gay people

[GabonX]

Calling homosexuality a mental problem, wow that is a little out there.

No it isn't..

I think that there is something wrong in gay people. Not something that need to be fixed, not something really wrong, or disabling, but wrong as a defect. An unbalance.

Calling it a defect already wields a moral judgement into it. If you still have an ounce of reason, why exactly are you calling that a defect? What does it prevent them to do? How does it unbalance them?

A. It doesn't necessarily wield a moral judgment, and B. It prevents them from reproducing, a basic function of life and the purpose of sexuality.

People are programmed to have sexuality because it facilitates reproduction. Homosexuality is hedonism without function or purpose and like all sexual action it does present dangers to those who engage in it..

Well, that means in summary you are close-minded. Which we could have reckoned from the first post.

You're probably much more close minded.

[The Bison King]

It does not make sense to change the subject to straight men smelling women's farts. Women do not let farts anyways...

I'm trying to change the subject because this conversation is retarded!

Retardation in a mental problem, not gayness


But seriously guys check out these dirty love letters James Joyce wrote. They are Fucking Hilarious!!


http://fuckyeahmodernism.tumblr.com/pos ... o-his-wife

[Woodruff]

There are fewer straight guys who prefer the female stinker than there are gay guys who prefer the male stinker

Well...duh. <grin>

People are programmed to have sexuality because it facilitates reproduction. Homosexuality is hedonism without function or purpose and like all sexual action it does present dangers to those who engage in it..

You don't believe there is ANY function or purpose to homosexual sex?

[b.k. barunt]

Call it whateverthefuck you want but the thought of a man lusting after the hairy ass of another man is not pretty. Ew.


Honibaz

[bradleybadly]

As for necrophelia, it involves no consent and therefore is not OK

What if it was part of someone's last will and testament?

[nietzsche]

I actually like gay men, more women for us

And lesbians, while it sucks to be sent away in a bar because she's lesbian, it compensates when they french-kiss in public.

Bisexual.. I don't know, there was a bisexual girl who wanted to go out with me but I couldn't do anything because I was introduced to her by a good friend of mine who wanted her for him. At one point I suspected she wanted to do a threesome, which is not okay with me when there are more than 1 sword.

To support Falkomagno, I've always believed that gay people will go to hell and pay for their sins.

Actually, I believe it's a hormonal imbalance, or neurotransmitter imbalance; whichever is first, it causes the second anyway. Surely it's only wrong when one consider as virtues all the manly characteristics, but if we we're considering cleanliness, house decoration or event planning as the virtues, then not being gay would be wrong. It is what it is, and certainly is rare since we found that around 1 of every 100 is gay

[saxitoxin]

Homosexuals are class heroes. It is a necessary component of the revolutionary struggle to smash the dominant sexual practice as it is necessary to smash all conventions and norms.

All Marxist-Leninists must ask themselves if they are man enough to throw off the bourgeois shackles of heterosexual monogamy for, as there can be no revolution without sexual revolution, there can be no sexual revolution without homosexual revolution.

In the words of the American heroes the Weather Underground:

Are you revolutionary enough to smash your closest relationships? Are you revolutionary enough to give-up your girlfriends?

This is a sacrifice ol' Saxi was never able to make but I laud those who are. All high offices in the state and flag officerships in the armed forces should be given over to homosexuals.

[Woodruff]

As for necrophelia, it involves no consent and therefore is not OK

What if it was part of someone's last will and testament?

That is an interesting question.

[PLAYER57832]

As for necrophelia, it involves no consent and therefore is not OK

What if it was part of someone's last will and testament?

I thought of that. They might have changed their mind after.

Also, unlike homosexuality, this very well might result in harm to others... but no details here. I don't want to get into that subject, sorry.

The biggest reason, in truth is that this is just one of those truly universal "no's", except for a few ill individuals. Homosesuxuality, by contrast, has always been accepted by some groups (and not by other groups).
Homosexuality IS found in the animal kingdom, among normally heterosexual farm animals, etc. Necrophilia is not. That is not true proof of anything, but it does tend to indicate homosexuality is something natural, not utterly unnatural, whereas necrophilia is utterly unnatural.

[GabonX]

lol

[demonfork]

As for necrophelia, it involves no consent and therefore is not OK

What if it was part of someone's last will and testament?

I thought of that. They might have changed their mind after.

Also, unlike homosexuality, this very well might result in harm to others... but no details here. I don't want to get into that subject, sorry.

The biggest reason, in truth is that this is just one of those truly universal "no's", except for a few ill individuals. Homosesuxuality, by contrast, has always been accepted by some groups (and not by other groups).
Homosexuality IS found in the animal kingdom, among normally heterosexual farm animals, etc. Necrophilia is not. That is not true proof of anything, but it does tend to indicate homosexuality is something natural, not utterly unnatural, whereas necrophilia is utterly unnatural.

What do you call this?

[GabonX]

lol x 2

[PLAYER57832]

Cannot see it, probably glad for that.

If you are trying to bring up an example of necrophilia in mammals, it doesn't change what I said. Most farmers can point to animals that are "attracted" to their own gender, but not necrophiliac animals. A few aberrations might well exist in this wide world.

If you pictured lower animals, I should have specified. I mean, black widows eat their mates.

