Makes sense to me:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/141512/Congr ... tions.aspx
Moderator: Community Team
11% confidence is a lot worse than "not popular".InkL0sed wrote:Congress will never be popular. Everybody votes for 2 Congressmen, out of the hundreds that are there, and you might not have even voted for whoever does represent you.
Senator Mark Udall-I didn't vote for him.InkL0sed wrote:Congress will never be popular. Everybody votes for 2 Congressmen, out of the hundreds that are there, and you might not have even voted for whoever does represent you.
That's because of Colorado. May as well rename the state Denver, since that is what everything rotates around down there.Caleb the Cruel wrote:Senator Mark Udall-I didn't vote for him.InkL0sed wrote:Congress will never be popular. Everybody votes for 2 Congressmen, out of the hundreds that are there, and you might not have even voted for whoever does represent you.
Senator Michael Bennet-I didn't vote for him, after all he was appointed. But I didn't vote for his predecessor either.
Representative Betsy Markey-I didn't vote for her.
Dang, I vote for losers.
This begs a question. Obama was able to fire McChrystal. Could he fire one of the CCDRs or, if he tried, would one of the CCDRs fire him?Woodruff wrote:Makes sense to me:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/141512/Congr ... tions.aspx
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
what kind of excuse is that for the worst congress in history?InkL0sed wrote:Congress will never be popular. Everybody votes for 2 Congressmen, out of the hundreds that are there, and you might not have even voted for whoever does represent you.
Whoah! That flame was hotter than a chilli-dog with extra tabasco sauce!Phatscotty wrote:What a bootlicker!