Moderator: Community Team

That appears to me to be one big old commercial for MajorCommand.Com. I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?yeti_c wrote:Came across this website the other day...
http://www.playriskonline.net/
I didn't realise there were so many other risk sites out there...
C.
Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality. Seriously,Woodruff wrote: I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?

What part of "7 high quality maps vs 163 maps with 60 high quality maps" do you not understand?mibi wrote:Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality.Woodruff wrote: I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?
I guess the part about the people who made the 60 high quality maps now make maps at MajorCommand instead.Woodruff wrote:What part of "7 high quality maps vs 163 maps with 60 high quality maps" do you not understand?mibi wrote:Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality.Woodruff wrote: I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?
Which is fine...but a rating based on future promise instead of reality? Never mind the other ratings, which appear to me to be just as thin as far as rationale goes. As I said...I strongly suspect the individual in charge of the ratings site is also closely affiliated with MajorCommand.mibi wrote:I guess the part about the people who made the 60 high quality maps now make maps at MajorCommand instead.Woodruff wrote:What part of "7 high quality maps vs 163 maps with 60 high quality maps" do you not understand?mibi wrote:Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality.Woodruff wrote: I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?
I agree with youzel x3Woodruff wrote:Which is fine...but a rating based on future promise instead of reality? Never mind the other ratings, which appear to me to be just as thin as far as rationale goes. As I said...I strongly suspect the individual in charge of the ratings site is also closely affiliated with MajorCommand.mibi wrote:I guess the part about the people who made the 60 high quality maps now make maps at MajorCommand instead.Woodruff wrote:What part of "7 high quality maps vs 163 maps with 60 high quality maps" do you not understand?mibi wrote:Are you aware that the top map makers on ConquerClub, who have produced most of CC's awesome maps, have all gone to MajorCommand. I think you are over-valuing quantity over quality.Woodruff wrote: I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Seriously. I made an account at major command just to check it out. Haven't gotten the confirmation email yet, not exactly impressed with it so far.Woodruff wrote:That appears to me to be one big old commercial for MajorCommand.Com. I mean, seriously...7 maps gets a 77 rating while our tremendous number of maps gets an 81?yeti_c wrote:Came across this website the other day...
http://www.playriskonline.net/
I didn't realise there were so many other risk sites out there...
C.
In truth, I strongly suspect that the individual that created the playriskonline site is the same one that developed MajorCommand.Com.

There have been some maps i quite enjoy that came out recently. The napoleon map, Runification Italy and Germany are some very cool maps.porkenbeans wrote:I agree that, like in all things, map makers do hone their skills, and do get better with time. But, to truly call yourself a "good" Map Maker, you must first have artistic talent. I am afraid that the so called "top" talent these days at CC, with a few exceptions, are just NOT very good artists to begin with. I will not point fingers here. I will let mibi do that, as he is so good at it.
They sure are.Baron Von PWN wrote:There have been some maps i quite enjoy that came out recently. The napoleon map, Runification Italy and Germany are some very cool maps.porkenbeans wrote:I agree that, like in all things, map makers do hone their skills, and do get better with time. But, to truly call yourself a "good" Map Maker, you must first have artistic talent. I am afraid that the so called "top" talent these days at CC, with a few exceptions, are just NOT very good artists to begin with. I will not point fingers here. I will let mibi do that, as he is so good at it.

Couldn't agree more. They're spectacular maps with great graphics.Baron Von PWN wrote:There have been some maps i quite enjoy that came out recently. The napoleon map, Runification Italy and Germany are some very cool maps.porkenbeans wrote:I agree that, like in all things, map makers do hone their skills, and do get better with time. But, to truly call yourself a "good" Map Maker, you must first have artistic talent. I am afraid that the so called "top" talent these days at CC, with a few exceptions, are just NOT very good artists to begin with. I will not point fingers here. I will let mibi do that, as he is so good at it.
Maybe so, but I think that they have more talent residing there. CC's maps are numerous, that is for sure, but only 30% - 40% are what I would call top quality maps. Where as MC's maps are (for the time being) only a few, but all are spectacular.Army of GOD wrote:Couldn't agree more. They're spectacular maps with great graphics.Baron Von PWN wrote:There have been some maps i quite enjoy that came out recently. The napoleon map, Runification Italy and Germany are some very cool maps.porkenbeans wrote:I agree that, like in all things, map makers do hone their skills, and do get better with time. But, to truly call yourself a "good" Map Maker, you must first have artistic talent. I am afraid that the so called "top" talent these days at CC, with a few exceptions, are just NOT very good artists to begin with. I will not point fingers here. I will let mibi do that, as he is so good at it.
See, I just see MC going down the same road. I mean ya, some of the current maps aren't wonderful graphically, but there are so many on this site that it doesn't really matter. They'll run into an artistic wall too, I think.

What have you against lunar war?mibi wrote:
This is what ConquerClub is turning out now.

He said it all here-natty_dread wrote:What have you against lunar war?mibi wrote:
This is what ConquerClub is turning out now.

Don't worry 2dimes. I'm pretty sure it's political mumbojumbo.2dimes wrote:I'm kidding, I don't even know what a GFX is.
porkenbeans wrote: Re: Lunar War <v20> p1, 25 - POLL - vote please!
Postby mibi on Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:37 pm
As a successful graphic designer of many years who is quite knowledgeable in the field of user experience and user interfaces, it is my professional opinion that this map sucks ballz. I would list the many egregious violations of all things aethetic, however I am afraid my monitor might run out of ink. If this map were quenched in even 10% of its current form it would signify that the CC foundry is nothing more than a farting ground from over-encouraged noobs to fumble their way through pirated software in an attempt to depict our closest celestial bodies as visual crack whores slumming the starscape.
p.s. a bird pooped on your moon.[/color]

definitely need a sperm donation room.hairy potter wrote:i think we should have a map where players fight over different stages of the reproductive cycle