IQ; WHATS YOURS?

stinkycheese · Post by **stinkycheese** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:04 pm

I got a 65, will someone be my friend?

Kugelblitz22 · Post by **Kugelblitz22** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:25 pm

static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english

probably false...

Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...

hawkeye · Post by **hawkeye** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:38 pm

I got 101 after rapidly guessing through the last 7 questions.

DirtyDishSoap · Post by **DirtyDishSoap** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:51 pm

after reaching 22, i just guessed, got like 110 i think...Find a better IQ Test, that one just gave me a headache with all the patterns and spins...

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:57 pm

razor34 · Post by **razor34** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:16 pm

stinkycheese wrote:I got a 65, will someone be my friend?

Can i be your friend Stink

y.PLEEEAAAASSEE

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:17 pm

I got 107, if I tried harder maybe I could of gotten better, or I not.

BBust · Post by **BBust** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:41 pm

Actually just to clear this up for u guys 100 means average. My dads a scientist and i have to hear about this crap all the time. And Einsteins IQ in his day in age was actually 280 but in our day in age he'd just be above average by a good chunk. If your IQ is 130 it just means your slightly above average. Plus certain ppl score way higher in diffrent areas that was IQ tests are BS.

Minkish · Post by **Minkish** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:54 pm

126. meh

war_bloodline · Post by **war_bloodline** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:19 pm

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:02 am

Kugelblitz22 wrote:
static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english

probably false...
Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...

These IQ tests might not be very accurate, but the personality tests are worse.

"Which shape do you feel is more inteligent?"
'I dont know, they are both freaking abstract shapes! How can abstract shapes be intelligent!'

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:24 am

Neutrino wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote:
static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english

probably false...
Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
These IQ tests might not be very accurate, but the personality tests are worse.

"Which shape do you feel is more inteligent?"
'I dont know, they are both freaking abstract shapes! How can abstract shapes be intelligent!'

That show's you've got a great personality!

boberz · Post by **boberz** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:14 am

my lowest 142 my highest 150 on various quizzes both internet and tv and books but i want to do a mensar one to know exactly as these arent accurate

btownmeggy · Post by **btownmeggy** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:23 am

Kugelblitz22 wrote: Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...

Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:32 am

btownmeggy wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote: Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.

Agreed. These are about as accurate as the "Love Tester" at the local Pizza Parlor. Hey! It says's I am "Hot Stuff"!

BOREDGIRL · Post by **BOREDGIRL** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:24 pm

I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.

boberz · Post by **boberz** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm

btownmeggy wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote: Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...
Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.

no i agree with this as i said i want to be done by mensar to test as i dont believe the ones i got

btownmeggy · Post by **btownmeggy** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:33 pm

BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.

How does one "fail" an IQ test??

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:35 pm

Ya, you have a point. You can only score really really low and be considered mentally challenged. But not fail.

Jesse, Bad Boy · Post by **Jesse, Bad Boy** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:36 pm

btownmeggy wrote:
BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.
How does one "fail" an IQ test??

XD

Sweetheart, it is times like this when you need to just sit back, let them talk their nonsense, and revel in your higher intellectual functioning. It's what I do in most threads of this nature, unless I see something that sorely needs to be corrected.

Saves on the headaches and marijuana bill.

Aries · Post by **Aries** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:38 pm

I had to leave within 5 minutes, so I didn't finish it lol, but I thought normal was 130, and 100 was just enough to get yourself dressed

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:41 pm

Aries wrote:I had to leave within 5 minutes, so I didn't finish it lol, but I thought normal was 130, and 100 was just enough to get yourself dressed

No, you can dress yourself and your IQ is under 100

BOREDGIRL · Post by **BOREDGIRL** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:02 pm

btownmeggy wrote:
BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.
How does one "fail" an IQ test??

On fails an IQ test by failing to be able to complete it. Frustration leads one to chose not to answer the questions rather than chose to answer them incorrectly. A score of zero = a fail in an IQ test.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:49 pm

wick · Post by **wick** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:45 pm

103, no wonder i lose so many games playing against all you geniuses...

IQ; WHATS YOURS?

what is your iq?

IQ...