[PLAYER57832]

Call it whateverthefuck you want but the thought of a man lusting after the hairy ass of another man is not pretty. Ew.


Honibaz

I would agree. But then, so is eating liver... or pickled gizzards... or fermented yak's milk... etc.

Not too partial to gragorian chants, either.

[oVo]

Well I guess people's bigoted views are revealed when they have been drinking,
which you have clearly been.

Drinking? I thought stupidity was the obvious choice as he revels in his ignorance
and shares it by trolling teh innerwebs.

[rockfist]

If homosexuality makes people happy then I do not care. I do not want to see homosexual sex, but I have many many heterosexual friends who I do not want to see having sex either. I don't want it being taught to my children other than "its something some people do." or something to that effect. I don't think homosexuals should be ridiculed for just going about their lives or anything like that, but I am not pro-gay "rights" either.

[GabonX]

Cannot see it, probably glad for that.

If you are trying to bring up an example of necrophilia in mammals, it doesn't change what I said. Most farmers can point to animals that are "attracted" to their own gender, but not necrophiliac animals. A few aberrations might well exist in this wide world.

If you pictured lower animals, I should have specified. I mean, black widows eat their mates.

He posted a picture of a mouse mating with another mouse who's head was crushed in a mouse trap.

Kees Moeliker has shown work attesting to necrophilia in ducks.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/200 ... n.research

[jigger1986]

and the award for most ridiculous post ever goes to..........................................the moron who started this thread.

p.s.- im not gay and your ideas still offend me.

[jimboston]

If homosexuality makes people happy then I do not care. I do not want to see homosexual sex, but I have many many heterosexual friends who I do not want to see having sex either. I don't want it being taught to my children other than "its something some people do." or something to that effect. I don't think homosexuals should be ridiculed for just going about their lives or anything like that, but I am not pro-gay "rights" either.

I think this is a good summary of what the majority of people feel... at least in the U.S. if not elsewhere. I have to think it's a big majority... like 70-80%.

The problem is the two extremes, though they are small percentages are very loud.

I wish the rest of us could stomp them till they just shut up. (I mean this to apply to both extremes in this debate.)

[InkL0sed]

If homosexuality makes people happy then I do not care. I do not want to see homosexual sex, but I have many many heterosexual friends who I do not want to see having sex either. I don't want it being taught to my children other than "its something some people do." or something to that effect. I don't think homosexuals should be ridiculed for just going about their lives or anything like that, but I am not pro-gay "rights" either.

I was with you until the last sentence - what do you mean putting rights in quotations, and what do you mean you are not pro-gay rights? I mean, it seems like you think gays should have rights. Is it that you don't think they should be able to marry? Why not?

[jimboston]

If homosexuality makes people happy then I do not care. I do not want to see homosexual sex, but I have many many heterosexual friends who I do not want to see having sex either. I don't want it being taught to my children other than "its something some people do." or something to that effect. I don't think homosexuals should be ridiculed for just going about their lives or anything like that, but I am not pro-gay "rights" either.

I was with you until the last sentence - what do you mean putting rights in quotations, and what do you mean you are not pro-gay rights? I mean, it seems like you think gays should have rights. Is it that you don't think they should be able to marry? Why not?

I can't speak for Rock... that said I am guessing he mean 'special rights' that apply only to homosexuals. Of course the should have the standard human rights that everyone has.

Now... where you can start a different debate is if homosexual marriage is a std. right or a special right different from the rigths of others.

Let me make a better example... I am complete opposed to "Hate Crime" legislation. If you beat someone up, there are plenty of laws on the books that say you can't do it. Why does there need to be a 'special' right???

I mean if Person A beats Person B to near death... Person A should be punished... to me it doesn't matter if Person A beat up Person B because he was stealing from him, because he thought he was ugly, because he looked at him funny, etc. The end result is the same.

[rockfist]

I mean I am not for special rights...they want hospital visitation rights ect. I do not care they can have those. Any right that does not require me to pay for it they can have, if it costs me money I oppose it (in just about anything not just in relation to gays).

[Woodruff]

Now... where you can start a different debate is if homosexual marriage is a std.

There have been many times when I thought it might be...

(Sorry...I know I thoroughly mis-quoted you. That's just how I read it the first time through, and thought it was pretty funny.)

[Woodruff]

Now... where you can start a different debate is if homosexual marriage is a std. right or a special right different from the rigths of others.

Because of the legalities involved, I have to believe it is a standard right. However, should those legalities be removed, then I don't care much whether homosexuals can marry or not.

Let me make a better example... I am complete opposed to "Hate Crime" legislation. If you beat someone up, there are plenty of laws on the books that say you can't do it. Why does there need to be a 'special' right???

I agree completely.

[Falkomagno]

and the award for most ridiculous post ever goes to..........................................the moron who started this thread.

p.s.- im not gay and your ideas still offend me.

Well, you feel offended because your ideas are weak, and your character deal in that way with opinions that differes from yours, since is a threat to your vulnerable mental system.

In the other hand, I don't feel offended when you call me "the most ridiculos poster", or "moron", since I know what I am, and I kind to figure the unimportance of your personality to my general view.

It's pretty clear that when people start insulting others, just because don't have the same opinions, there is some fear inside those rants. Don't be afraid, and try to build a stronger belief system, so, in upcoming situations, you will come out with something more meaningful than an insult