witty while still making a point, because
d) a tie for the USA was a great psychological victory
e) England is overrated but still a very good team
f) England is #8
g) stfu
a) I was playing a baseball game and when I heard the score I got really pumped. I can't do a cartwheel but I was certainly jumping aroundViperOverLord wrote:a. - That headline is lame regardless of who posted it. I was not doing cart wheels when we got the draw. I went into it think we could win.the.killing.44 wrote:a) that's the American press
b) the USA went in HOPING for a draw
c) the paper is being witty while still making a point, because
d) a tie for the USA was a great psychological victory
e) England is overrated but still a very good team
f) England is #8
g) stfu
b. Never at any time heading into that match, was the US playing for a draw. Check all the interviews and pundits and you'll see that.
c. The paper is not witty. They are imbecilic.
d. A draw was something we were willing to settle for. That's a far shot off from a psychological victory. Obviously any time you're playing the best team in your group and you know you can get the other 2 games then you want salvage value. That's just simple math.
e. That's exactly what I said.
f. #9 vs #14 when I looked. What did a new rank come out? Who gives a rats....It's the same thing.
g. You can take the spoon and dig in instead.
a - Maybe you should stick to baseball. Because a draw was pretty much the most likely outcome to begin with. You do realize that there is a hair's difference between 9 and 14 at the WC right?the.killing.44 wrote:a) I was playing a baseball game and when I heard the score I got really pumped. I can't do a cartwheel but I was certainly jumping aroundViperOverLord wrote:a. - That headline is lame regardless of who posted it. I was not doing cart wheels when we got the draw. I went into it think we could win.the.killing.44 wrote:a) that's the American press
b) the USA went in HOPING for a draw
c) the paper is being witty while still making a point, because
d) a tie for the USA was a great psychological victory
e) England is overrated but still a very good team
f) England is #8
g) stfu
b. Never at any time heading into that match, was the US playing for a draw. Check all the interviews and pundits and you'll see that.
c. The paper is not witty. They are imbecilic.
d. A draw was something we were willing to settle for. That's a far shot off from a psychological victory. Obviously any time you're playing the best team in your group and you know you can get the other 2 games then you want salvage value. That's just simple math.
e. That's exactly what I said.
f. #9 vs #14 when I looked. What did a new rank come out? Who gives a rats....It's the same thing.
g. You can take the spoon and dig in instead.
b) obviously not on the surface, but we were beyond pleased with the result (besides the AMERICA F UCK YEAH's)
c) COMMUNISTS
d) we were way beyond willing to "settle for" a draw
e) you went off about English arrogance
f) May 26th http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/ranki ... nking.html (they were #8 on Apr. 10th, too)
g) I love ice cream
Yeah, awesome eh. I have a brother in law that is a kiwi, love it!thewarisnow wrote:yay new zealand has its first ever world cup point

Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
It was the New York PostViperOverLord wrote: I was not aware it was a US paper (if it is)
