Moderator: Community Team
I hate to be the one defending America since I spent the better part of my adult life standing up to NATO warmongers, however, I truly don't think the U.S. was ever in the slightest danger of being invaded and conquered by Austria in 1917, even if France had surrendered on Day 1 of the outbreak of hostilities.duday53 wrote: America was Isolationists before WWI and barely helped till the end after tons of soldiers had already died. Without those fallen soldiers, America would have lost..
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
You tell 'em, Dufour!tonbomorphew wrote:switzerland which is still isolationist!
*not including suisse
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Well, this really comes down to opinion and morals, but we should just continue to look out for everyone's best interest. Perhaps we should just send a really influential speaker to these countries (Arnold Schwarzenegger, perhaps) and try to persuade them to do the same...but it's when everyone only looks out for their best interest that the most people who live in unfortunate situations have to suffer.thegreekdog wrote:Is it better for a country to look out for the best interests of humanity when other countries are looking out for their own best interests? How do you reconcile hating American for looking out for its own best interests and not hating other countries for doing the same (for example, Venezuela, China, Iran, Israel, etc).Falkomagno wrote:Army of GOD wrote:
2. Overly patriotic people are annoying and dangerous. It shouldn't be about "your country" being the best and only looking out for your country's best interest....why the Hell can't it be looking out for humanity as a whole's best interest?![]()
![]()
![]()
You got it
The separation of classes is what eventually brings down every major empire/Superpower.It is the main cause which leads to further problems. Happened to Rome, England, and also France. It is happening and will worsen in Americaduday53 wrote: America can't be a super-power forever. Just like Rome, England, France, etc eventually something happens and it crumbles.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Wait - you've been hanging out in this thread waving the Swiss flag and you don't know who Henri Dufour is?tonbomorphew wrote:Whose Doufour?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
My Doufour!tonbomorphew wrote:Whose Doufour?
Dufour's DEAD!saxitoxin wrote:You tell 'em, Dufour!tonbomorphew wrote:switzerland which is still isolationist!
*not including suisse
you must be Catholictonbomorphew wrote:Ps the east doesn't like him {me}
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880


Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
That doesn't make any sense then ... you're a Swiss Protestant and you don't like the hero of Switzerland's Civil War?tonbomorphew wrote:Protestant!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
good googily moogily!tonbomorphew wrote:no the whole east just doesn't like geneva's football\soccer team!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
That is true, but they were still quite isolationist. Keeping to their own business and all. Didn't provide much help till they entered the war in 1917saxitoxin wrote:I hate to be the one defending America since I spent the better part of my adult life standing up to NATO warmongers, however, I truly don't think the U.S. was ever in the slightest danger of being invaded and conquered by Austria in 1917, even if France had surrendered on Day 1 of the outbreak of hostilities.duday53 wrote: America was Isolationists before WWI and barely helped till the end after tons of soldiers had already died. Without those fallen soldiers, America would have lost..
However, that would make an interesting steampunk film!
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
In your opinion, what compelling interest did the United States have to enter WWI that they "owed it" to the Allies to join in the fight?duday53 wrote:That is true, but they were still quite isolationist. Keeping to their own business and all. Didn't provide much help till they entered the war in 1917saxitoxin wrote:I hate to be the one defending America since I spent the better part of my adult life standing up to NATO warmongers, however, I truly don't think the U.S. was ever in the slightest danger of being invaded and conquered by Austria in 1917, even if France had surrendered on Day 1 of the outbreak of hostilities.duday53 wrote: America was Isolationists before WWI and barely helped till the end after tons of soldiers had already died. Without those fallen soldiers, America would have lost..
However, that would make an interesting steampunk film!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
But why WOULD they be expected to? If you say "because it's the right thing to do", then why aren't you railing at your own government for not being involved in pretty much every war around the world going on right now?duday53 wrote:That is true, but they were still quite isolationist. Keeping to their own business and all. Didn't provide much help till they entered the war in 1917saxitoxin wrote:I hate to be the one defending America since I spent the better part of my adult life standing up to NATO warmongers, however, I truly don't think the U.S. was ever in the slightest danger of being invaded and conquered by Austria in 1917, even if France had surrendered on Day 1 of the outbreak of hostilities.duday53 wrote: America was Isolationists before WWI and barely helped till the end after tons of soldiers had already died. Without those fallen soldiers, America would have lost..
However, that would make an interesting steampunk film!
See this is pretty much right. I totally agree with everything you had posted. I think people tend to forget that there was no good or evil in WWI. It was totally political or even personal between corrupt and inbred royal families. If I had been alive at the time in America, I'd be saying "hell, no let's not join this pointless war" Woodrow Wilson wanted to stay out of it. I think he was wise to not want to get involved.In your opinion, what compelling interest did the United States have to enter WWI that they "owed it" to the Allies to join in the fight?
If Emperor Charles, Emperor Wilhelm and Sultan Mehmed had won WWI it would certainly have changed the lives of everyone in France, Russia and the UK in very real ways.
How would it have changed day-to-day business for the United States (or Canada, for that matter)?
At the end of WWI British adult women still didn't have the right to vote, half the British parliament was still occupied by hereditary nobility, Ireland and India were still occupied and horribly oppressed nations; what exactly did the US and Canada fight for in WWI if it wasn't freedom in Europe, since it certainly wasn't? Had Germany, Austria and the Ottoman Empire have won, WWII and the Holocaust would never have happened. Other than North Americans get to have a day off work in November, what benefits were realized as a result of an Allied victory in WWI?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
And not only that, twice - in 1916 and 1917 - Emperors Wilhelm, Charles and Mehmet all offered to negotiate peace with the UK and France and withdraw to behind their pre-war borders.The Bison King wrote: See this is pretty much right. I totally agree with everything you had posted. I think people tend to forget that there was no good or evil in WWI. It was totally political or even personal between corrupt and inbred royal families. If I had been alive at the time in America, I'd be saying "hell, no let's not join this pointless war" Woodrow Wilson wanted to stay out of it. I think he was wise to not want to get involved.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880