Moderator: Community Team

Well, I am sorry to say then, you are a fool, with perhaps the exception of defending your rock of course. Not defending an attack on your rock would probably lead to your death and the death of your family.heavycola wrote:I LOVE my country. I am so PROUD that my mother and father had perfunctory sex on this lump of rock instead of another lump of slightly different rock. And I KNOW that GOD HIMSELF has chosen this lump of rock over every other lump of rock to be his favouritest lump of rock on the planet.
I love my country SO FUCKIN MUCH that I will act in the service of WHATEVER agenda is presented to me by the politicians who make this arbitrarily delineated chunk of landmass what it is. Because even though words like 'freedom' and 'terror' are abstract nouns, I will lay down my life to either attack and defend (or defend and attack, i can't quite remember which) freedom and terror (and also possibly happiness and failure and mysticism, if I am asked) because I LOVE MY COUNTRY.
I WILL DIE DEFENDING OR ATTACKING AN ABSTRACT CONCEPT BECAUSE MY PARENTS FUCKED ON THIS LUMP OF ROCK INSTEAD OF A DIFFERENT LUMP OF ROCK. Goddamit i'm weeping again. Will someone please post a picture of a crying eagle that is defending freedom and has a dying patriot held in its flag-wrapped talon? PLEASE?
I suppose many if I choose not to pay for it, or defend it. But no one right now. I simply want heavycolas as well. He doesnt seem to think its worth defending.natty_dread wrote:Ok AAFITZ, who's after your house?
if you had seen my house, you would understand why it isn't worth defending.AAFitz wrote:I suppose many if I choose not to pay for it, or defend it. But no one right now. I simply want heavycolas as well. He doesnt seem to think its worth defending.natty_dread wrote:Ok AAFITZ, who's after your house?


AA for aces in tex holdem. Picked the name on a poker site few years ago, and liked it.natty_dread wrote:AAFitz, I've always wondered...
does your name read as "AA fits", as in "AA [battery] fits [in my TV remote]"?
Well as I said, I agreed with your intended sentiment, if not your delivery. I was just making the counterpoint that there are indeed patriots and that our rock indeed needs to be protected. What was now obviously unintentional, but interesting was as I said that it could be chanted by anyone on any rock really, and highlights the silliness of the human race in many ways.heavycola wrote:if you had seen my house, you would understand why it isn't worth defending.AAFitz wrote:I suppose many if I choose not to pay for it, or defend it. But no one right now. I simply want heavycolas as well. He doesnt seem to think its worth defending.natty_dread wrote:Ok AAFITZ, who's after your house?
Fitz, the point isn't that political systems which can enforce and defend things like property rights are a bad thing. If you tried to take my house from me, I would call the police (unless I was in at the time, in which case I would ninja you to death myself). I pay for the police, and the rest of the legal/justice system, out of my taxes. That is fair. But they are not better police just because they are english. My point, apart from procrastination and alleviating my own boredom, is that patriotism is pointless and misguided, not government. Now please get out of my garden, you're scaring the kids.
Not that I agree or disagree with your thesis, however, it's a bit simple and boorish. It indicts patriotism directed toward the exhortation of geography. In Radical Traditionalism, patriotism is directed toward the exhortation of ideology, a founding mythos.heavycola wrote:My point, apart from procrastination and alleviating my own boredom, is that patriotism is pointless and misguided, not government.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
First and foremost, patriotism is not based purely on location, but I will put my heap of sand over your lump of rock anyday of the year. Long Island is the best! It is the gold standard of locations! But that's not "patriotism" that's "tourism promotion!"natty_dread wrote:My lump of rock is better than your lump of rock.

Or Cocaine promotion.tzor wrote:First and foremost, patriotism is not based purely on location, but I will put my heap of sand over your lump of rock anyday of the year. Long Island is the best! It is the gold standard of locations! But that's not "patriotism" that's "tourism promotion!"natty_dread wrote:My lump of rock is better than your lump of rock.
Who gives a shit about radical traditionalism? I said I was a patriot because I love the arbitrarily delineated landmass on which my parents fucked. Of course it's geographical. That's why i support the building of a massive immigrant-proof fence all around it.saxitoxin wrote:Not that I agree or disagree with your thesis, however, it's a bit simple and boorish. It indicts patriotism directed toward the exhortation of geography. In Radical Traditionalism, patriotism is directed toward the exhortation of ideology, a founding mythos.heavycola wrote:My point, apart from procrastination and alleviating my own boredom, is that patriotism is pointless and misguided, not government.
You are presenting an argument that presumes that I presented an argument against an opponent I invented, but whose views I do not understand. Can an imaginary foil have views? More to the point, as the inventor of my own opponents, i understand their views fully. And that is why they are so wrong. It is also why I always win at arguments and individual sports.As a dialectic Marxist-Leninist, obviously, I am in counter-alignment with RT, however, I'm also in counter-alignment with dumbness. No argument is won if you don't understand the view of the side against whom you're arguing. As it stands, you're presenting an argument to an imaginary foil you've made up. In that sense you're guaranteed a "win" so congrats in advance.

some days even Player-Digits seems like she'd be a reliefheavycola wrote: something-something, look at me everyone!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Re: your misquote, I am sure most people post in the hope their posts will be read. I know you do!saxitoxin wrote:some days even Player-Digits seems like she'd be a reliefheavycola wrote: something-something, look at me everyone!

heavycola wrote:ROOOOAAAARRRR!!!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
ARRRGH! I did, actually.natty_dread wrote:SAXITROXIN,
YOU ARE COMMITING A LOGICAL FALLAXY!"!!!!!!11
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
I don't normally discuss these things, but guess who is the only person currently on my "foe" list.saxitoxin wrote:some days even Player-Digits seems like she'd be a reliefheavycola wrote: something-something, look at me everyone!

tzor wrote:I don't normally discuss these things, but guess who is the only person currently on my "foe" list.saxitoxin wrote:some days even Player-Digits seems like she'd be a reliefheavycola wrote: something-something, look at me everyone!![]()
My Blood Pressure went down 5 points the day after I did this wonderful thing. I highly reccomend it saxi.


I was going to ask if anyone though Patriotism is based on maybe a bit more than a piece of rock... but also on a belief or value system. However, your summary is much better Saxi... much more eloquent.saxitoxin wrote: Not that I agree or disagree with your thesis, however, it's a bit simple and boorish. It indicts patriotism directed toward the exhortation of geography. In Radical Traditionalism, patriotism is directed toward the exhortation of ideology, a founding mythos.
If your definition of patriotism is limited soley to negative things that have come from this.heavycola wrote: ... that patriotism is pointless and misguided, not government. Now please get out of my garden, you're scaring the kids.
It does. You can tell who won the battle, by who is authoring the history of it.2dimes wrote:Thus we arrive at a discussion that I would really like to have that just can never happen in text form.
Bummer. I'm starting to wonder if written history has any connection to what was actually going on at the time?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"