Moderator: Community Team
The subject is far too wide-ranging to be a debateable topic. As B.K. points out...it can be either, depending on the circumstances.jimboston wrote:Good or Bad?
===
Discuss
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Otherwise everything would seem the same.MeDeFe wrote:Discriminating between things is ok.
... but discriminating between people is not?MeDeFe wrote:Discriminating between things is ok.
As we said, the subject is far too wide-ranging to be a valid topic. You're going to have to narrow the focus. Specificity is in order.jimboston wrote:... but discriminating between people is not?MeDeFe wrote:Discriminating between things is ok.
I suppose it can be.jimboston wrote:... but discriminating between people is not?MeDeFe wrote:Discriminating between things is ok.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Sometimes its best to just admit you cannot do something and move on. For example, I cannot tell a decent joke. (except once in a very rare while, by accidence )King Doctor wrote:All forms of discrimination are obviously OK, regardless of the context or grounds.
The type that I especially like, more than all the rest, is when somebody comes for a job interview and you are all like "no way is this job for you dude, you don't look like me and my buddy Jim and I find your funny hair kind of weird looking, you would probably have more fun in a job where you clean out the insides of bins forever and stuff" that type is the best.
Is this in the forum rules?john9blue wrote:You can't just ask some vague question and use it as a "gotcha" later on to imply that we agree with some dumb policy.
#1 - Player here is a another example of how your comment doesn't apply in any way to the quote you are including. Please explain what your comment has to do with anything the Good Doctor said.PLAYER57832 wrote:Sometimes its best to just admit you cannot do something and move on. For example, I cannot tell a decent joke. (except once in a very rare while, by accidence )King Doctor wrote:All forms of discrimination are obviously OK, regardless of the context or grounds.
The type that I especially like, more than all the rest, is when somebody comes for a job interview and you are all like "no way is this job for you dude, you don't look like me and my buddy Jim and I find your funny hair kind of weird looking, you would probably have more fun in a job where you clean out the insides of bins forever and stuff" that type is the best.
OberstLt Karl S. Toxin, M.D., Psy.D. (ret.)King Doctor wrote:All forms of discrimination are obviously OK, regardless of the context or grounds.
The type that I especially like, more than all the rest, is when somebody comes for a job interview and you are all like "no way is this job for you dude, you don't look like me and my buddy Jim and I find your funny hair kind of weird looking, you would probably have more fun in a job where you clean out the insides of bins forever and stuff" that type is the best.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
As a doctor, I feel that it is my duty to diagnose the root of this problem.PLAYER57832 wrote:I cannot tell a decent joke.
I was going to ask why your going out with a stupid person, but this explains itPedronicus wrote:She's got a lovely rack and gives great head btw
b.k. barunt wrote:Depends on the context. Discriminating against a person because of his/her race is ignorant and lazy. Discriminating against a person because of their beliefs and/or behavior is quite rational.
Honibaz
I think culture determines your character traits more than race.THORNHEART wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Depends on the context. Discriminating against a person because of his/her race is ignorant and lazy. Discriminating against a person because of their beliefs and/or behavior is quite rational.
Honibaz
depending on your race your more likely to have certian character traits ....resulting in you being lazy or ignorant...
is this not evolutionarily correct?
It is not discrimination or racism if it is true
no on both counts.THORNHEART wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Depends on the context. Discriminating against a person because of his/her race is ignorant and lazy. Discriminating against a person because of their beliefs and/or behavior is quite rational.
Honibaz
depending on your race your more likely to have certian character traits ....resulting in you being lazy or ignorant...
is this not evolutionarily correct?
It is not discrimination or racism if it is true