Moderator: Community Team
AK_iceman wrote:Vote - Maxisgr8
I dont think I can stand to play a whole game with him. Better to get rid of him now and save us all some aggravation.
AK_iceman wrote:Ok, if you prefer I would like to lynch Cblake just as much. You guys can pick, and I will follow with my vote.
AK_iceman wrote:The first deaths are mostly random anyway. I don't see what the big deal is.
There’s nothing terribly wrong with any of these statements. A lot of mafia games begin with personal issues and some bad blood from previous games. Once people get focused, this kind of thing tends to fade away. The problem is AK’s “random” aggression is still on Max 10 pages later.AK_iceman wrote:Well... having never played with you in a game before I don't really know your style. The same goes for a lot of you. But, with Cblake his general forum attitude is less than helpful and to say the least you annoy me a great deal. I don't see you being helpful to the town, so it isn't necessary to keep you around. However, I would like to lynch max first, so you have the whole week to convince me why I shouldn't vote for you next week, and why you will be helpful.
I agree, assuming your townie. If your mafia, the more active you are, the more dangerous you are.AK_iceman wrote:On the first day?You're just gonna have to trust me that you don't want to vote off one of your most active posters in the game early on.
Could you elaborate on this? Because, it looks like you said it’s ok to lynch townies as long as there not “quality” townies.AK_iceman wrote:He is Mafia, or he is just terrible at this game. Either way we don't need him sticking around and confusing the rest of us with his nonsense posts.
This one shocked me. Ak is implying Red Bull did something wrong last game and is repeating it this game. The part he left out, Red Bull was a cop last game. Thus he had specific information that other people didn’t and wanted to release the info carefully without jumping into the spotlight about his role.AK_iceman wrote:About redbull, he did this same thing the entire time in my game also, posting little sentences about suspecting someone but never getting into detail unless people harass him about it.
QFEAK_iceman wrote:Mine wasn't random. I intended to vote for you ever since I saw your name on the list and when the game started I voted for you. That is called an intentional vote.
Actually, it’s in the best interest of the town to lynch mafia.AK_iceman wrote:And it's in the best interest of the town to lynch players who are unhelpful.
AK_iceman wrote:Its actually been over 24 hours since the day scene was posted, so that makes these 3 submarine posters or just plain inactive. I dislike both and would be willing to lynch any of them.
Mafia are the typically the best “lurker-hunters” in game. They do it to distract others from themselves.AK_iceman wrote:Interesting to note that the 3 players who haven't posted yet are still logging on to take their turns in games.
If a player is not participating, it is the Mod’s responsibility to replace him or better, not have him play at all.AK_iceman wrote:Yeah, since cmckinney had to be replaced from his last Mafia game also, perhaps it would be a good idea to lynch him, since he obviously is less than helpful.
thank you nyvek i forgot te defend my self on this pointAK_iceman wrote:
About redbull, he did this same thing the entire time in my game also, posting little sentences about suspecting someone but never getting into detail unless people harass him about it.
This one shocked me. Ak is implying Red Bull did something wrong last game and is repeating it this game. The part he left out, Red Bull was a cop last game. Thus he had specific information that other people didn’t and wanted to release the info carefully without jumping into the spotlight about his role.
and you bring up some good points in your post now i do have doubts about ak and sen 
I think you are full of shit nyvek. I vote no lynch every damn time until I find someone scummy. Max OMGUS voted Ice for putting a FOS on him. Thats not scummy? Now you come to Max's aide? I pray for your sake that max isn't scum or you will hang. Oh look I used your logic, so I can't possibly be wrong.....Nyvek wrote:It’s also interesting to note, Senfive was stuck on No Lynch for 8 pages until Max put a vote on Iceman. 2 posts later he voted max. If Iceman is mafia, it could mean Senfive is partnered with him.
FOS Senfive
I'll be at work till tomorrow morning. I won't be back for about 12 hours to see what scathing rebuttal IC and Sen cook up for me
red bull wrote:i just said thisPuff wrote:AK seems to be persistently hard on max and max is just voting out of anger
Vote max is gr8
you shouldn't vote someone because they voted you. Although I still think what AK Iceman did was scummy.any way
vote cmckinney
for not posting and fos max
cmckinney wrote:sorry guys, i couldnt get to a computer.
Red bull he says he couldn't get to a computer, and then leaves with no discussion on the topic yet you unvote him. Please give me a better reason than he is active now. one post doesn't mean squat.red bull wrote:unvote cmckinney he is back
How is this helpful at all voting for someone because you want to be different? Why not discuss what has been said thus far in the thread.mandalorian2298 wrote:vote AK_Iceman because I would rather be linched by a pack then become part of it
Mandalorian's post struck me as odd too. Voting someone just to stand out is really dumb.Senfive wrote:How is this helpful at all voting for someone because you want to be different? Why not discuss what has been said thus far in the thread.mandalorian2298 wrote:vote AK_Iceman because I would rather be linched by a pack then become part of it
Also Ice can you please remove Wicked's spam posting please cause it will make it that much harder to go back and read the thread when I want to tear into people.
Thats a no brainer and very, very poor attempt at bringing anything to the table when I called you out for not commenting on anything and just checking in. Why not talk about what others have said and your input. not just I agree with so and so. and will vote him cause I think so and so is right.cmckinney wrote:im guessing that with 16 people, we probably have 3 or 4 mafia, 1 or 2 cops of varying sanitiies, 1 or 2 docs. a vig, possibly a sk, and maybe a few masons. Comments?
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
