Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
If it hits deadline then I will lynch whoever has the most votes. No lynches are boring.AceArtemis wrote:Is the result of a passed deadline a no lynch, or a lynch?Mr. Squirrel wrote:Agreed. Deadline set for this friday night. Start posting.edocsil wrote:This is slowing down fast. We will never get 8 votes before thanksgiving, I may even not be exaggerating.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changedMr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
colton24 wrote:So you are like a politician?
unvote. Now who is our next victim to interrigate?
No lynch brings me to be suspicious about you. I'd rather pressure a claim than not. I'll unvote for now to allow time for a counterclaim.aage wrote:unvote vote no lynch
Let's see where that brings us.

pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that

pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
haiMr. Squirrel wrote:seems like wercool hasn't been on in a while. searching for a replacement now.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
role being sent now.Fircoal wrote:haiMr. Squirrel wrote:seems like wercool hasn't been on in a while. searching for a replacement now.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
comfirmzel, I'll read the thread once I'm bored of reading the silleh debates in the off-topic forum.Mr. Squirrel wrote:role being sent now.Fircoal wrote:haiMr. Squirrel wrote:seems like wercool hasn't been on in a while. searching for a replacement now.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Well we know that Saf is town but usually the 3rd vote is pretty scummy...safariguy5 wrote:No lynch is not the answer, I'd rather pressure a roleclaim from someone before deciding on whether to no lynch or not. We need some information from day 1.
unvote vote naxus
Vote 4, The material in it isn't very original and seems to add nothing while putting someone closer to a lynch. From what I read in the game lalaland seemed kinda weird and this post does nawt help. FOS: Lalalandlalaland wrote:I agree with safari.
Lets pressure a bit, see what we get, and i'm assuming if we hit deadline we're getting a no lynch anyhow, so what do we have to lose?
also unvote vote naxus... nothing personal on this, just trying to get some info
As Frenchie-chan says it's the 5th post. PErsonally as I've seen the French scum play many games before I know that for us old school players the idea of trying to actually LYNCH SOMEONE (in the game of mafia I never would have thunk it) is actually IMPORTANT. Considering how I've been some of the games go around here lately I don't really blame him if he's jumping on a bandwagon because it'll need to a lynch. Then my game happenedga7 wrote:I'm also in favor of putting pressure on someone before deadline, so here goes:
Unvote Vote Naxus
That's the 5th vote by my count, are you ready to talk now, punk?!
I don't know many of the new faces so I don't know if Naxus is experienced but either way no lynch vote might be as good a slip up as we get for now...
This vote like Lalaland's looks more like fluff and bandwagoning me. I'm gonna keep an eye on Colton but he's kinda hard to tract as he's a bit like NES (but nawt that bad x3)colton24 wrote:How about we up the ante? Vote Naxus
That be L-2. You wanna talk little man?
Going against the norm of what's above him. Even though no lunches SUCK it paints a pro-town picture of him to me.aage wrote:unvote vote no lynch
Let's see where that brings us.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Then why didn't you post that when you voted no lynch? We must have done it a hundred times already, but we would have at least argued no lynch so I could have an idea if you were scum or mislead town. Frankly if I was a vig I would have been tempted to have a shot at you this night purely because your statement seemed so random and could have easily been interpreted as "Let's divert attention from the wagon on Naxus". See, if you're town it's always better to expose your reasoning than just say "Let's see where that brings us". As for no lynch, town's only real power is to lynch. You can't expect power roles to win a game, that's not what mafia is about and frankly it'd be freaking boring if that was the case. So especially on day 1 where there's almost no info, you have to attack the most minute thing because it could be a slipup. Wanting no lynch means you almost systematically start from scratch on day 2, which is hell counterproductive and only helps scum. It doesn't matter much if a townie gets lynched (provided he wasn't freaking important) as long as he was scummy and you can try to find scum on his wagon afterwards, for instance. No lynch is really rarely justified.aage wrote:It just seemed kinda foolish to pick a random person and vote for him just for the heck of it. Rather have a no lynch than kill someone / force someone to claim which mostly results in death during night. I chose to vote no lynch because you did so too, and it resulted in the bunch of ppl jumping you like madmen. Wanted to check whether they would do the same to me. Apparently not. This is strange imo, but I cant call them all a bunch of scum since there simply isn't that much scum.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
I'll make three remarks about this.ga7 wrote:Then why didn't you post that when you voted no lynch? We must have done it a hundred times already, but we would have at least argued no lynch so I could have an idea if you were scum or mislead town. Frankly if I was a vig I would have been tempted to have a shot at you this night purely because your statement seemed so random and could have easily been interpreted as "Let's divert attention from the wagon on Naxus". See, if you're town it's always better to expose your reasoning than just say "Let's see where that brings us". As for no lynch, town's only real power is to lynch. You can't expect power roles to win a game, that's not what mafia is about and frankly it'd be freaking boring if that was the case. So especially on day 1 where there's almost no info, you have to attack the most minute thing because it could be a slipup. Wanting no lynch means you almost systematically start from scratch on day 2, which is hell counterproductive and only helps scum. It doesn't matter much if a townie gets lynched (provided he wasn't freaking important) as long as he was scummy and you can try to find scum on his wagon afterwards, for instance. No lynch is really rarely justified.